{"title":"近端肾小管细胞中各种衰老诱导剂的比较分析","authors":"Piyaporn Rattananinsruang, Chadanat Noonin, Visith Thongboonkerd","doi":"10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Senescence in renal cells has attracted wide attention as the critical factor promoting renal fibrosis and chronic kidney disease. Establishing a reliable cellular model is essential to study mechanisms underlying renal cell senescence. Herein, we compared various inducers to define the most suitable senescence inducer for HK-2 proximal tubular cells. These inducers included hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), high-temperature (HT), glucose, mannitol and hydroxyurea (HU). To screen for optimal concentration/level, the highest concentration/level of each inducer that did not increase cell death (to avoid severe toxicity) was selected for senescence induction and comparative analysis using the two most appropriate markers for HK-2 cell senescence as recently established. The data revealed that 0.4 mM, 43 °C, 80 mM, 80 mM and 100 μM were the optimal concentrations/levels of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, HT, glucose, mannitol and HU, respectively. Comparative analysis using optimal concentration/level of each marker revealed that 0.4 mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, HT at 43 °C, 80 mM glucose and 80 mM mannitol were the weak senescence inducers. The most effective inducer for HK-2 senescence was 100 μM HU, which provided the greatest fold-changes of cell area and granularity when compared with other stimuli in a time-dependent manner. Based on these data comparing H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, HT, glucose, mannitol and HU at their optimal concentrations/levels, 100 μM HU seems to be most effective for senescence induction in HK-2 cells for <em>in vitro</em> study of proximal renal tubular cells.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 116571"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of various senescence inducers in proximal renal tubular cells\",\"authors\":\"Piyaporn Rattananinsruang, Chadanat Noonin, Visith Thongboonkerd\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Senescence in renal cells has attracted wide attention as the critical factor promoting renal fibrosis and chronic kidney disease. Establishing a reliable cellular model is essential to study mechanisms underlying renal cell senescence. Herein, we compared various inducers to define the most suitable senescence inducer for HK-2 proximal tubular cells. These inducers included hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), high-temperature (HT), glucose, mannitol and hydroxyurea (HU). To screen for optimal concentration/level, the highest concentration/level of each inducer that did not increase cell death (to avoid severe toxicity) was selected for senescence induction and comparative analysis using the two most appropriate markers for HK-2 cell senescence as recently established. The data revealed that 0.4 mM, 43 °C, 80 mM, 80 mM and 100 μM were the optimal concentrations/levels of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, HT, glucose, mannitol and HU, respectively. Comparative analysis using optimal concentration/level of each marker revealed that 0.4 mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, HT at 43 °C, 80 mM glucose and 80 mM mannitol were the weak senescence inducers. The most effective inducer for HK-2 senescence was 100 μM HU, which provided the greatest fold-changes of cell area and granularity when compared with other stimuli in a time-dependent manner. Based on these data comparing H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, HT, glucose, mannitol and HU at their optimal concentrations/levels, 100 μM HU seems to be most effective for senescence induction in HK-2 cells for <em>in vitro</em> study of proximal renal tubular cells.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis\",\"volume\":\"254 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0731708524006137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0731708524006137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肾脏细胞的衰老作为促进肾脏纤维化和慢性肾脏疾病的关键因素已引起广泛关注。建立可靠的细胞模型对研究肾细胞衰老的机制至关重要。在此,我们比较了各种诱导剂,以确定最适合 HK-2 近端肾小管细胞的衰老诱导剂。这些诱导剂包括过氧化氢(H2O2)、高温(HT)、葡萄糖、甘露醇和羟基脲(HU)。为了筛选最佳浓度/水平,我们选择了不增加细胞死亡(以避免严重毒性)的最高浓度/水平的诱导剂进行衰老诱导,并使用最近确定的两种最合适的 HK-2 细胞衰老标记进行比较分析。数据显示,0.4 mM、43 ℃、80 mM、80 mM 和 100 μM 分别是 H2O2、HT、葡萄糖、甘露醇和 HU 的最佳浓度/水平。利用各标记物的最佳浓度/水平进行的比较分析表明,0.4 mM H2O2、43 ℃下的HT、80 mM葡萄糖和80 mM甘露醇是弱衰老诱导剂。对 HK-2 衰老最有效的诱导剂是 100 μM HU,与其他刺激相比,它能以时间依赖的方式使细胞面积和颗粒度发生最大的倍数变化。基于这些数据,比较了 H2O2、HT、葡萄糖、甘露醇和 HU 的最佳浓度/水平,100 μM HU 似乎是体外研究近端肾小管细胞时诱导 HK-2 细胞衰老的最有效方法。
Comparative analysis of various senescence inducers in proximal renal tubular cells
Senescence in renal cells has attracted wide attention as the critical factor promoting renal fibrosis and chronic kidney disease. Establishing a reliable cellular model is essential to study mechanisms underlying renal cell senescence. Herein, we compared various inducers to define the most suitable senescence inducer for HK-2 proximal tubular cells. These inducers included hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), high-temperature (HT), glucose, mannitol and hydroxyurea (HU). To screen for optimal concentration/level, the highest concentration/level of each inducer that did not increase cell death (to avoid severe toxicity) was selected for senescence induction and comparative analysis using the two most appropriate markers for HK-2 cell senescence as recently established. The data revealed that 0.4 mM, 43 °C, 80 mM, 80 mM and 100 μM were the optimal concentrations/levels of H2O2, HT, glucose, mannitol and HU, respectively. Comparative analysis using optimal concentration/level of each marker revealed that 0.4 mM H2O2, HT at 43 °C, 80 mM glucose and 80 mM mannitol were the weak senescence inducers. The most effective inducer for HK-2 senescence was 100 μM HU, which provided the greatest fold-changes of cell area and granularity when compared with other stimuli in a time-dependent manner. Based on these data comparing H2O2, HT, glucose, mannitol and HU at their optimal concentrations/levels, 100 μM HU seems to be most effective for senescence induction in HK-2 cells for in vitro study of proximal renal tubular cells.
期刊介绍:
This journal is an international medium directed towards the needs of academic, clinical, government and industrial analysis by publishing original research reports and critical reviews on pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. It covers the interdisciplinary aspects of analysis in the pharmaceutical, biomedical and clinical sciences, including developments in analytical methodology, instrumentation, computation and interpretation. Submissions on novel applications focusing on drug purity and stability studies, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic monitoring, metabolic profiling; drug-related aspects of analytical biochemistry and forensic toxicology; quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry are also welcome.
Studies from areas of well established and poorly selective methods, such as UV-VIS spectrophotometry (including derivative and multi-wavelength measurements), basic electroanalytical (potentiometric, polarographic and voltammetric) methods, fluorimetry, flow-injection analysis, etc. are accepted for publication in exceptional cases only, if a unique and substantial advantage over presently known systems is demonstrated. The same applies to the assay of simple drug formulations by any kind of methods and the determination of drugs in biological samples based merely on spiked samples. Drug purity/stability studies should contain information on the structure elucidation of the impurities/degradants.