老年患者的脊柱 SBRT:年龄和剂量对先天性椎体压缩骨折风险的影响

Adrian Wai Chan, K Liang Zeng, Daniel Moore-Palhares, Eshetu G Atenafu, Hanbo Chen, Sten Myrehaug, Mark Ruschin, Hany Soliman, Chia-Lin Tseng, Bei-Bei Zhang, Cari Whyne, Pejman Maralani, Arjun Sahgal, Jay Detsky
{"title":"老年患者的脊柱 SBRT:年龄和剂量对先天性椎体压缩骨折风险的影响","authors":"Adrian Wai Chan, K Liang Zeng, Daniel Moore-Palhares, Eshetu G Atenafu, Hanbo Chen, Sten Myrehaug, Mark Ruschin, Hany Soliman, Chia-Lin Tseng, Bei-Bei Zhang, Cari Whyne, Pejman Maralani, Arjun Sahgal, Jay Detsky","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for spinal metastases, however, outcomes specific to a geriatric population have not been described. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of spine SBRT, in particular the rate of iatrogenic vertebral compression fracture (VCF), in patients aged 70 and older.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From a prospectively maintained single-institutional database of 976 patients and 2407 spinal segments treated with SBRT for vertebral metastases between 2008-2021, all patients aged 70 or above were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome is the risk of VCF. Secondary outcomes including MRI-based local failure and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>252 consecutive patients with 580 spinal segments treated with spine SBRT were reviewed. The median age was 75.8 (range: 70-90.3) years and the median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 16.9 (6.4-41.3) months. The median OS of the entire cohort was 20.3 months and the 2-year LF rate was 14.3%. The cumulative risk of VCF at 12 and 24 months were 8.4% and 12.3%, respectively. Significant predictors of VCF on multivariable analyses included greater biologically equivalent dose, baseline fracture and increasing age. In particular, the 2-year VCF rate and median time to VCF were 30.3% and 3.4 months for those 86 and older, compared to 11.2% and 12.8 months for those younger than 86, respectively (p=0.0011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Spine SBRT should be considered in a geriatric population, however, for those 86 and older we suggest caution due to the significant risk of VCF.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spine SBRT in Geriatric Patients: Implications of Age and Dose on Iatrogenic Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Wai Chan, K Liang Zeng, Daniel Moore-Palhares, Eshetu G Atenafu, Hanbo Chen, Sten Myrehaug, Mark Ruschin, Hany Soliman, Chia-Lin Tseng, Bei-Bei Zhang, Cari Whyne, Pejman Maralani, Arjun Sahgal, Jay Detsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for spinal metastases, however, outcomes specific to a geriatric population have not been described. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of spine SBRT, in particular the rate of iatrogenic vertebral compression fracture (VCF), in patients aged 70 and older.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From a prospectively maintained single-institutional database of 976 patients and 2407 spinal segments treated with SBRT for vertebral metastases between 2008-2021, all patients aged 70 or above were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome is the risk of VCF. Secondary outcomes including MRI-based local failure and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>252 consecutive patients with 580 spinal segments treated with spine SBRT were reviewed. The median age was 75.8 (range: 70-90.3) years and the median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 16.9 (6.4-41.3) months. The median OS of the entire cohort was 20.3 months and the 2-year LF rate was 14.3%. The cumulative risk of VCF at 12 and 24 months were 8.4% and 12.3%, respectively. Significant predictors of VCF on multivariable analyses included greater biologically equivalent dose, baseline fracture and increasing age. In particular, the 2-year VCF rate and median time to VCF were 30.3% and 3.4 months for those 86 and older, compared to 11.2% and 12.8 months for those younger than 86, respectively (p=0.0011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Spine SBRT should be considered in a geriatric population, however, for those 86 and older we suggest caution due to the significant risk of VCF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.082\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)是治疗脊柱转移瘤的一种有效方法,但老年患者的具体疗效尚未见报道。本研究旨在调查脊柱SBRT的疗效和安全性,尤其是70岁及以上患者的先天性椎体压缩骨折(VCF)发生率:从2008-2021年间使用SBRT治疗椎体转移瘤的976名患者和2407个脊柱节段的前瞻性单一机构数据库中,对所有70岁及以上患者进行回顾性研究。主要结果是发生 VCF 的风险。次要结果包括基于 MRI 的局部失败和总生存期(OS)。中位年龄为 75.8(范围:70-90.3)岁,中位(四分位数间距)随访时间为 16.9(6.4-41.3)个月。整个组群的中位 OS 为 20.3 个月,2 年 LF 率为 14.3%。12个月和24个月的VCF累积风险分别为8.4%和12.3%。在多变量分析中,VCF 的重要预测因素包括更大的生物等效剂量、基线骨折和年龄的增加。特别是,86岁及以上人群的2年VCF率和VCF中位时间分别为30.3%和3.4个月,而86岁以下人群的VCF率和VCF中位时间分别为11.2%和12.8个月(P=0.0011):老年群体应考虑脊柱SBRT,但对于86岁及86岁以上的患者,由于VCF的风险很大,我们建议慎重考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spine SBRT in Geriatric Patients: Implications of Age and Dose on Iatrogenic Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk.

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for spinal metastases, however, outcomes specific to a geriatric population have not been described. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of spine SBRT, in particular the rate of iatrogenic vertebral compression fracture (VCF), in patients aged 70 and older.

Patients and methods: From a prospectively maintained single-institutional database of 976 patients and 2407 spinal segments treated with SBRT for vertebral metastases between 2008-2021, all patients aged 70 or above were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome is the risk of VCF. Secondary outcomes including MRI-based local failure and overall survival (OS).

Results: 252 consecutive patients with 580 spinal segments treated with spine SBRT were reviewed. The median age was 75.8 (range: 70-90.3) years and the median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 16.9 (6.4-41.3) months. The median OS of the entire cohort was 20.3 months and the 2-year LF rate was 14.3%. The cumulative risk of VCF at 12 and 24 months were 8.4% and 12.3%, respectively. Significant predictors of VCF on multivariable analyses included greater biologically equivalent dose, baseline fracture and increasing age. In particular, the 2-year VCF rate and median time to VCF were 30.3% and 3.4 months for those 86 and older, compared to 11.2% and 12.8 months for those younger than 86, respectively (p=0.0011).

Conclusion and relevance: Spine SBRT should be considered in a geriatric population, however, for those 86 and older we suggest caution due to the significant risk of VCF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Spine SBRT in Geriatric Patients: Implications of Age and Dose on Iatrogenic Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk. The association of linear energy transfer and dose with radiation necrosis after pencil beam scanning proton therapy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors: Association of dose and LET with radiation necrosis. Data-Driven Volumetric CT Image Generation from Surface Structures using a Patient-Specific Deep Leaning Model. Phase II trial of consolidative stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Docetaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer after staging surgery: a phase II study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1