{"title":"评估中国可持续发展的进展及其对人类福祉的影响","authors":"Chaoyue Yu, Wencang Shen, Zhengfeng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rising call for prioritizing specific sustainable development goals (SDGs) over holistic SDG achievement may worsen development imbalances and limit the enhancement of human well-being. It is essential to assess the progress and evenness of SDGs across time and space, as well as their impact on human well-being. Here, we assessed 16 SDGs for 31 provinces in China over the period 2000–2020, evaluated the SDG index (SDGI) and SDG evenness (SDGE), and explored the impact of SDGE and GDP on human well-being in terms of basic needs, security needs, and spiritual needs. Our findings indicate improvements in both SDGI and SDGE at the national and provincial levels. Most provinces witnessed progress across the majority of SDGs, except SDG 10 (reduced inequalities) and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production). Over the past two decades, eastern China consistently exhibited a higher SDGI compared to western China. However, the region demonstrating the best SDGE performance gradually shifted from the eastern coastal region to northern China. SDGs 1 (no poverty), 3 (good health and well-being), 8 (decent work and economic growth), and 16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions) made significant contributions to the enhancement of SDGI and SDGE. Furthermore, economic development and the improvement of SDGE significantly influenced human well-being, albeit with some variations. Both of them positively affected health but also exacerbated environmental challenges. For gender equality, SDGE had a positive impact, while GDP had a negative influence. To achieve sustainable development, it is imperative to promote the decoupling of development from resource consumption and environmental pollution. Additionally, comprehensive measures should be implemented to enhance the equity and inclusiveness of economic development outcomes. This study contributes to the comprehensive achievement of the SDGs and serves as a valuable reference for assessing sustainable development paths and optimizing development patterns globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107729"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing progress toward sustainable development in China and its impact on human well-being\",\"authors\":\"Chaoyue Yu, Wencang Shen, Zhengfeng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rising call for prioritizing specific sustainable development goals (SDGs) over holistic SDG achievement may worsen development imbalances and limit the enhancement of human well-being. It is essential to assess the progress and evenness of SDGs across time and space, as well as their impact on human well-being. Here, we assessed 16 SDGs for 31 provinces in China over the period 2000–2020, evaluated the SDG index (SDGI) and SDG evenness (SDGE), and explored the impact of SDGE and GDP on human well-being in terms of basic needs, security needs, and spiritual needs. Our findings indicate improvements in both SDGI and SDGE at the national and provincial levels. Most provinces witnessed progress across the majority of SDGs, except SDG 10 (reduced inequalities) and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production). Over the past two decades, eastern China consistently exhibited a higher SDGI compared to western China. However, the region demonstrating the best SDGE performance gradually shifted from the eastern coastal region to northern China. SDGs 1 (no poverty), 3 (good health and well-being), 8 (decent work and economic growth), and 16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions) made significant contributions to the enhancement of SDGI and SDGE. Furthermore, economic development and the improvement of SDGE significantly influenced human well-being, albeit with some variations. Both of them positively affected health but also exacerbated environmental challenges. For gender equality, SDGE had a positive impact, while GDP had a negative influence. To achieve sustainable development, it is imperative to promote the decoupling of development from resource consumption and environmental pollution. Additionally, comprehensive measures should be implemented to enhance the equity and inclusiveness of economic development outcomes. This study contributes to the comprehensive achievement of the SDGs and serves as a valuable reference for assessing sustainable development paths and optimizing development patterns globally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003160\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003160","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing progress toward sustainable development in China and its impact on human well-being
The rising call for prioritizing specific sustainable development goals (SDGs) over holistic SDG achievement may worsen development imbalances and limit the enhancement of human well-being. It is essential to assess the progress and evenness of SDGs across time and space, as well as their impact on human well-being. Here, we assessed 16 SDGs for 31 provinces in China over the period 2000–2020, evaluated the SDG index (SDGI) and SDG evenness (SDGE), and explored the impact of SDGE and GDP on human well-being in terms of basic needs, security needs, and spiritual needs. Our findings indicate improvements in both SDGI and SDGE at the national and provincial levels. Most provinces witnessed progress across the majority of SDGs, except SDG 10 (reduced inequalities) and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production). Over the past two decades, eastern China consistently exhibited a higher SDGI compared to western China. However, the region demonstrating the best SDGE performance gradually shifted from the eastern coastal region to northern China. SDGs 1 (no poverty), 3 (good health and well-being), 8 (decent work and economic growth), and 16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions) made significant contributions to the enhancement of SDGI and SDGE. Furthermore, economic development and the improvement of SDGE significantly influenced human well-being, albeit with some variations. Both of them positively affected health but also exacerbated environmental challenges. For gender equality, SDGE had a positive impact, while GDP had a negative influence. To achieve sustainable development, it is imperative to promote the decoupling of development from resource consumption and environmental pollution. Additionally, comprehensive measures should be implemented to enhance the equity and inclusiveness of economic development outcomes. This study contributes to the comprehensive achievement of the SDGs and serves as a valuable reference for assessing sustainable development paths and optimizing development patterns globally.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.