加拿大阿尔伯塔省落基山脉北部古老林分中的山松甲虫干扰后,残留林分几乎没有恢复。

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122408
Sarita Bassil, Robert E. Froese, Bradley D. Pinno
{"title":"加拿大阿尔伯塔省落基山脉北部古老林分中的山松甲虫干扰后,残留林分几乎没有恢复。","authors":"Sarita Bassil,&nbsp;Robert E. Froese,&nbsp;Bradley D. Pinno","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In early 2000s, long-distance wind dispersal of mountain pine beetle (MPB; <em>Dendroctonus ponderosae</em> Hopkins) resulted in massive outbreaks in the northern Rocky Mountains, Alberta, Canada, outside of the beetle’s natural range. We analyzed data from permanent plots measured for up to 15 years after MPB outbreaks in fire-origin, mature lodgepole pine (<em>Pinus contorta</em> var. <em>latifolia</em> Engelm.)-dominated stands scattered over an area of ∼ 75,000 km<sup>2</sup>. We evaluated stand level stocking, regeneration, and ingrowth of three species groups (pine, shade-tolerant conifers, and broadleaves) in stands where &gt; 50 % of pine basal area was killed. Using multiple linear regression analysis, we examined the relationship between stand and climatic covariates and basal area growth, density of regeneration, and ingrowth into the sapling size class at 9–15 years post-outbreak. Results showed that total live basal area for all species combined in trees with height ≥ 1.3 m occupies on average &lt; 50 % of the pre-MPB levels and is unchanged between both post-MPB measurements at 19.5 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup>. Ongoing pine mortality led to negative net growth, which exceeded the positive net growth in other conifers and resulted in zero net change for the whole stand. Post-MPB ingrowth and regeneration rates were close to zero for pine but increased slightly in other conifers and broadleaf species. Regression analysis revealed a negative relation between post-MPB growth and quadratic mean diameter of the reconstructed pre-MPB total basal area, while initial basal area and composition post-MPB varied among species. Our findings support the hypothesis that, post-MPB, mature pine dominated stands stagnate due to ongoing pine mortality, the maturity of remnant overstory, and a lack of adequate understory and regeneration that can accumulate sufficient growth at short-to mid-term post-outbreak. Our conclusions contrast other research, suggesting that outbreaks leave degraded residual stands with declining pine overstory and that transition to vigorous productive mixed stands is impossible in the absence of stand-replacing disturbance or silvicultural investment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"576 ","pages":"Article 122408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Little recovery of the residual stand after mountain pine beetle disturbance in old stands in the northern Rocky Mountains, Alberta, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Sarita Bassil,&nbsp;Robert E. Froese,&nbsp;Bradley D. Pinno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In early 2000s, long-distance wind dispersal of mountain pine beetle (MPB; <em>Dendroctonus ponderosae</em> Hopkins) resulted in massive outbreaks in the northern Rocky Mountains, Alberta, Canada, outside of the beetle’s natural range. We analyzed data from permanent plots measured for up to 15 years after MPB outbreaks in fire-origin, mature lodgepole pine (<em>Pinus contorta</em> var. <em>latifolia</em> Engelm.)-dominated stands scattered over an area of ∼ 75,000 km<sup>2</sup>. We evaluated stand level stocking, regeneration, and ingrowth of three species groups (pine, shade-tolerant conifers, and broadleaves) in stands where &gt; 50 % of pine basal area was killed. Using multiple linear regression analysis, we examined the relationship between stand and climatic covariates and basal area growth, density of regeneration, and ingrowth into the sapling size class at 9–15 years post-outbreak. Results showed that total live basal area for all species combined in trees with height ≥ 1.3 m occupies on average &lt; 50 % of the pre-MPB levels and is unchanged between both post-MPB measurements at 19.5 m<sup>2</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup>. Ongoing pine mortality led to negative net growth, which exceeded the positive net growth in other conifers and resulted in zero net change for the whole stand. Post-MPB ingrowth and regeneration rates were close to zero for pine but increased slightly in other conifers and broadleaf species. Regression analysis revealed a negative relation between post-MPB growth and quadratic mean diameter of the reconstructed pre-MPB total basal area, while initial basal area and composition post-MPB varied among species. Our findings support the hypothesis that, post-MPB, mature pine dominated stands stagnate due to ongoing pine mortality, the maturity of remnant overstory, and a lack of adequate understory and regeneration that can accumulate sufficient growth at short-to mid-term post-outbreak. Our conclusions contrast other research, suggesting that outbreaks leave degraded residual stands with declining pine overstory and that transition to vigorous productive mixed stands is impossible in the absence of stand-replacing disturbance or silvicultural investment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"576 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724007205\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724007205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本世纪初,山松甲虫(MPB;Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins)的长距离风传播导致该甲虫在加拿大阿尔伯塔省落基山脉北部的自然分布区外大规模爆发。我们分析了 MPB 爆发后长达 15 年的永久性地块测量数据,这些地块位于以火为起源、成熟的落羽松(Pinus contorta var.我们评估了松树基部面积被砍伐 50% 的林分中三个物种群(松树、耐阴针叶树和阔叶树)的林分水平蓄积量、再生和生长情况。通过多元线性回归分析,我们研究了林分和气候协变量与基部面积增长、再生密度以及爆发后 9-15 年树苗大小等级的生长之间的关系。结果表明,树高≥ 1.3 米的所有树种的总活基部面积平均占萌芽前水平的 50%,在萌芽后的两次测量中均保持不变,为 19.5 平方米/公顷。松树的持续死亡导致了负净增长,超过了其他针叶树的正净增长,导致整个林分的净变化为零。松树的后生长和再生率接近于零,但其他针叶树和阔叶树种的后生长和再生率略有增加。回归分析表明,萌芽后的生长与重建的萌芽前总基部面积的二次平均直径呈负相关,而萌芽后的初始基部面积和组成则因树种而异。我们的研究结果支持这样一种假设,即在主要濒危物种灭绝后,以成熟松树为主的林分由于松树持续死亡、残余上层林木成熟以及缺乏足够的林下植物和再生林木而停滞不前,无法在物种灭绝后的中短期内积累足够的生长量。我们的结论与其他研究形成了鲜明对比,其他研究表明,疫情爆发后,残留林分退化,松树上层衰退,在没有林分替代干扰或造林投资的情况下,不可能过渡到生长旺盛的高产混合林分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Little recovery of the residual stand after mountain pine beetle disturbance in old stands in the northern Rocky Mountains, Alberta, Canada.
In early 2000s, long-distance wind dispersal of mountain pine beetle (MPB; Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) resulted in massive outbreaks in the northern Rocky Mountains, Alberta, Canada, outside of the beetle’s natural range. We analyzed data from permanent plots measured for up to 15 years after MPB outbreaks in fire-origin, mature lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm.)-dominated stands scattered over an area of ∼ 75,000 km2. We evaluated stand level stocking, regeneration, and ingrowth of three species groups (pine, shade-tolerant conifers, and broadleaves) in stands where > 50 % of pine basal area was killed. Using multiple linear regression analysis, we examined the relationship between stand and climatic covariates and basal area growth, density of regeneration, and ingrowth into the sapling size class at 9–15 years post-outbreak. Results showed that total live basal area for all species combined in trees with height ≥ 1.3 m occupies on average < 50 % of the pre-MPB levels and is unchanged between both post-MPB measurements at 19.5 m2 ha−1. Ongoing pine mortality led to negative net growth, which exceeded the positive net growth in other conifers and resulted in zero net change for the whole stand. Post-MPB ingrowth and regeneration rates were close to zero for pine but increased slightly in other conifers and broadleaf species. Regression analysis revealed a negative relation between post-MPB growth and quadratic mean diameter of the reconstructed pre-MPB total basal area, while initial basal area and composition post-MPB varied among species. Our findings support the hypothesis that, post-MPB, mature pine dominated stands stagnate due to ongoing pine mortality, the maturity of remnant overstory, and a lack of adequate understory and regeneration that can accumulate sufficient growth at short-to mid-term post-outbreak. Our conclusions contrast other research, suggesting that outbreaks leave degraded residual stands with declining pine overstory and that transition to vigorous productive mixed stands is impossible in the absence of stand-replacing disturbance or silvicultural investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Long-term impacts of nurse plants on evergreen and deciduous oak saplings in Northern California Rational eucalypt logging site management patterns enhance soil phosphorus bioavailability and reshape phoD-harboring bacterial community structure Contrasting responses of bats and macro-moths to structural complexity in forest borders Multi-scale forest heterogeneity promotes occupancy of dusky-footed woodrats in the Sierra Nevada Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1