{"title":"人工智能如何减少碳排放?使用广义随机森林进行准自然实验的启示","authors":"Lingbing Feng , Jiajun Qi , Yuhao Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of a recent regional artificial intelligence pilot zone (AIPZ) policy in China on firms' carbon performance using a quasi-natural experiment. Using the Difference-in-Differences (DID) methodology, the findings reveal that the AIPZ policy significantly reduces firms' carbon emissions. This effect is most pronounced for firms with high talent levels, positive media sentiment, and strong internal control, while heavily polluting firms experience a relatively minor effect. A variable importance analysis using the generalized random forest approach identifies return on assets (ROA) and Tobin's Q as significant contributors to the variation in firms' responses. Specifically, when ROA is negative, the treatment effect is relatively large and increases slowly. In contrast, when ROA is positive, the treatment effect decreases rapidly, showing a zero-boundary effect. Additionally, Tobin's Q exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with the treatment effect. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for policymakers in China and beyond, highlighting the importance of considering firm-specific characteristics to achieve effective and sustainable environmental management alongside economic development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108040"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can AI reduce carbon emissions? Insights from a quasi-natural experiment using generalized random forest\",\"authors\":\"Lingbing Feng , Jiajun Qi , Yuhao Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the impact of a recent regional artificial intelligence pilot zone (AIPZ) policy in China on firms' carbon performance using a quasi-natural experiment. Using the Difference-in-Differences (DID) methodology, the findings reveal that the AIPZ policy significantly reduces firms' carbon emissions. This effect is most pronounced for firms with high talent levels, positive media sentiment, and strong internal control, while heavily polluting firms experience a relatively minor effect. A variable importance analysis using the generalized random forest approach identifies return on assets (ROA) and Tobin's Q as significant contributors to the variation in firms' responses. Specifically, when ROA is negative, the treatment effect is relatively large and increases slowly. In contrast, when ROA is positive, the treatment effect decreases rapidly, showing a zero-boundary effect. Additionally, Tobin's Q exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with the treatment effect. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for policymakers in China and beyond, highlighting the importance of considering firm-specific characteristics to achieve effective and sustainable environmental management alongside economic development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324007497\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324007497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究采用准自然实验的方法,考察了中国近期出台的人工智能试验区(AIPZ)政策对企业碳绩效的影响。利用差分法(DID),研究结果表明,人工智能试验区政策显著降低了企业的碳排放量。这种效应对人才水平高、媒体情绪好、内部控制强的企业最为明显,而对重污染企业的影响相对较小。利用广义随机森林方法进行的变量重要性分析表明,资产收益率(ROA)和托宾 Q 值是导致企业反应差异的重要因素。具体而言,当投资回报率为负数时,治疗效果相对较大,且增长缓慢。相反,当投资回报率为正值时,治疗效果迅速下降,呈现出零边界效应。此外,托宾 Q 值与治疗效果呈倒 U 型关系。本研究的结论为中国和其他国家的政策制定者提供了宝贵的启示,强调了在经济发展的同时考虑企业具体特征以实现有效和可持续环境管理的重要性。
How can AI reduce carbon emissions? Insights from a quasi-natural experiment using generalized random forest
This study examines the impact of a recent regional artificial intelligence pilot zone (AIPZ) policy in China on firms' carbon performance using a quasi-natural experiment. Using the Difference-in-Differences (DID) methodology, the findings reveal that the AIPZ policy significantly reduces firms' carbon emissions. This effect is most pronounced for firms with high talent levels, positive media sentiment, and strong internal control, while heavily polluting firms experience a relatively minor effect. A variable importance analysis using the generalized random forest approach identifies return on assets (ROA) and Tobin's Q as significant contributors to the variation in firms' responses. Specifically, when ROA is negative, the treatment effect is relatively large and increases slowly. In contrast, when ROA is positive, the treatment effect decreases rapidly, showing a zero-boundary effect. Additionally, Tobin's Q exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with the treatment effect. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for policymakers in China and beyond, highlighting the importance of considering firm-specific characteristics to achieve effective and sustainable environmental management alongside economic development.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.