黑钱之外:美国东海岸反对海上风电的信息补贴和复杂网络

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103829
Isaac Slevin, William Kattrup, Charlotte Marcil, J. Timmons Roberts
{"title":"黑钱之外:美国东海岸反对海上风电的信息补贴和复杂网络","authors":"Isaac Slevin,&nbsp;William Kattrup,&nbsp;Charlotte Marcil,&nbsp;J. Timmons Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A new, more aggressive stage of opposition to offshore wind energy has arisen in the United States. In this article, we demonstrate how the discourses and strategies of local opposition groups are influenced by relationships with national-level groups and fossil fuel interests. East Coast offshore wind opposition groups are not well-characterized by the previous literature on local renewables acceptance – which describes them as grassroots – nor the top-down depiction of national-level fossil fuel influence, which portrays them as inorganic “astroturf” organizations. We focus on organizations' networks and discourses. First, we map the network of opposition to offshore wind on the U.S. East Coast, which includes novel, local anti-turbine groups, known climate denial think tanks, fossil fuel interests, law firms, and representatives of the commercial fishing industry. Second, we assess claims made by an anti-offshore wind group in New England using two academic typologies. We discover that local groups receive massive and varied “information subsidies” from the think tanks, allowing them to spread numerous claims emphasizing the downsides of offshore wind. We conclude with a discussion of how this nascent network and these misleading discourses pose dire threats to renewable energy development in the United States.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103829"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond dark money: Information subsidies and complex networks of opposition to offshore wind on the U.S. East Coast\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Slevin,&nbsp;William Kattrup,&nbsp;Charlotte Marcil,&nbsp;J. Timmons Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A new, more aggressive stage of opposition to offshore wind energy has arisen in the United States. In this article, we demonstrate how the discourses and strategies of local opposition groups are influenced by relationships with national-level groups and fossil fuel interests. East Coast offshore wind opposition groups are not well-characterized by the previous literature on local renewables acceptance – which describes them as grassroots – nor the top-down depiction of national-level fossil fuel influence, which portrays them as inorganic “astroturf” organizations. We focus on organizations' networks and discourses. First, we map the network of opposition to offshore wind on the U.S. East Coast, which includes novel, local anti-turbine groups, known climate denial think tanks, fossil fuel interests, law firms, and representatives of the commercial fishing industry. Second, we assess claims made by an anti-offshore wind group in New England using two academic typologies. We discover that local groups receive massive and varied “information subsidies” from the think tanks, allowing them to spread numerous claims emphasizing the downsides of offshore wind. We conclude with a discussion of how this nascent network and these misleading discourses pose dire threats to renewable energy development in the United States.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004201\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,反对近海风能的浪潮进入了一个新的、更加激进的阶段。在本文中,我们将展示地方反对团体的言论和策略如何受到与国家级团体和化石燃料利益集团关系的影响。东海岸离岸风能反对组织既没有被以往有关地方可再生能源接受度的文献描述为草根组织,也没有被国家级化石燃料影响力的自上而下的描述描绘为无机的 "stroturf "组织。我们重点关注这些组织的网络和言论。首先,我们绘制了美国东海岸反对海上风电的网络图,其中包括小说、地方反涡轮机组织、知名气候否认智库、化石燃料利益集团、律师事务所和商业捕鱼业代表。其次,我们利用两种学术类型学评估了新英格兰反海上风电团体的主张。我们发现,当地团体从智库那里获得了大量不同的 "信息补贴",这使他们能够散布大量强调海上风电弊端的言论。最后,我们将讨论这一新兴网络和这些误导性言论如何对美国的可再生能源发展构成严重威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond dark money: Information subsidies and complex networks of opposition to offshore wind on the U.S. East Coast
A new, more aggressive stage of opposition to offshore wind energy has arisen in the United States. In this article, we demonstrate how the discourses and strategies of local opposition groups are influenced by relationships with national-level groups and fossil fuel interests. East Coast offshore wind opposition groups are not well-characterized by the previous literature on local renewables acceptance – which describes them as grassroots – nor the top-down depiction of national-level fossil fuel influence, which portrays them as inorganic “astroturf” organizations. We focus on organizations' networks and discourses. First, we map the network of opposition to offshore wind on the U.S. East Coast, which includes novel, local anti-turbine groups, known climate denial think tanks, fossil fuel interests, law firms, and representatives of the commercial fishing industry. Second, we assess claims made by an anti-offshore wind group in New England using two academic typologies. We discover that local groups receive massive and varied “information subsidies” from the think tanks, allowing them to spread numerous claims emphasizing the downsides of offshore wind. We conclude with a discussion of how this nascent network and these misleading discourses pose dire threats to renewable energy development in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Desert or garden? Energy sacrifice zones, territorial affordances and competing visions for post-coal landscapes: The case of the Czechoslovak Army Mine Retrofit information challenges and potential solutions: Perspectives of households, retrofit professionals and local policy makers in the United Kingdom Institutional entrepreneuring for energy poverty: The role of boundary work in developing a collaborative product-service system for household appliances A technology to solve the water-energy-food crisis? Mapping sociotechnical configurations of agrivoltaics using Q-methodology Justice or just plans? Reviewing the energy transition strategy of Brazil's Ceará state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1