用纳米磷肥处理过的土壤中的磷迁移模型

Kartik Jadav, Maheshwar Durgam, Monisha Perli, Damodhara Rao Mailapalli
{"title":"用纳米磷肥处理过的土壤中的磷迁移模型","authors":"Kartik Jadav,&nbsp;Maheshwar Durgam,&nbsp;Monisha Perli,&nbsp;Damodhara Rao Mailapalli","doi":"10.1016/j.plana.2024.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nanofertilizers play a promising role in crop production by reducing the application amount and increasing the application efficiency. Understanding the transport of plant nutrients in the soil is crucial for effectively managing nanofertilizer applications and minimizing their impact on the environment. This study investigated phosphorus transport in agricultural soil using 15-day and 30-day soil column experiment data from 2017 and 2018. Two soil column experiments were conducted using nano-rock phosphate, nano-hydroxyapatite fertilizers, and a commercial fertilizer (single super phosphate). The Hydrus 1D model was used to understand the transport mechanism of nano and bulk phosphorus fertilizers. Water and dissolved phosphorus fluxes were simulated using leachate data, and key phosphorus transport parameters, including longitudinal dispersivity and the diffusion coefficient, were determined. The Hydrus-1D model accurately captured leachate dynamics (R² = 0.82–0.99 and MAE = 0.38–0.56 cm/days). Phosphorus transport performed well for bulk fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.86–0.90, MAE = 0.08–0.19 ppm, and RMSE = 0.14–0.36 ppm). However, mixed results were obtained while validating nano fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.31–0.98, MAE = 0.046–0.41 ppm, and RMSE = 0.084–0.35 ppm). For nanofertilizers, the longitudinal dispersivity and distribution coefficient were reduced by 80.71 % and 19.20 %, respectively, compared to commercial fertilizers. The lower longitudinal dispersivity indicates that nano fertilizers release nutrients more slowly than bulk fertilizers. Similarly, a smaller distribution coefficient suggests that nano-phosphorus fertilizers are more concentrated in specific areas within the soil, leading to slower and more controlled nutrient distribution. Additionally, the leachate's observed total phosphorus concentration and the soil profile's phosphorus concentration support the study findings. The results indicate that the transport mechanism of nano and bulk fertilizers in soil is distinct and should be treated separately. This study's findings will contribute to developing optimal fertilizer application strategies for nano-phosphorus fertilizers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101029,"journal":{"name":"Plant Nano Biology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phosphorus transport modeling in soils treated with nano-phosphorus fertilizers\",\"authors\":\"Kartik Jadav,&nbsp;Maheshwar Durgam,&nbsp;Monisha Perli,&nbsp;Damodhara Rao Mailapalli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plana.2024.100112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nanofertilizers play a promising role in crop production by reducing the application amount and increasing the application efficiency. Understanding the transport of plant nutrients in the soil is crucial for effectively managing nanofertilizer applications and minimizing their impact on the environment. This study investigated phosphorus transport in agricultural soil using 15-day and 30-day soil column experiment data from 2017 and 2018. Two soil column experiments were conducted using nano-rock phosphate, nano-hydroxyapatite fertilizers, and a commercial fertilizer (single super phosphate). The Hydrus 1D model was used to understand the transport mechanism of nano and bulk phosphorus fertilizers. Water and dissolved phosphorus fluxes were simulated using leachate data, and key phosphorus transport parameters, including longitudinal dispersivity and the diffusion coefficient, were determined. The Hydrus-1D model accurately captured leachate dynamics (R² = 0.82–0.99 and MAE = 0.38–0.56 cm/days). Phosphorus transport performed well for bulk fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.86–0.90, MAE = 0.08–0.19 ppm, and RMSE = 0.14–0.36 ppm). However, mixed results were obtained while validating nano fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.31–0.98, MAE = 0.046–0.41 ppm, and RMSE = 0.084–0.35 ppm). For nanofertilizers, the longitudinal dispersivity and distribution coefficient were reduced by 80.71 % and 19.20 %, respectively, compared to commercial fertilizers. The lower longitudinal dispersivity indicates that nano fertilizers release nutrients more slowly than bulk fertilizers. Similarly, a smaller distribution coefficient suggests that nano-phosphorus fertilizers are more concentrated in specific areas within the soil, leading to slower and more controlled nutrient distribution. Additionally, the leachate's observed total phosphorus concentration and the soil profile's phosphorus concentration support the study findings. The results indicate that the transport mechanism of nano and bulk fertilizers in soil is distinct and should be treated separately. This study's findings will contribute to developing optimal fertilizer application strategies for nano-phosphorus fertilizers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Nano Biology\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Nano Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277311112400055X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Nano Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277311112400055X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纳米肥料通过减少施用量和提高施用效率,在作物生产中发挥着大有可为的作用。了解植物养分在土壤中的迁移对于有效管理纳米肥料的施用和最大限度地减少其对环境的影响至关重要。本研究利用 2017 年和 2018 年的 15 天和 30 天土壤柱实验数据研究了农业土壤中磷的迁移。使用纳米磷矿石、纳米羟基磷灰石肥料和商业肥料(单一过磷酸钙)进行了两次土壤柱实验。利用水文一维模型了解了纳米磷肥和散装磷肥的迁移机制。利用沥滤液数据模拟了水和溶解磷的通量,并确定了包括纵向分散性和扩散系数在内的关键磷迁移参数。Hydrus-1D 模型准确捕捉了沥滤液的动态变化(R² = 0.82-0.99 和 MAE = 0.38-0.56 厘米/天)。磷迁移在散装化肥处理中表现良好(R² = 0.86-0.90, MAE = 0.08-0.19 ppm, RMSE = 0.14-0.36 ppm)。然而,纳米肥料处理的验证结果不一(R² = 0.31-0.98, MAE = 0.046-0.41 ppm, RMSE = 0.084-0.35 ppm)。与商品肥料相比,纳米肥料的纵向分散性和分布系数分别降低了 80.71 % 和 19.20 %。较低的纵向分散性表明,纳米肥料比散装肥料释放养分的速度更慢。同样,较小的分布系数表明纳米磷肥更集中于土壤中的特定区域,从而导致养分分布更慢、更可控。此外,沥滤液中观察到的总磷浓度和土壤剖面中的磷浓度也支持研究结果。研究结果表明,纳米肥料和散装肥料在土壤中的迁移机制是不同的,应分别对待。这项研究的结果将有助于制定纳米磷肥的最佳施肥策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phosphorus transport modeling in soils treated with nano-phosphorus fertilizers
Nanofertilizers play a promising role in crop production by reducing the application amount and increasing the application efficiency. Understanding the transport of plant nutrients in the soil is crucial for effectively managing nanofertilizer applications and minimizing their impact on the environment. This study investigated phosphorus transport in agricultural soil using 15-day and 30-day soil column experiment data from 2017 and 2018. Two soil column experiments were conducted using nano-rock phosphate, nano-hydroxyapatite fertilizers, and a commercial fertilizer (single super phosphate). The Hydrus 1D model was used to understand the transport mechanism of nano and bulk phosphorus fertilizers. Water and dissolved phosphorus fluxes were simulated using leachate data, and key phosphorus transport parameters, including longitudinal dispersivity and the diffusion coefficient, were determined. The Hydrus-1D model accurately captured leachate dynamics (R² = 0.82–0.99 and MAE = 0.38–0.56 cm/days). Phosphorus transport performed well for bulk fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.86–0.90, MAE = 0.08–0.19 ppm, and RMSE = 0.14–0.36 ppm). However, mixed results were obtained while validating nano fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.31–0.98, MAE = 0.046–0.41 ppm, and RMSE = 0.084–0.35 ppm). For nanofertilizers, the longitudinal dispersivity and distribution coefficient were reduced by 80.71 % and 19.20 %, respectively, compared to commercial fertilizers. The lower longitudinal dispersivity indicates that nano fertilizers release nutrients more slowly than bulk fertilizers. Similarly, a smaller distribution coefficient suggests that nano-phosphorus fertilizers are more concentrated in specific areas within the soil, leading to slower and more controlled nutrient distribution. Additionally, the leachate's observed total phosphorus concentration and the soil profile's phosphorus concentration support the study findings. The results indicate that the transport mechanism of nano and bulk fertilizers in soil is distinct and should be treated separately. This study's findings will contribute to developing optimal fertilizer application strategies for nano-phosphorus fertilizers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization of AgNPs production from Fusarium oxysporum H39 and its effectiveness as nanopesticides facing Pectobacterium carotovorum Investigate growth of Paris polyphylla under synergic effects of CeO2 and SiO2 using as fertilizers Green approaches for the synthesis of silver nanoparticle and its augmentation in Seed. germination, growth, and antioxidant level in Capsicum annuum L. Impact of zinc oxide nanoparticles on biosynthesis of thymoquinone in cell cultures of Nigella sativa Harnessing the potential of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their derivatives as nanofertilizers: Trends and perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1