María Laura Benvenuto , Mara De Rito , Margarita Luisa Osterrieth , Mariana Fernández Honaine
{"title":"分析自然植物群落和农作物的植金石输入量以及土壤硅的可用性(阿根廷东南部潘潘地区)","authors":"María Laura Benvenuto , Mara De Rito , Margarita Luisa Osterrieth , Mariana Fernández Honaine","doi":"10.1016/j.flora.2024.152640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Silica phytoliths constitute an important source of Si to terrestrial environments. Different plant communities contribute varying amounts of phytoliths to soils due to differences in plant taxa. In Pampean region, Argentina, agriculture has largely replaced natural communities like grasslands and wetlands. This replacement affects the specific plant composition of the area, modifies the potential phytolith input from plants to soils, and as a consequence, the soil Si content. Since no study specifically measures the potential phytolith contribution from natural communities and crops in the region, we aimed to quantify and compare phytolith production in natural plant communities and typical crops from Pampean region and its relation to available soil Si content. Three natural communities and three crops were selected. Phytolith content in plant communities was estimated by the phytolith amount produced in plant tissues (calcination technique) and plant biomass, while soil Si was measured by UV–VIS spectrophotometry. Phytolith content differed between natural communities and crops. The communities with the highest phytolith content were those that contained high phytolith-producing species and / or high plant biomass (959.61 ± 95.64 and 665.27 ± 382.38 kg/ha, wheat and \"juncal\", respectively). There were no significant differences in Si content between natural and cropland soils, and phytolith production differences in plant communities were not reflected in the soils. Probably soil genesis, vegetation history and / or management can explain the lack of differences. Continuous monitoring of phytolith production, plant biomass and soil Si content could explain the Si cycle in this region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55156,"journal":{"name":"Flora","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 152640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of phytolith inputs from natural plant communities and crops and soil silicon availability (Southeastern Pampean region, Argentina)\",\"authors\":\"María Laura Benvenuto , Mara De Rito , Margarita Luisa Osterrieth , Mariana Fernández Honaine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.flora.2024.152640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Silica phytoliths constitute an important source of Si to terrestrial environments. Different plant communities contribute varying amounts of phytoliths to soils due to differences in plant taxa. In Pampean region, Argentina, agriculture has largely replaced natural communities like grasslands and wetlands. This replacement affects the specific plant composition of the area, modifies the potential phytolith input from plants to soils, and as a consequence, the soil Si content. Since no study specifically measures the potential phytolith contribution from natural communities and crops in the region, we aimed to quantify and compare phytolith production in natural plant communities and typical crops from Pampean region and its relation to available soil Si content. Three natural communities and three crops were selected. Phytolith content in plant communities was estimated by the phytolith amount produced in plant tissues (calcination technique) and plant biomass, while soil Si was measured by UV–VIS spectrophotometry. Phytolith content differed between natural communities and crops. The communities with the highest phytolith content were those that contained high phytolith-producing species and / or high plant biomass (959.61 ± 95.64 and 665.27 ± 382.38 kg/ha, wheat and \\\"juncal\\\", respectively). There were no significant differences in Si content between natural and cropland soils, and phytolith production differences in plant communities were not reflected in the soils. Probably soil genesis, vegetation history and / or management can explain the lack of differences. Continuous monitoring of phytolith production, plant biomass and soil Si content could explain the Si cycle in this region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flora\",\"volume\":\"322 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0367253024001920\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flora","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0367253024001920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of phytolith inputs from natural plant communities and crops and soil silicon availability (Southeastern Pampean region, Argentina)
Silica phytoliths constitute an important source of Si to terrestrial environments. Different plant communities contribute varying amounts of phytoliths to soils due to differences in plant taxa. In Pampean region, Argentina, agriculture has largely replaced natural communities like grasslands and wetlands. This replacement affects the specific plant composition of the area, modifies the potential phytolith input from plants to soils, and as a consequence, the soil Si content. Since no study specifically measures the potential phytolith contribution from natural communities and crops in the region, we aimed to quantify and compare phytolith production in natural plant communities and typical crops from Pampean region and its relation to available soil Si content. Three natural communities and three crops were selected. Phytolith content in plant communities was estimated by the phytolith amount produced in plant tissues (calcination technique) and plant biomass, while soil Si was measured by UV–VIS spectrophotometry. Phytolith content differed between natural communities and crops. The communities with the highest phytolith content were those that contained high phytolith-producing species and / or high plant biomass (959.61 ± 95.64 and 665.27 ± 382.38 kg/ha, wheat and "juncal", respectively). There were no significant differences in Si content between natural and cropland soils, and phytolith production differences in plant communities were not reflected in the soils. Probably soil genesis, vegetation history and / or management can explain the lack of differences. Continuous monitoring of phytolith production, plant biomass and soil Si content could explain the Si cycle in this region.
期刊介绍:
FLORA publishes original contributions and review articles on plant structure (morphology and anatomy), plant distribution (incl. phylogeography) and plant functional ecology (ecophysiology, population ecology and population genetics, organismic interactions, community ecology, ecosystem ecology). Manuscripts (both original and review articles) on a single topic can be compiled in Special Issues, for which suggestions are welcome.
FLORA, the scientific botanical journal with the longest uninterrupted publication sequence (since 1818), considers manuscripts in the above areas which appeal a broad scientific and international readership. Manuscripts focused on floristics and vegetation science will only be considered if they exceed the pure descriptive approach and have relevance for interpreting plant morphology, distribution or ecology. Manuscripts whose content is restricted to purely systematic and nomenclature matters, to geobotanical aspects of only local interest, to pure applications in agri-, horti- or silviculture and pharmacology, and experimental studies dealing exclusively with investigations at the cellular and subcellular level will not be accepted. Manuscripts dealing with comparative and evolutionary aspects of morphology, anatomy and development are welcome.