多跨高速铁路简支桥梁桥堤过渡区轨道结构的新型抗震设计

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119349
Lizhong Jiang , Bufan Zhong , Yuntai Zhang , Wangbao Zhou , Zhipeng Lai
{"title":"多跨高速铁路简支桥梁桥堤过渡区轨道结构的新型抗震设计","authors":"Lizhong Jiang ,&nbsp;Bufan Zhong ,&nbsp;Yuntai Zhang ,&nbsp;Wangbao Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhipeng Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper addresses the lack of current Chinese seismic-resistant design principles and methods for track structures in the bridge-embankment transition zone of multi-span High-Speed Railway Simply Supported Bridges (HSRSBs), an area prone to high damage risk. To decouple the seismic-resistant design of track structures from bridge structures, the paper introduces the design principle of Negligible Change in Fundamental Frequency (NCF). Building on this principle, the paper proposes an easily implementable design approach called Friction Slab Extension (FSE), which reduces track internal forces by extending the length of the friction slab without requiring additional seismic-resistant equipment. Through numerical seismic simulations validated by experimental data, the effectiveness of FSE in reducing internal forces in the track of the bridge-embankment transition zone is confirmed. The study also determines the Recommended Length of Friction Slab (RLFS) for practical engineering implementation based on the response reduction limit. Seismic vulnerability analyses demonstrate that adopting the FSE with RLFS effectively mitigates the risk of track structure failure, evidenced by a 15 % reduction in exceedance probabilities under considerable levels. Importantly, this approach ensures that the seismic performance of the bridge components remains unaffected, in line with the expectations of the NCF principle. These findings underscore the efficacy of the FSE and the rationality of the NCF principle, offering valuable guidance for future design developments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"324 ","pages":"Article 119349"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel seismic-resistant design for track structures in the bridge-embankment transition zone of multi-span high-speed railways simply supported bridges\",\"authors\":\"Lizhong Jiang ,&nbsp;Bufan Zhong ,&nbsp;Yuntai Zhang ,&nbsp;Wangbao Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhipeng Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper addresses the lack of current Chinese seismic-resistant design principles and methods for track structures in the bridge-embankment transition zone of multi-span High-Speed Railway Simply Supported Bridges (HSRSBs), an area prone to high damage risk. To decouple the seismic-resistant design of track structures from bridge structures, the paper introduces the design principle of Negligible Change in Fundamental Frequency (NCF). Building on this principle, the paper proposes an easily implementable design approach called Friction Slab Extension (FSE), which reduces track internal forces by extending the length of the friction slab without requiring additional seismic-resistant equipment. Through numerical seismic simulations validated by experimental data, the effectiveness of FSE in reducing internal forces in the track of the bridge-embankment transition zone is confirmed. The study also determines the Recommended Length of Friction Slab (RLFS) for practical engineering implementation based on the response reduction limit. Seismic vulnerability analyses demonstrate that adopting the FSE with RLFS effectively mitigates the risk of track structure failure, evidenced by a 15 % reduction in exceedance probabilities under considerable levels. Importantly, this approach ensures that the seismic performance of the bridge components remains unaffected, in line with the expectations of the NCF principle. These findings underscore the efficacy of the FSE and the rationality of the NCF principle, offering valuable guidance for future design developments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"324 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624019114\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624019114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多跨高速铁路简支梁桥(HSRSB)的桥-堤过渡区是易发生高风险破坏的区域,本文针对该区域的轨道结构缺乏现行的中国抗震设计原则和方法。为了使轨道结构的抗震设计与桥梁结构脱钩,本文引入了基频微小变化(Negligible Change in Fundamental Frequency,NCF)设计原则。在此原则基础上,本文提出了一种易于实施的设计方法,即摩擦板延伸(FSE),通过延长摩擦板的长度来降低轨道内力,而无需额外的抗震设备。通过试验数据验证的地震数值模拟,证实了 FSE 在减少桥梁-堤坝过渡区轨道内力方面的有效性。研究还根据反应减弱极限确定了实际工程实施的摩擦板推荐长度(RLFS)。地震脆弱性分析表明,采用带 RLFS 的 FSE 可以有效降低轨道结构破坏的风险,在相当高的水平下,超限概率降低了 15%。重要的是,这种方法确保桥梁部件的抗震性能不受影响,符合 NCF 原则的预期。这些发现强调了 FSE 的有效性和 NCF 原则的合理性,为未来的设计开发提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel seismic-resistant design for track structures in the bridge-embankment transition zone of multi-span high-speed railways simply supported bridges
This paper addresses the lack of current Chinese seismic-resistant design principles and methods for track structures in the bridge-embankment transition zone of multi-span High-Speed Railway Simply Supported Bridges (HSRSBs), an area prone to high damage risk. To decouple the seismic-resistant design of track structures from bridge structures, the paper introduces the design principle of Negligible Change in Fundamental Frequency (NCF). Building on this principle, the paper proposes an easily implementable design approach called Friction Slab Extension (FSE), which reduces track internal forces by extending the length of the friction slab without requiring additional seismic-resistant equipment. Through numerical seismic simulations validated by experimental data, the effectiveness of FSE in reducing internal forces in the track of the bridge-embankment transition zone is confirmed. The study also determines the Recommended Length of Friction Slab (RLFS) for practical engineering implementation based on the response reduction limit. Seismic vulnerability analyses demonstrate that adopting the FSE with RLFS effectively mitigates the risk of track structure failure, evidenced by a 15 % reduction in exceedance probabilities under considerable levels. Importantly, this approach ensures that the seismic performance of the bridge components remains unaffected, in line with the expectations of the NCF principle. These findings underscore the efficacy of the FSE and the rationality of the NCF principle, offering valuable guidance for future design developments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Shear behaviour of deep beams strengthened with high-strength fiber reinforced concrete jackets Design of 3D printed concrete masonry for wall structures: Mechanical behavior and strength calculation methods under various loads Effect of high-strength SCC with and without steel fibres on the shear behaviour of dry joints in PCSBs Utilizing realistic loading histories for the calibration of nonlinear components in seismic analysis Physically-based collapse failure criteria in progressive collapse analyses of random-parameter multi-story RC structures subjected to column removal scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1