Kuang-Cheng Andy Wang , Ping-Yao Chou , Wen-Jung Liang
{"title":"成本不对称、商品税和反倾销政策","authors":"Kuang-Cheng Andy Wang , Ping-Yao Chou , Wen-Jung Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine how the presence of a commodity tax affects the superiority of an antidumping duty and a price undertaking policy under cost asymmetry between the foreign and domestic firms. We obtain several interesting results as follows. First, the domestic welfare under a price undertaking is higher than that under an antidumping duty, if the domestic firm is more efficient than the foreign firm and the normal value is large. Second, the presence of a commodity tax usually leads the domestic government to be more likely to choose an antidumping duty. Third, the presence of a commodity tax leads the foreign firm to prefer a price undertaking to an antidumping duty. The first two results show that the domestic firm's lower efficiency and the commodity tax can explain why the cases involving adopting a price undertaking are far fewer than those concerned with an antidumping duty in the real world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103705"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost asymmetry, commodity taxes and antidumping policies\",\"authors\":\"Kuang-Cheng Andy Wang , Ping-Yao Chou , Wen-Jung Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We examine how the presence of a commodity tax affects the superiority of an antidumping duty and a price undertaking policy under cost asymmetry between the foreign and domestic firms. We obtain several interesting results as follows. First, the domestic welfare under a price undertaking is higher than that under an antidumping duty, if the domestic firm is more efficient than the foreign firm and the normal value is large. Second, the presence of a commodity tax usually leads the domestic government to be more likely to choose an antidumping duty. Third, the presence of a commodity tax leads the foreign firm to prefer a price undertaking to an antidumping duty. The first two results show that the domestic firm's lower efficiency and the commodity tax can explain why the cases involving adopting a price undertaking are far fewer than those concerned with an antidumping duty in the real world.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105905602400697X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105905602400697X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cost asymmetry, commodity taxes and antidumping policies
We examine how the presence of a commodity tax affects the superiority of an antidumping duty and a price undertaking policy under cost asymmetry between the foreign and domestic firms. We obtain several interesting results as follows. First, the domestic welfare under a price undertaking is higher than that under an antidumping duty, if the domestic firm is more efficient than the foreign firm and the normal value is large. Second, the presence of a commodity tax usually leads the domestic government to be more likely to choose an antidumping duty. Third, the presence of a commodity tax leads the foreign firm to prefer a price undertaking to an antidumping duty. The first two results show that the domestic firm's lower efficiency and the commodity tax can explain why the cases involving adopting a price undertaking are far fewer than those concerned with an antidumping duty in the real world.
期刊介绍:
The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.