青少年福利服务中的人员处理:横断面方法

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Children and Youth Services Review Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108027
Sanna Aaltonen , Oona Lipponen , Noora Hästbacka , Sakari Karvonen
{"title":"青少年福利服务中的人员处理:横断面方法","authors":"Sanna Aaltonen ,&nbsp;Oona Lipponen ,&nbsp;Noora Hästbacka ,&nbsp;Sakari Karvonen","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper holistically sheds light on youth welfare services, drawing upon interviews with professionals working in youth, health, social and employment services and investigating their institutionally embedded professional practices and shared features. The 38 individual and group interviews with 73 professionals were analysed thematically to determine their priorities in their work and identify what is done with young people seeking help from their services. First, the services were identified as having four functions: (1) guidance, (2) authoritative decision-making, (3) psychosocial support and (4) everyday support. These functions are prioritised differently in the services, but the services are not limited to a single service feature. This typology demonstrates that young people often need more than one form of support for diverse aspects of their lives. Second, the interviews highlighted the working method of people-processing, understood as categorising, assessing and guiding clients to other services. While earlier research has understood people-processing as a feature of specific services or organisations, it is a central method in all services. The service system’s high client volumes and requirements for efficiency make it ill-suited to long-term, relationship-based work, and there is an incentive to keep young people moving on a service pathway and process them forward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 108027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"People-processing in youth welfare services: A cross-sectional approach\",\"authors\":\"Sanna Aaltonen ,&nbsp;Oona Lipponen ,&nbsp;Noora Hästbacka ,&nbsp;Sakari Karvonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper holistically sheds light on youth welfare services, drawing upon interviews with professionals working in youth, health, social and employment services and investigating their institutionally embedded professional practices and shared features. The 38 individual and group interviews with 73 professionals were analysed thematically to determine their priorities in their work and identify what is done with young people seeking help from their services. First, the services were identified as having four functions: (1) guidance, (2) authoritative decision-making, (3) psychosocial support and (4) everyday support. These functions are prioritised differently in the services, but the services are not limited to a single service feature. This typology demonstrates that young people often need more than one form of support for diverse aspects of their lives. Second, the interviews highlighted the working method of people-processing, understood as categorising, assessing and guiding clients to other services. While earlier research has understood people-processing as a feature of specific services or organisations, it is a central method in all services. The service system’s high client volumes and requirements for efficiency make it ill-suited to long-term, relationship-based work, and there is an incentive to keep young people moving on a service pathway and process them forward.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924005991\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924005991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对在青年、卫生、社会和就业服务机构工作的专业人员的访谈,对他们在机构内的专业实践和共同特点进行了调查,从整体上揭示了青年福利服务的情况。对 73 名专业人员进行的 38 次个人和小组访谈进行了专题分析,以确定他们在工作中的优先事项,并查明他们为寻求其服务的青少年做了哪些工作。首先,确定了服务的四种功能:(1) 指导,(2) 权威决策,(3) 社会心理支持和 (4) 日常支持。这些功能在服务中的优先次序各不相同,但服务并不局限于单一的服务功能。这种类型学表明,青少年在生活的不同方面往往需要不止一种形式的支持。其次,访谈强调了 "人员处理 "的工作方法,即对服务对象进行分类、评估并引导他们接受其他服务。虽然早期的研究将人员处理理解为特定服务或组织的一个特征,但它是所有服务的核心方法。服务系统的客户量大,对效率的要求高,因此不适合开展长期的、以关系为基础的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
People-processing in youth welfare services: A cross-sectional approach
This paper holistically sheds light on youth welfare services, drawing upon interviews with professionals working in youth, health, social and employment services and investigating their institutionally embedded professional practices and shared features. The 38 individual and group interviews with 73 professionals were analysed thematically to determine their priorities in their work and identify what is done with young people seeking help from their services. First, the services were identified as having four functions: (1) guidance, (2) authoritative decision-making, (3) psychosocial support and (4) everyday support. These functions are prioritised differently in the services, but the services are not limited to a single service feature. This typology demonstrates that young people often need more than one form of support for diverse aspects of their lives. Second, the interviews highlighted the working method of people-processing, understood as categorising, assessing and guiding clients to other services. While earlier research has understood people-processing as a feature of specific services or organisations, it is a central method in all services. The service system’s high client volumes and requirements for efficiency make it ill-suited to long-term, relationship-based work, and there is an incentive to keep young people moving on a service pathway and process them forward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Expanding the child care table of influence: Reaching under-resourced families to understand their needs and barriers to accessing early childhood care and education Consequences of cyber dating abuse on adolescent victims: Systematic review Parental practices as mediators of the effect of a family-based program on the prevention of substance use among Brazilian adolescentes Positive cascades effect in care leavers resilience processes: the association of self-compassion, SRH, self-efficacy and readiness for independent living
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1