贸易不确定性、排放上限和企业污染

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106814
Haichao Fan , Guangyuan Guo , Yu Liu , Huanhuan Wang
{"title":"贸易不确定性、排放上限和企业污染","authors":"Haichao Fan ,&nbsp;Guangyuan Guo ,&nbsp;Yu Liu ,&nbsp;Huanhuan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the effects of reducing trade policy uncertainty (TPU) on firms’ production and pollution dynamics under different extents of environmental regulation stringency. We develop a trade model with heterogeneous firms subject to different regulatory pressures. Our calibration shows that reduced TPU boosts firm output by 6%, which persists even under stricter environmental regulations. Meanwhile, the emission cap control prominently reduces emissions and emission intensity. By constructing a firm-level TPU reduction shock following the U.S. granting of permanent normal trade relations to China, we empirically test our model’s predictions using Chinese data. Consistently, we find that while firms in both environmentally regulated and non-regulated zones increase output to similar extents, only those in Two-Control Zones with stringent sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission controls reduce their total emission intensity through decreased fossil fuel use, desulfurization, and increased investment in pollution abatement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 106814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade uncertainty, emission cap and firm pollution\",\"authors\":\"Haichao Fan ,&nbsp;Guangyuan Guo ,&nbsp;Yu Liu ,&nbsp;Huanhuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the effects of reducing trade policy uncertainty (TPU) on firms’ production and pollution dynamics under different extents of environmental regulation stringency. We develop a trade model with heterogeneous firms subject to different regulatory pressures. Our calibration shows that reduced TPU boosts firm output by 6%, which persists even under stricter environmental regulations. Meanwhile, the emission cap control prominently reduces emissions and emission intensity. By constructing a firm-level TPU reduction shock following the U.S. granting of permanent normal trade relations to China, we empirically test our model’s predictions using Chinese data. Consistently, we find that while firms in both environmentally regulated and non-regulated zones increase output to similar extents, only those in Two-Control Zones with stringent sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission controls reduce their total emission intensity through decreased fossil fuel use, desulfurization, and increased investment in pollution abatement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124004281\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124004281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在不同的环境监管严格程度下,减少贸易政策不确定性(TPU)对企业生产和污染动态的影响。我们建立了一个贸易模型,其中的异质企业受到不同的监管压力。我们的校准结果表明,TPU 的降低会使企业产出提高 6%,即使在更严格的环境法规下,这种影响也会持续存在。同时,排放上限控制显著降低了排放量和排放强度。通过构建美国给予中国永久正常贸易关系后企业层面的 TPU 减少冲击,我们利用中国数据对模型的预测进行了实证检验。我们一致发现,虽然环境管制区和非管制区的企业在类似程度上都增加了产出,但只有那些实行严格二氧化硫(SO2)排放管制的两管制区的企业才会通过减少化石燃料使用、脱硫和增加污染治理投资来降低总排放强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trade uncertainty, emission cap and firm pollution
This study investigates the effects of reducing trade policy uncertainty (TPU) on firms’ production and pollution dynamics under different extents of environmental regulation stringency. We develop a trade model with heterogeneous firms subject to different regulatory pressures. Our calibration shows that reduced TPU boosts firm output by 6%, which persists even under stricter environmental regulations. Meanwhile, the emission cap control prominently reduces emissions and emission intensity. By constructing a firm-level TPU reduction shock following the U.S. granting of permanent normal trade relations to China, we empirically test our model’s predictions using Chinese data. Consistently, we find that while firms in both environmentally regulated and non-regulated zones increase output to similar extents, only those in Two-Control Zones with stringent sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission controls reduce their total emission intensity through decreased fossil fuel use, desulfurization, and increased investment in pollution abatement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Inequality, social mobility and redistributive preferences From shocks to solidarity and superstition: Exploring the foundations of faith Religion as an informal institution: A case of true pure land Buddhism and missing women in early modern Japan Synchronization of endogenous business cycles Multitasking and leadership in optimal incentive contracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1