绩效费结构下变额年金的最优投资-提取策略

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jedc.2024.105003
Runhuan Feng , Xiaochen Jing , Kenneth Tsz Hin Ng
{"title":"绩效费结构下变额年金的最优投资-提取策略","authors":"Runhuan Feng ,&nbsp;Xiaochen Jing ,&nbsp;Kenneth Tsz Hin Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.jedc.2024.105003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Variable Annuities (VAs) provide policyholders with market participation while offering additional protection from insurers. In this article, we develop a mathematical model to explore the impact of different fee structures on VAs with a ratchet feature and derive analytical solutions to the associated optimal investment-withdrawal problem. We focus on a performance fee structure, highlighting its advantages over the traditional constant fee structure from both the insurer's and policyholder's perspectives. Our findings show that policyholders adopt more conservative investment strategies under the performance fee, leading to increased expected profits and reduced tail risks for risk-neutral insurers. From a mathematical standpoint, we contribute by proving the well-posedness of the associated free-boundary value problems (FBPs) and establishing verification theorems for the underlying control problems. These results involve non-standard analysis and estimations due to the ratchet feature and the guaranteed protections embedded in the contract.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 105003"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal investment-withdrawal strategy for variable annuities under a performance fee structure\",\"authors\":\"Runhuan Feng ,&nbsp;Xiaochen Jing ,&nbsp;Kenneth Tsz Hin Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jedc.2024.105003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Variable Annuities (VAs) provide policyholders with market participation while offering additional protection from insurers. In this article, we develop a mathematical model to explore the impact of different fee structures on VAs with a ratchet feature and derive analytical solutions to the associated optimal investment-withdrawal problem. We focus on a performance fee structure, highlighting its advantages over the traditional constant fee structure from both the insurer's and policyholder's perspectives. Our findings show that policyholders adopt more conservative investment strategies under the performance fee, leading to increased expected profits and reduced tail risks for risk-neutral insurers. From a mathematical standpoint, we contribute by proving the well-posedness of the associated free-boundary value problems (FBPs) and establishing verification theorems for the underlying control problems. These results involve non-standard analysis and estimations due to the ratchet feature and the guaranteed protections embedded in the contract.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188924001957\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188924001957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

变额年金(Variable Annuities,VA)在为投保人提供市场参与的同时,也为其提供了来自保险公司的额外保障。在本文中,我们建立了一个数学模型来探讨不同费用结构对具有棘轮特征的变额年金的影响,并推导出相关最优投资-提取问题的分析解决方案。我们重点研究了绩效费用结构,从保险公司和投保人的角度强调了其相对于传统恒定费用结构的优势。我们的研究结果表明,投保人在业绩费用下会采取更保守的投资策略,从而增加预期利润,降低风险中性的保险公司的尾部风险。从数学角度来看,我们证明了相关自由边界值问题(FBPs)的良好可求性,并建立了相关控制问题的验证定理。这些结果涉及非标准分析和估算,原因是合同中嵌入了棘轮特征和保证保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal investment-withdrawal strategy for variable annuities under a performance fee structure
Variable Annuities (VAs) provide policyholders with market participation while offering additional protection from insurers. In this article, we develop a mathematical model to explore the impact of different fee structures on VAs with a ratchet feature and derive analytical solutions to the associated optimal investment-withdrawal problem. We focus on a performance fee structure, highlighting its advantages over the traditional constant fee structure from both the insurer's and policyholder's perspectives. Our findings show that policyholders adopt more conservative investment strategies under the performance fee, leading to increased expected profits and reduced tail risks for risk-neutral insurers. From a mathematical standpoint, we contribute by proving the well-posedness of the associated free-boundary value problems (FBPs) and establishing verification theorems for the underlying control problems. These results involve non-standard analysis and estimations due to the ratchet feature and the guaranteed protections embedded in the contract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: The journal provides an outlet for publication of research concerning all theoretical and empirical aspects of economic dynamics and control as well as the development and use of computational methods in economics and finance. Contributions regarding computational methods may include, but are not restricted to, artificial intelligence, databases, decision support systems, genetic algorithms, modelling languages, neural networks, numerical algorithms for optimization, control and equilibria, parallel computing and qualitative reasoning.
期刊最新文献
Judgment can spur long memory Pricing asset beyond financial fundamentals: The impact of prosocial preference and image concerns The nexus of overnight trend and asset prices in China Optimal investment-withdrawal strategy for variable annuities under a performance fee structure The hockey stick Phillips curve and the effective lower bound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1