分析自然植物群落和农作物的植金石输入量以及土壤硅的可用性(阿根廷东南部潘潘地区)

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY Flora Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.flora.2024.152640
María Laura Benvenuto , Mara De Rito , Margarita Luisa Osterrieth , Mariana Fernández Honaine
{"title":"分析自然植物群落和农作物的植金石输入量以及土壤硅的可用性(阿根廷东南部潘潘地区)","authors":"María Laura Benvenuto ,&nbsp;Mara De Rito ,&nbsp;Margarita Luisa Osterrieth ,&nbsp;Mariana Fernández Honaine","doi":"10.1016/j.flora.2024.152640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Silica phytoliths constitute an important source of Si to terrestrial environments. Different plant communities contribute varying amounts of phytoliths to soils due to differences in plant taxa. In Pampean region, Argentina, agriculture has largely replaced natural communities like grasslands and wetlands. This replacement affects the specific plant composition of the area, modifies the potential phytolith input from plants to soils, and as a consequence, the soil Si content. Since no study specifically measures the potential phytolith contribution from natural communities and crops in the region, we aimed to quantify and compare phytolith production in natural plant communities and typical crops from Pampean region and its relation to available soil Si content. Three natural communities and three crops were selected. Phytolith content in plant communities was estimated by the phytolith amount produced in plant tissues (calcination technique) and plant biomass, while soil Si was measured by UV–VIS spectrophotometry. Phytolith content differed between natural communities and crops. The communities with the highest phytolith content were those that contained high phytolith-producing species and / or high plant biomass (959.61 ± 95.64 and 665.27 ± 382.38 kg/ha, wheat and \"juncal\", respectively). There were no significant differences in Si content between natural and cropland soils, and phytolith production differences in plant communities were not reflected in the soils. Probably soil genesis, vegetation history and / or management can explain the lack of differences. Continuous monitoring of phytolith production, plant biomass and soil Si content could explain the Si cycle in this region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55156,"journal":{"name":"Flora","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 152640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of phytolith inputs from natural plant communities and crops and soil silicon availability (Southeastern Pampean region, Argentina)\",\"authors\":\"María Laura Benvenuto ,&nbsp;Mara De Rito ,&nbsp;Margarita Luisa Osterrieth ,&nbsp;Mariana Fernández Honaine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.flora.2024.152640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Silica phytoliths constitute an important source of Si to terrestrial environments. Different plant communities contribute varying amounts of phytoliths to soils due to differences in plant taxa. In Pampean region, Argentina, agriculture has largely replaced natural communities like grasslands and wetlands. This replacement affects the specific plant composition of the area, modifies the potential phytolith input from plants to soils, and as a consequence, the soil Si content. Since no study specifically measures the potential phytolith contribution from natural communities and crops in the region, we aimed to quantify and compare phytolith production in natural plant communities and typical crops from Pampean region and its relation to available soil Si content. Three natural communities and three crops were selected. Phytolith content in plant communities was estimated by the phytolith amount produced in plant tissues (calcination technique) and plant biomass, while soil Si was measured by UV–VIS spectrophotometry. Phytolith content differed between natural communities and crops. The communities with the highest phytolith content were those that contained high phytolith-producing species and / or high plant biomass (959.61 ± 95.64 and 665.27 ± 382.38 kg/ha, wheat and \\\"juncal\\\", respectively). There were no significant differences in Si content between natural and cropland soils, and phytolith production differences in plant communities were not reflected in the soils. Probably soil genesis, vegetation history and / or management can explain the lack of differences. Continuous monitoring of phytolith production, plant biomass and soil Si content could explain the Si cycle in this region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flora\",\"volume\":\"322 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0367253024001920\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flora","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0367253024001920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硅质植物体是陆地环境中重要的硅源。由于植物类群的差异,不同植物群落为土壤提供的植硅体数量各不相同。在阿根廷潘潘地区,农业在很大程度上取代了草原和湿地等自然群落。这种替代影响了该地区特定的植物组成,改变了从植物到土壤的潜在植金石输入量,从而改变了土壤的硅含量。由于没有研究专门测量该地区自然群落和农作物的潜在植物石贡献,我们的目的是量化和比较帕潘地区自然植物群落和典型农作物的植物石产量及其与可用土壤硅含量的关系。我们选择了三个自然群落和三种作物。植物群落中的植生石含量是通过植物组织(煅烧技术)和植物生物量中产生的植生石数量估算的,而土壤中的硅则是通过紫外-可见分光光度法测量的。不同自然群落和农作物的植生石含量各不相同。植化石含量最高的群落是那些含有高植化石生产物种和/或高植物生物量的群落(小麦和 "juncal "的植化石含量分别为 959.61 ± 95.64 和 665.27 ± 382.38 千克/公顷)。天然土壤和耕地土壤中的硅含量没有明显差异,植物群落中植物体产量的差异也没有反映在土壤中。土壤成因、植被历史和/或管理可能是造成差异的原因。对植生石产量、植物生物量和土壤硅含量的持续监测可以解释该地区的硅循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of phytolith inputs from natural plant communities and crops and soil silicon availability (Southeastern Pampean region, Argentina)
Silica phytoliths constitute an important source of Si to terrestrial environments. Different plant communities contribute varying amounts of phytoliths to soils due to differences in plant taxa. In Pampean region, Argentina, agriculture has largely replaced natural communities like grasslands and wetlands. This replacement affects the specific plant composition of the area, modifies the potential phytolith input from plants to soils, and as a consequence, the soil Si content. Since no study specifically measures the potential phytolith contribution from natural communities and crops in the region, we aimed to quantify and compare phytolith production in natural plant communities and typical crops from Pampean region and its relation to available soil Si content. Three natural communities and three crops were selected. Phytolith content in plant communities was estimated by the phytolith amount produced in plant tissues (calcination technique) and plant biomass, while soil Si was measured by UV–VIS spectrophotometry. Phytolith content differed between natural communities and crops. The communities with the highest phytolith content were those that contained high phytolith-producing species and / or high plant biomass (959.61 ± 95.64 and 665.27 ± 382.38 kg/ha, wheat and "juncal", respectively). There were no significant differences in Si content between natural and cropland soils, and phytolith production differences in plant communities were not reflected in the soils. Probably soil genesis, vegetation history and / or management can explain the lack of differences. Continuous monitoring of phytolith production, plant biomass and soil Si content could explain the Si cycle in this region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Flora
Flora 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
130
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: FLORA publishes original contributions and review articles on plant structure (morphology and anatomy), plant distribution (incl. phylogeography) and plant functional ecology (ecophysiology, population ecology and population genetics, organismic interactions, community ecology, ecosystem ecology). Manuscripts (both original and review articles) on a single topic can be compiled in Special Issues, for which suggestions are welcome. FLORA, the scientific botanical journal with the longest uninterrupted publication sequence (since 1818), considers manuscripts in the above areas which appeal a broad scientific and international readership. Manuscripts focused on floristics and vegetation science will only be considered if they exceed the pure descriptive approach and have relevance for interpreting plant morphology, distribution or ecology. Manuscripts whose content is restricted to purely systematic and nomenclature matters, to geobotanical aspects of only local interest, to pure applications in agri-, horti- or silviculture and pharmacology, and experimental studies dealing exclusively with investigations at the cellular and subcellular level will not be accepted. Manuscripts dealing with comparative and evolutionary aspects of morphology, anatomy and development are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Standardization of two forms of the CRENATE (Pooideae Benth.) phytolith morphotype and their potential for environmental reconstructions Heteroblasty in Conchocarpus heterophyllus (A.St.-Hil.) Kallunki & Pirani (Rutaceae): An approach of leaf development from the unifoliolate leaves Bioclimatic variables affect seed mass and seedling traits of four Gymnocalycium (Cactaceae) species along elevational gradients Biosystematics studies of endemic Thlaspi violascens Boiss. and T. densiflorum Boiss. & Kotschy: Highlights on molecular and morphological identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1