Ignacio Toledo , Emilio Laino , Gregorio Iglesias , Antonio Palazón , Luis Aragonés
{"title":"地方当局还是国家框架?海岸保护政策全球审查","authors":"Ignacio Toledo , Emilio Laino , Gregorio Iglesias , Antonio Palazón , Luis Aragonés","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intensification of human activities and the impacts of climate change are poised to degrade coastal ecosystems significantly in the future, potentially endangering both human populations and infrastructure. In response, many countries have developed strategies over recent decades to combat coastal erosion and flooding. The wide range of physical, economic, and social characteristics across regions has resulted in diverse management approaches. This research aims to identify which countries have enacted laws compelling governmental action against coastal erosion and flooding, which policies detail coastal protection solutions, and which administration level is most effective in implementing these measures. Through a review of coastal protection policies and an analysis of research developments in this field across ten countries, this study reveals significant variations in legislative frameworks. For instance, Germany has stringent laws requiring coastline protection, whereas countries such as Greece and South Korea rely mainly on management recommendations. Additionally, Germany and Japan include provisions for funding these protective measures in their legislation, which is crucial for mitigating conflicts across different government levels. Generally, regional and/or local administrations are favoured for implementing such policies – such as in the USA, Brazil, and Australia – even though establishing a national regulatory framework could enhance coordination. However, most of these regulations date back to the 20th century and fail to incorporate contemporary scientific advancements and emerging concepts in coastal protection. The insights gained from this research are intended to inform coastal planners about the importance of maintaining updated management plans, ultimately aiming to ensure long-term sustainability of coastlines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101119"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local authorities or national frameworks? A global review on coastal protection policies\",\"authors\":\"Ignacio Toledo , Emilio Laino , Gregorio Iglesias , Antonio Palazón , Luis Aragonés\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The intensification of human activities and the impacts of climate change are poised to degrade coastal ecosystems significantly in the future, potentially endangering both human populations and infrastructure. In response, many countries have developed strategies over recent decades to combat coastal erosion and flooding. The wide range of physical, economic, and social characteristics across regions has resulted in diverse management approaches. This research aims to identify which countries have enacted laws compelling governmental action against coastal erosion and flooding, which policies detail coastal protection solutions, and which administration level is most effective in implementing these measures. Through a review of coastal protection policies and an analysis of research developments in this field across ten countries, this study reveals significant variations in legislative frameworks. For instance, Germany has stringent laws requiring coastline protection, whereas countries such as Greece and South Korea rely mainly on management recommendations. Additionally, Germany and Japan include provisions for funding these protective measures in their legislation, which is crucial for mitigating conflicts across different government levels. Generally, regional and/or local administrations are favoured for implementing such policies – such as in the USA, Brazil, and Australia – even though establishing a national regulatory framework could enhance coordination. However, most of these regulations date back to the 20th century and fail to incorporate contemporary scientific advancements and emerging concepts in coastal protection. The insights gained from this research are intended to inform coastal planners about the importance of maintaining updated management plans, ultimately aiming to ensure long-term sustainability of coastlines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Development\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221146452400157X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221146452400157X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Local authorities or national frameworks? A global review on coastal protection policies
The intensification of human activities and the impacts of climate change are poised to degrade coastal ecosystems significantly in the future, potentially endangering both human populations and infrastructure. In response, many countries have developed strategies over recent decades to combat coastal erosion and flooding. The wide range of physical, economic, and social characteristics across regions has resulted in diverse management approaches. This research aims to identify which countries have enacted laws compelling governmental action against coastal erosion and flooding, which policies detail coastal protection solutions, and which administration level is most effective in implementing these measures. Through a review of coastal protection policies and an analysis of research developments in this field across ten countries, this study reveals significant variations in legislative frameworks. For instance, Germany has stringent laws requiring coastline protection, whereas countries such as Greece and South Korea rely mainly on management recommendations. Additionally, Germany and Japan include provisions for funding these protective measures in their legislation, which is crucial for mitigating conflicts across different government levels. Generally, regional and/or local administrations are favoured for implementing such policies – such as in the USA, Brazil, and Australia – even though establishing a national regulatory framework could enhance coordination. However, most of these regulations date back to the 20th century and fail to incorporate contemporary scientific advancements and emerging concepts in coastal protection. The insights gained from this research are intended to inform coastal planners about the importance of maintaining updated management plans, ultimately aiming to ensure long-term sustainability of coastlines.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.