患有轻度至中度哮喘的青少年和成人的亚型流行率和治疗意义:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Chamard Wongsa MD , Pakpoom Wongyikul MD , Piyaporn Chokevittaya MD , Anapat Nititammaluk MD , Kay Khine Soe MD, PhD , Phichayut Phinyo MD, PhD , Jonathan A. Bernstein MD , Torpong Thongngarm MD
{"title":"患有轻度至中度哮喘的青少年和成人的亚型流行率和治疗意义:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Chamard Wongsa MD ,&nbsp;Pakpoom Wongyikul MD ,&nbsp;Piyaporn Chokevittaya MD ,&nbsp;Anapat Nititammaluk MD ,&nbsp;Kay Khine Soe MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Phichayut Phinyo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Bernstein MD ,&nbsp;Torpong Thongngarm MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing regimens are the mainstay for treating asthma despite usually being ineffective in noneosinophilic asthma (NEA). Data on the prevalence of NEA versus eosinophilic asthma (EA) in mild-to-moderate asthma are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We performed a systematic review of the prevalence of mild-to-moderate asthma in adolescents and adults using sputum inflammatory cell analysis and their responses to ICS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane) for studies in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. The primary outcome was the prevalence of asthma subtypes based on sputum inflammatory cell analysis, categorized into EA and NEA. The secondary outcome involved comparing asthma outcomes between different subtypes after ICS therapy. Certainty of evidence was reported for each pooled analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen studies involving 3,533 adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were reviewed. The pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) of NEA was estimated at 40.39% (27.54, 53.93) in patients with ICS naive with very low certainty of evidence. On reevaluating sputum cytology, the disease of approximately 20% to 30% of patients initially diagnosed as NEA transitioned to the EA subtype. EA patients showed significant improvements in asthma symptoms after ICS therapy: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (standardized mean difference, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.30, 1.27), and airway hyperresponsiveness (standardized mean difference, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.29, 2.40). NEA patients exhibited limited response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A high proportion of adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were identified with NEA subtype disease, which exhibited a poor response to ICS. A thorough diagnostic evaluation before initiating treatment should be integrated into clinical practice.</div><div>Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023484334)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subtype prevalence and treatment implication in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: Systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Chamard Wongsa MD ,&nbsp;Pakpoom Wongyikul MD ,&nbsp;Piyaporn Chokevittaya MD ,&nbsp;Anapat Nititammaluk MD ,&nbsp;Kay Khine Soe MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Phichayut Phinyo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Bernstein MD ,&nbsp;Torpong Thongngarm MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing regimens are the mainstay for treating asthma despite usually being ineffective in noneosinophilic asthma (NEA). Data on the prevalence of NEA versus eosinophilic asthma (EA) in mild-to-moderate asthma are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We performed a systematic review of the prevalence of mild-to-moderate asthma in adolescents and adults using sputum inflammatory cell analysis and their responses to ICS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane) for studies in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. The primary outcome was the prevalence of asthma subtypes based on sputum inflammatory cell analysis, categorized into EA and NEA. The secondary outcome involved comparing asthma outcomes between different subtypes after ICS therapy. Certainty of evidence was reported for each pooled analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen studies involving 3,533 adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were reviewed. The pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) of NEA was estimated at 40.39% (27.54, 53.93) in patients with ICS naive with very low certainty of evidence. On reevaluating sputum cytology, the disease of approximately 20% to 30% of patients initially diagnosed as NEA transitioned to the EA subtype. EA patients showed significant improvements in asthma symptoms after ICS therapy: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (standardized mean difference, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.30, 1.27), and airway hyperresponsiveness (standardized mean difference, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.29, 2.40). NEA patients exhibited limited response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A high proportion of adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were identified with NEA subtype disease, which exhibited a poor response to ICS. A thorough diagnostic evaluation before initiating treatment should be integrated into clinical practice.</div><div>Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023484334)</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景含吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)的治疗方案是治疗哮喘的主要方法,但通常对非嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘(NEA)无效。有关轻度至中度哮喘中 NEA 与嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘(EA)患病率的数据十分有限。方法我们检索了电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Cochrane)中有关轻度至中度哮喘青少年和成人的研究。主要研究结果是根据痰液炎症细胞分析得出的哮喘亚型发生率,分为 EA 和 NEA 两类。次要结果是比较不同亚型在接受 ICS 治疗后的哮喘疗效。结果 对涉及 3,533 名轻度至中度哮喘青少年和成人的 18 项研究进行了回顾。在接受 ICS 治疗的患者中,NEA 的汇总患病率(95% 置信区间)估计为 40.39% (27.54, 53.93),证据确定性极低。在对痰细胞学进行重新评估时,最初被诊断为 NEA 的患者中约有 20% 至 30% 的疾病转变为 EA 亚型。接受 ICS 治疗后,EA 患者的哮喘症状有明显改善:1 秒用力呼气量(标准化平均差异,0.79;95% 置信区间,0.30,1.27)和气道高反应性(标准化平均差异,1.34;95% 置信区间,0.29,2.40)。结论 患有轻度至中度哮喘的青少年和成人中,有很大一部分被确认为 NEA 亚型疾病,他们对 ICS 的反应较差。在 PROSPERO 注册 (CRD42023484334)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subtype prevalence and treatment implication in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing regimens are the mainstay for treating asthma despite usually being ineffective in noneosinophilic asthma (NEA). Data on the prevalence of NEA versus eosinophilic asthma (EA) in mild-to-moderate asthma are limited.

Objective

We performed a systematic review of the prevalence of mild-to-moderate asthma in adolescents and adults using sputum inflammatory cell analysis and their responses to ICS.

Methods

We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane) for studies in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. The primary outcome was the prevalence of asthma subtypes based on sputum inflammatory cell analysis, categorized into EA and NEA. The secondary outcome involved comparing asthma outcomes between different subtypes after ICS therapy. Certainty of evidence was reported for each pooled analysis.

Results

Eighteen studies involving 3,533 adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were reviewed. The pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) of NEA was estimated at 40.39% (27.54, 53.93) in patients with ICS naive with very low certainty of evidence. On reevaluating sputum cytology, the disease of approximately 20% to 30% of patients initially diagnosed as NEA transitioned to the EA subtype. EA patients showed significant improvements in asthma symptoms after ICS therapy: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (standardized mean difference, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.30, 1.27), and airway hyperresponsiveness (standardized mean difference, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.29, 2.40). NEA patients exhibited limited response.

Conclusion

A high proportion of adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were identified with NEA subtype disease, which exhibited a poor response to ICS. A thorough diagnostic evaluation before initiating treatment should be integrated into clinical practice.
Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023484334)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
期刊最新文献
Reply Editorial board A different lens to explore health literacy skills in atopic conditions Anti–IL-4Ra therapy is superior to other biologic classes in treating allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis Investigating health care pathways for anaphylaxis: Seeing the bigger picture through linked data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1