Rogério Willian Silva dos Santos , Lucas Cantão Freitas , Marcos Lúcio Corazza , Roberta Claro da Silva , Marcos Rogério Mafra , Tirzhá Lins Porto Dantas
{"title":"亚马逊油的超萃取：优化以及与索氏提取和压缩丙烷提取的比较","authors":"Rogério Willian Silva dos Santos , Lucas Cantão Freitas , Marcos Lúcio Corazza , Roberta Claro da Silva , Marcos Rogério Mafra , Tirzhá Lins Porto Dantas","doi":"10.1016/j.cep.2024.110081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Amazon region, while rich in biodiversity, experiences low socio-economic development. One promising solution involves using Amazon oilseeds, which offer high nutritional value and industrial potential. However, traditional extraction methods have limitations, such as high energy use, solvent consumption, and low yields. This study optimized the extraction of Brazil nut oil (BNO) and Tucumã-do-Amazonas oil (TAO) using Ultra turrax-assisted extraction (UTAE), comparing it with conventional and non-conventional methods. Using the Plackett-Burman design, only extraction time and solvent/solid ratio were significant factors. Optimizing these variables through response surface methodology achieved high yields: 64.6% for BNO and 61.1% for TAO, outperforming Soxhlet and compressed propane extraction (CPE) by up to 43.4%. UTAE produced comparable oleic acid levels in BNO (37.0 - 37.8%) and TAO (66.1 - 68.2%). Additionally, the total phenolic content was higher in both CPE (7.87 ± 0.77 and 26.71 ± 0.63 mg GAE.100 <em>g</em><sup>−1</sup>) and UTAE (4.57 ± 1.00 and 19.63 ± 1.68 mg GAE.100 <em>g</em><sup>−1</sup>) compared to Soxhlet (1.25 ± 0.37 and 10.97 ± 1.92 mg GAE.100 <em>g</em><sup>−1</sup>) for BNO and TAO, respectively. These results highlight UTAE's efficiency for oil extraction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9929,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 110081"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultra turrax-assisted extraction of Amazon oils: Optimization and comparison with Soxhlet and compressed propane extraction\",\"authors\":\"Rogério Willian Silva dos Santos , Lucas Cantão Freitas , Marcos Lúcio Corazza , Roberta Claro da Silva , Marcos Rogério Mafra , Tirzhá Lins Porto Dantas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cep.2024.110081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Amazon region, while rich in biodiversity, experiences low socio-economic development. One promising solution involves using Amazon oilseeds, which offer high nutritional value and industrial potential. However, traditional extraction methods have limitations, such as high energy use, solvent consumption, and low yields. This study optimized the extraction of Brazil nut oil (BNO) and Tucumã-do-Amazonas oil (TAO) using Ultra turrax-assisted extraction (UTAE), comparing it with conventional and non-conventional methods. Using the Plackett-Burman design, only extraction time and solvent/solid ratio were significant factors. Optimizing these variables through response surface methodology achieved high yields: 64.6% for BNO and 61.1% for TAO, outperforming Soxhlet and compressed propane extraction (CPE) by up to 43.4%. UTAE produced comparable oleic acid levels in BNO (37.0 - 37.8%) and TAO (66.1 - 68.2%). Additionally, the total phenolic content was higher in both CPE (7.87 ± 0.77 and 26.71 ± 0.63 mg GAE.100 <em>g</em><sup>−1</sup>) and UTAE (4.57 ± 1.00 and 19.63 ± 1.68 mg GAE.100 <em>g</em><sup>−1</sup>) compared to Soxhlet (1.25 ± 0.37 and 10.97 ± 1.92 mg GAE.100 <em>g</em><sup>−1</sup>) for BNO and TAO, respectively. These results highlight UTAE's efficiency for oil extraction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255270124004197\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255270124004197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultra turrax-assisted extraction of Amazon oils: Optimization and comparison with Soxhlet and compressed propane extraction
The Amazon region, while rich in biodiversity, experiences low socio-economic development. One promising solution involves using Amazon oilseeds, which offer high nutritional value and industrial potential. However, traditional extraction methods have limitations, such as high energy use, solvent consumption, and low yields. This study optimized the extraction of Brazil nut oil (BNO) and Tucumã-do-Amazonas oil (TAO) using Ultra turrax-assisted extraction (UTAE), comparing it with conventional and non-conventional methods. Using the Plackett-Burman design, only extraction time and solvent/solid ratio were significant factors. Optimizing these variables through response surface methodology achieved high yields: 64.6% for BNO and 61.1% for TAO, outperforming Soxhlet and compressed propane extraction (CPE) by up to 43.4%. UTAE produced comparable oleic acid levels in BNO (37.0 - 37.8%) and TAO (66.1 - 68.2%). Additionally, the total phenolic content was higher in both CPE (7.87 ± 0.77 and 26.71 ± 0.63 mg GAE.100 g−1) and UTAE (4.57 ± 1.00 and 19.63 ± 1.68 mg GAE.100 g−1) compared to Soxhlet (1.25 ± 0.37 and 10.97 ± 1.92 mg GAE.100 g−1) for BNO and TAO, respectively. These results highlight UTAE's efficiency for oil extraction.
期刊介绍：
Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification is intended for practicing researchers in industry and academia, working in the field of Process Engineering and related to the subject of Process Intensification.Articles published in the Journal demonstrate how novel discoveries, developments and theories in the field of Process Engineering and in particular Process Intensification may be used for analysis and design of innovative equipment and processing methods with substantially improved sustainability, efficiency and environmental performance.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
