适当的正交分解是否适用于验证湍流尾流的模拟?

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105953
Tomáš Hlavatý , Martin Isoz , Marek Belda , Václav Uruba , Pavel Procházka
{"title":"适当的正交分解是否适用于验证湍流尾流的模拟?","authors":"Tomáš Hlavatý ,&nbsp;Martin Isoz ,&nbsp;Marek Belda ,&nbsp;Václav Uruba ,&nbsp;Pavel Procházka","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To evaluate the suitability of the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for validating a simulated flow dynamics, we selected the flow in the wake behind a circular cylinder at Reynolds number of <span><math><mrow><mo>≈</mo><mn>5000</mn></mrow></math></span> as a well studied canonical problem. The flow was simulated via <span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span>-<span><math><mi>ω</mi></math></span> <sub>SST</sub> detached-eddy simulation (DES) and, on selected planes of measurement (PoM), investigated experimentally by a time-resolved variant of the particle image velocimetry (PIV) and stereo-PIV methods. A standard model validation comprising, among other, comparison of the drag coefficient, or separation angle, and of the averaged flow properties and turbulence spectra, was carried out. Subsequently, both the PIV and the numerical data on the selected planes in the geometry were analyzed by POD, and a fully 3D POD analysis of the numerical data was used to evaluate the credibility of the planar POD as a tool for dynamic model validation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 105953"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the proper orthogonal decomposition suitable to validate simulation of turbulent wake?\",\"authors\":\"Tomáš Hlavatý ,&nbsp;Martin Isoz ,&nbsp;Marek Belda ,&nbsp;Václav Uruba ,&nbsp;Pavel Procházka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To evaluate the suitability of the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for validating a simulated flow dynamics, we selected the flow in the wake behind a circular cylinder at Reynolds number of <span><math><mrow><mo>≈</mo><mn>5000</mn></mrow></math></span> as a well studied canonical problem. The flow was simulated via <span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span>-<span><math><mi>ω</mi></math></span> <sub>SST</sub> detached-eddy simulation (DES) and, on selected planes of measurement (PoM), investigated experimentally by a time-resolved variant of the particle image velocimetry (PIV) and stereo-PIV methods. A standard model validation comprising, among other, comparison of the drag coefficient, or separation angle, and of the averaged flow properties and turbulence spectra, was carried out. Subsequently, both the PIV and the numerical data on the selected planes in the geometry were analyzed by POD, and a fully 3D POD analysis of the numerical data was used to evaluate the credibility of the planar POD as a tool for dynamic model validation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"volume\":\"255 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524003167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524003167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估适当正交分解(POD)是否适用于验证模拟流动动力学,我们选择了雷诺数为 ≈5000 的圆柱体后的尾流作为一个经过深入研究的典型问题。通过 k-ω SST 离散涡流模拟(DES)对流动进行了模拟,并在选定的测量平面(PoM)上通过粒子图像测速(PIV)和立体 PIV 方法的时间分辨变体进行了实验研究。标准模型验证包括阻力系数或分离角的比较,以及平均流动特性和湍流频谱的比较。随后,对几何图形中选定平面上的 PIV 和数值数据进行了 POD 分析,并对数值数据进行了全 3D POD 分析,以评估平面 POD 作为动态模型验证工具的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the proper orthogonal decomposition suitable to validate simulation of turbulent wake?
To evaluate the suitability of the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for validating a simulated flow dynamics, we selected the flow in the wake behind a circular cylinder at Reynolds number of 5000 as a well studied canonical problem. The flow was simulated via k-ω SST detached-eddy simulation (DES) and, on selected planes of measurement (PoM), investigated experimentally by a time-resolved variant of the particle image velocimetry (PIV) and stereo-PIV methods. A standard model validation comprising, among other, comparison of the drag coefficient, or separation angle, and of the averaged flow properties and turbulence spectra, was carried out. Subsequently, both the PIV and the numerical data on the selected planes in the geometry were analyzed by POD, and a fully 3D POD analysis of the numerical data was used to evaluate the credibility of the planar POD as a tool for dynamic model validation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
期刊最新文献
Turbulence and flapping pivot axis effects on torsional flutter harvester efficiency by closed-form formula Interpolating wind pressure time-histories around a tall building - A deep learning-based approach Wind loads on flat plates and porous screens installed on the track surface during the passage of high-speed trains Experimental study on wind-induced vibration and aerodynamic interference effects of flexible photovoltaics Calibration of pressures measured via tubing systems: Accounting for laboratory environmental variations between tubing response measurement and wind tunnel testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1