在追求去碳化的同时增加能源需求的风险:欧盟航空部门使用电子燃料的案例

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.007
M. Prussi, M. Noussan, L. Laveneziana, D. Chiaramonti
{"title":"在追求去碳化的同时增加能源需求的风险:欧盟航空部门使用电子燃料的案例","authors":"M. Prussi,&nbsp;M. Noussan,&nbsp;L. Laveneziana,&nbsp;D. Chiaramonti","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The European Union target of a net-zero economy by mid-century requires an unprecedented effort in the reduction of carbon emissions. Aviation is among the most difficult sectors to decarbonize, and since direct electrification is unlikely to become a viable option in the short-term, other alternatives are considered, including biofuels and e-fuels. The blending mandates recently approved in the ReFuelEU Aviation package (35% of e-fuels at 2050) will require devoting an important amount of renewable electricity to produce e-fuels, increasing the relative weight of aviation with respect other sectors in terms of energy consumption. Aviation accounts today for 13% of the EU27 (2019) energy consumption for transport, while in 2050 this is expected to reach the 22%. This “magnifying effect” for the energy required by the sector, due to the low overall conversion efficiency of e-fuel production, will likely foster a competition for the access to renewable energy. This shift toward the aviation sector may occur to detriment of other applications potentially most effective in decreasing carbon emissions per unit of electricity. This apparent dichotomy between GHG reduction and energy efficiency could reduce the actual effectiveness of existing policies and the possibility of fostering similar initiatives in other countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"160 ","pages":"Pages 154-158"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The risk of increasing energy demand while pursuing decarbonisation: the case of the e-fuels for the EU aviation sector\",\"authors\":\"M. Prussi,&nbsp;M. Noussan,&nbsp;L. Laveneziana,&nbsp;D. Chiaramonti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The European Union target of a net-zero economy by mid-century requires an unprecedented effort in the reduction of carbon emissions. Aviation is among the most difficult sectors to decarbonize, and since direct electrification is unlikely to become a viable option in the short-term, other alternatives are considered, including biofuels and e-fuels. The blending mandates recently approved in the ReFuelEU Aviation package (35% of e-fuels at 2050) will require devoting an important amount of renewable electricity to produce e-fuels, increasing the relative weight of aviation with respect other sectors in terms of energy consumption. Aviation accounts today for 13% of the EU27 (2019) energy consumption for transport, while in 2050 this is expected to reach the 22%. This “magnifying effect” for the energy required by the sector, due to the low overall conversion efficiency of e-fuel production, will likely foster a competition for the access to renewable energy. This shift toward the aviation sector may occur to detriment of other applications potentially most effective in decreasing carbon emissions per unit of electricity. This apparent dichotomy between GHG reduction and energy efficiency could reduce the actual effectiveness of existing policies and the possibility of fostering similar initiatives in other countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 154-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2400338X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2400338X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟到本世纪中叶实现净零经济的目标要求在减少碳排放方面做出前所未有的努力。航空业是最难实现脱碳的行业之一,由于直接电气化在短期内不太可能成为可行的选择,因此需要考虑其他替代方案,包括生物燃料和电子燃料。欧盟航空燃料再利用一揽子计划(2050 年电子燃料占 35%)中最近批准的混合任务要求将大量可再生电力用于生产电子燃料,从而增加了航空与其他部门在能源消耗方面的相对比重。目前,航空占欧盟 27 国(2019 年)运输能源消耗的 13%,而 2050 年预计将达到 22%。由于电子燃料生产的整体转换效率较低,该行业所需能源的这种 "放大效应 "很可能会促进可再生能源的获取竞争。这种向航空部门的转移可能会损害其他在减少单位电力碳排放方面可能最有效的应用。减少温室气体排放与提高能源效率之间的这种明显对立可能会降低现有政策的实际效果,以及在其他国家促进类似倡议的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The risk of increasing energy demand while pursuing decarbonisation: the case of the e-fuels for the EU aviation sector
The European Union target of a net-zero economy by mid-century requires an unprecedented effort in the reduction of carbon emissions. Aviation is among the most difficult sectors to decarbonize, and since direct electrification is unlikely to become a viable option in the short-term, other alternatives are considered, including biofuels and e-fuels. The blending mandates recently approved in the ReFuelEU Aviation package (35% of e-fuels at 2050) will require devoting an important amount of renewable electricity to produce e-fuels, increasing the relative weight of aviation with respect other sectors in terms of energy consumption. Aviation accounts today for 13% of the EU27 (2019) energy consumption for transport, while in 2050 this is expected to reach the 22%. This “magnifying effect” for the energy required by the sector, due to the low overall conversion efficiency of e-fuel production, will likely foster a competition for the access to renewable energy. This shift toward the aviation sector may occur to detriment of other applications potentially most effective in decreasing carbon emissions per unit of electricity. This apparent dichotomy between GHG reduction and energy efficiency could reduce the actual effectiveness of existing policies and the possibility of fostering similar initiatives in other countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A model for speed and fuel refueling strategy of methanol dual-fuel liners with emission control areas Drivers of short-term essential air service operations: Load factor, pricing, and subsidy policies in China's domestic air market Charting sustainable vistas: Analysis of internal and external sustainability performance of Chinese ports Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1