接受有创通气患者的性别、种族和民族与静脉镇静剂使用之间的关系

Sarah L. Walker , Federico Angriman MD, PhD , Lisa Burry PharmD, PhD , Leo Anthony Celi MD, MPH , Kirsten M. Fiest PhD , Judy Gichoya MD , Alistair Johnson PhD , Kuan Liu PhD , Sangeeta Mehta MD , Georgiana Roman-Sarita RRT , Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari PhD , Thanh-Giang T. Vu MD , Elizabeth L. Whitlock MD , George Tomlinson PhD , Christopher J. Yarnell MD, PhD
{"title":"接受有创通气患者的性别、种族和民族与静脉镇静剂使用之间的关系","authors":"Sarah L. Walker ,&nbsp;Federico Angriman MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lisa Burry PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Leo Anthony Celi MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Kirsten M. Fiest PhD ,&nbsp;Judy Gichoya MD ,&nbsp;Alistair Johnson PhD ,&nbsp;Kuan Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Sangeeta Mehta MD ,&nbsp;Georgiana Roman-Sarita RRT ,&nbsp;Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari PhD ,&nbsp;Thanh-Giang T. Vu MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Whitlock MD ,&nbsp;George Tomlinson PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Yarnell MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>IV sedation is an important tool for managing patients receiving invasive ventilation, yet excess sedation is harmful, and dosing could be influenced by implicit bias.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What are the associations between sex or race and ethnicity and sedation practices?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults receiving invasive ventilation for ≥ 24 hours using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Version IV (2008-2019) database from Boston, Massachusetts. We used a repeated-measures design (4-hour intervals) to study the association between sex (female or male) or race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White) and sedation outcomes. Sedation outcomes included sedative use (propofol, benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine) and minimum sedation score. We categorized sedative use as follows: no sedative and then lowest, second, third, and highest quartiles of sedative dose. We adjusted for covariates with multilevel Bayesian proportional odds modeling and reported ORs with 95% credible intervals (CrIs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We studied 6,764 patients: 43% female; 3.5% Asian, 12% Black, 4.5% Hispanic, and 80% White. Benzodiazepines were administered to 2,334 patients (36%). Black patients received benzodiazepines less often and at lower doses than White patients (more benzodiazepine: OR, 0.66; 95% CrI, 0.49-0.92). Propofol was administered to 3,865 patients (57%). Female patients received propofol less often and at lower doses than male patients (more propofol: OR, 0.72; 95% CrI, 0.61-0.86). Dexmedetomidine was administered to 1,439 patients (21%), and use was similar across sex or race and ethnicity. Female patients were less sedated than male patients (deeper sedation: OR, 0.71; 95% CrI, 0.62-0.81), and Black patients were more sedated than White patients (more sedated: OR, 1.28; 95% CrI, 1.05-1.55).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Among patients receiving invasive ventilation for at least 24 hours, IV sedation and attained sedation levels varied by sex and by race and ethnicity. Adherence to sedation guidelines may improve equity in sedation management for critically ill patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Sex and Race and Ethnicity and IV Sedation Use in Patients Receiving Invasive Ventilation\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L. Walker ,&nbsp;Federico Angriman MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lisa Burry PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Leo Anthony Celi MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Kirsten M. Fiest PhD ,&nbsp;Judy Gichoya MD ,&nbsp;Alistair Johnson PhD ,&nbsp;Kuan Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Sangeeta Mehta MD ,&nbsp;Georgiana Roman-Sarita RRT ,&nbsp;Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari PhD ,&nbsp;Thanh-Giang T. Vu MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Whitlock MD ,&nbsp;George Tomlinson PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Yarnell MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>IV sedation is an important tool for managing patients receiving invasive ventilation, yet excess sedation is harmful, and dosing could be influenced by implicit bias.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What are the associations between sex or race and ethnicity and sedation practices?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults receiving invasive ventilation for ≥ 24 hours using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Version IV (2008-2019) database from Boston, Massachusetts. We used a repeated-measures design (4-hour intervals) to study the association between sex (female or male) or race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White) and sedation outcomes. Sedation outcomes included sedative use (propofol, benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine) and minimum sedation score. We categorized sedative use as follows: no sedative and then lowest, second, third, and highest quartiles of sedative dose. We adjusted for covariates with multilevel Bayesian proportional odds modeling and reported ORs with 95% credible intervals (CrIs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We studied 6,764 patients: 43% female; 3.5% Asian, 12% Black, 4.5% Hispanic, and 80% White. Benzodiazepines were administered to 2,334 patients (36%). Black patients received benzodiazepines less often and at lower doses than White patients (more benzodiazepine: OR, 0.66; 95% CrI, 0.49-0.92). Propofol was administered to 3,865 patients (57%). Female patients received propofol less often and at lower doses than male patients (more propofol: OR, 0.72; 95% CrI, 0.61-0.86). Dexmedetomidine was administered to 1,439 patients (21%), and use was similar across sex or race and ethnicity. Female patients were less sedated than male patients (deeper sedation: OR, 0.71; 95% CrI, 0.62-0.81), and Black patients were more sedated than White patients (more sedated: OR, 1.28; 95% CrI, 1.05-1.55).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Among patients receiving invasive ventilation for at least 24 hours, IV sedation and attained sedation levels varied by sex and by race and ethnicity. Adherence to sedation guidelines may improve equity in sedation management for critically ill patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHEST critical care\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHEST critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景IV镇静是管理接受有创通气患者的重要工具,但过度镇静是有害的,而且剂量可能会受到隐性偏见的影响。研究问题性别或种族和民族与镇静方法之间存在哪些关联? 研究设计和方法我们使用马萨诸塞州波士顿市的重症监护医疗信息市场第四版(2008-2019 年)数据库,对接受有创通气时间≥ 24 小时的成人进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究。我们采用重复测量设计(4 小时间隔)来研究性别(女性或男性)或种族和民族(亚洲人、黑人、西班牙裔、白人)与镇静结果之间的关系。镇静结果包括镇静剂使用(异丙酚、苯二氮卓、右美托咪定)和最低镇静评分。我们对镇静剂的使用进行了如下分类:无镇静剂,然后是镇静剂剂量的最低、第二、第三和最高四分位数。我们采用多层次贝叶斯比例几率模型对协变量进行了调整,并报告了ORs及95%可信区间(CrIs):女性占 43%,亚裔占 3.5%,黑人占 12%,西班牙裔占 4.5%,白人占 80%。2,334 名患者(36%)服用了苯二氮卓类药物。黑人患者使用苯二氮卓的频率和剂量低于白人患者(更多苯二氮卓:OR,0.66;95% CrI,0.49-0.92)。3865名患者(57%)使用了异丙酚。与男性患者相比,女性患者接受异丙酚的频率和剂量较低(异丙酚用量更多:OR,0.72;95% CrI,0.61-0.86)。1,439名患者(21%)使用了右美托咪定,不同性别、种族和民族的使用情况相似。女性患者的镇静程度低于男性患者(镇静程度更深:OR,0.71;95% CrI,0.62-0.81),黑人患者的镇静程度高于白人患者(镇静程度更高:OR,1.28;95% CrI,1.05-1.55)。遵守镇静指南可提高重症患者镇静管理的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Sex and Race and Ethnicity and IV Sedation Use in Patients Receiving Invasive Ventilation

Background

IV sedation is an important tool for managing patients receiving invasive ventilation, yet excess sedation is harmful, and dosing could be influenced by implicit bias.

Research Question

What are the associations between sex or race and ethnicity and sedation practices?

Study Design and Methods

We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults receiving invasive ventilation for ≥ 24 hours using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Version IV (2008-2019) database from Boston, Massachusetts. We used a repeated-measures design (4-hour intervals) to study the association between sex (female or male) or race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White) and sedation outcomes. Sedation outcomes included sedative use (propofol, benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine) and minimum sedation score. We categorized sedative use as follows: no sedative and then lowest, second, third, and highest quartiles of sedative dose. We adjusted for covariates with multilevel Bayesian proportional odds modeling and reported ORs with 95% credible intervals (CrIs).

Results

We studied 6,764 patients: 43% female; 3.5% Asian, 12% Black, 4.5% Hispanic, and 80% White. Benzodiazepines were administered to 2,334 patients (36%). Black patients received benzodiazepines less often and at lower doses than White patients (more benzodiazepine: OR, 0.66; 95% CrI, 0.49-0.92). Propofol was administered to 3,865 patients (57%). Female patients received propofol less often and at lower doses than male patients (more propofol: OR, 0.72; 95% CrI, 0.61-0.86). Dexmedetomidine was administered to 1,439 patients (21%), and use was similar across sex or race and ethnicity. Female patients were less sedated than male patients (deeper sedation: OR, 0.71; 95% CrI, 0.62-0.81), and Black patients were more sedated than White patients (more sedated: OR, 1.28; 95% CrI, 1.05-1.55).

Interpretation

Among patients receiving invasive ventilation for at least 24 hours, IV sedation and attained sedation levels varied by sex and by race and ethnicity. Adherence to sedation guidelines may improve equity in sedation management for critically ill patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovation and Adaptation in COVID-19 Pandemic Posthospital Discharge Contact and Monitoring in the United States Silent Burdens Prevalence of Inpatient Pulse Oximetry in Operative and Nonoperative Settings Operationalizing the New Global Definition of ARDS Corrigendum to: Psomiadis JS, Khawaja A, Zimmerman J. CHEST Critical Care. 2023;1(3):100022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1