将 "重视每次接触 "纳入医学本科课程的有效性

Robyn Fletcher , Alexander Hammant , Rebecca Symes , Andrew Turvey , Andy Ward , Ary Mahdzir , Bharathy Kumaravel
{"title":"将 \"重视每次接触 \"纳入医学本科课程的有效性","authors":"Robyn Fletcher ,&nbsp;Alexander Hammant ,&nbsp;Rebecca Symes ,&nbsp;Andrew Turvey ,&nbsp;Andy Ward ,&nbsp;Ary Mahdzir ,&nbsp;Bharathy Kumaravel","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating Making Every Contact Count (MECC) using Healthy Conversation Skills (HCS) into an undergraduate medical curriculum and test the performance of an associated assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Concepts were introduced to second year students through lectures, small group seminars, role-plays and a new Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).</div><div>station. Students' feedback was gathered and their examination performance was analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>MECC/HCS was integrated into the undergraduate medical curriculum at Leicester Medical School. Teaching had a positive impact on the students' self-reported confidence in carrying out MECC (7/10 to 9/10, <em>p</em> &gt; 0.001) and in their self-reported likelihood of doing so (7/10 to 9/10, p &gt; 0.001). The MECC OSCE station was good at discriminating between students' abilities (group discrimination metric 4.36–4.44). The small negative alpha differences for the MECC/HCS station (−0.032 and − 0.028) indicated this station positively contributed to the overall reliability of the assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It was feasible to integrate MECC/HCS into an undergraduate medical curriculum, with a positive impact on students' confidence.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>In addition to teaching, this study describes the development and testing of OSCE stations to assess students' MECC skills in simulated clinical scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of integrating making every contact count into an undergraduate medical curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Robyn Fletcher ,&nbsp;Alexander Hammant ,&nbsp;Rebecca Symes ,&nbsp;Andrew Turvey ,&nbsp;Andy Ward ,&nbsp;Ary Mahdzir ,&nbsp;Bharathy Kumaravel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating Making Every Contact Count (MECC) using Healthy Conversation Skills (HCS) into an undergraduate medical curriculum and test the performance of an associated assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Concepts were introduced to second year students through lectures, small group seminars, role-plays and a new Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).</div><div>station. Students' feedback was gathered and their examination performance was analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>MECC/HCS was integrated into the undergraduate medical curriculum at Leicester Medical School. Teaching had a positive impact on the students' self-reported confidence in carrying out MECC (7/10 to 9/10, <em>p</em> &gt; 0.001) and in their self-reported likelihood of doing so (7/10 to 9/10, p &gt; 0.001). The MECC OSCE station was good at discriminating between students' abilities (group discrimination metric 4.36–4.44). The small negative alpha differences for the MECC/HCS station (−0.032 and − 0.028) indicated this station positively contributed to the overall reliability of the assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It was feasible to integrate MECC/HCS into an undergraduate medical curriculum, with a positive impact on students' confidence.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>In addition to teaching, this study describes the development and testing of OSCE stations to assess students' MECC skills in simulated clinical scenarios.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224001043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224001043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法通过讲座、小组研讨会、角色扮演和新的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)向二年级学生介绍相关概念。收集了学生的反馈意见,并对他们的考试成绩进行了分析。教学对学生自我报告的进行 MECC 的信心(7/10 到 9/10,p >;0.001)和自我报告的进行 MECC 的可能性(7/10 到 9/10,p >;0.001)产生了积极影响。MECC OSCE 考试站在区分学生能力方面表现出色(小组区分度指标为 4.36-4.44)。结论将 MECC/HCS 纳入医学本科课程是可行的,并对学生的自信心产生了积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of integrating making every contact count into an undergraduate medical curriculum

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating Making Every Contact Count (MECC) using Healthy Conversation Skills (HCS) into an undergraduate medical curriculum and test the performance of an associated assessment.

Methods

Concepts were introduced to second year students through lectures, small group seminars, role-plays and a new Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
station. Students' feedback was gathered and their examination performance was analysed.

Results

MECC/HCS was integrated into the undergraduate medical curriculum at Leicester Medical School. Teaching had a positive impact on the students' self-reported confidence in carrying out MECC (7/10 to 9/10, p > 0.001) and in their self-reported likelihood of doing so (7/10 to 9/10, p > 0.001). The MECC OSCE station was good at discriminating between students' abilities (group discrimination metric 4.36–4.44). The small negative alpha differences for the MECC/HCS station (−0.032 and − 0.028) indicated this station positively contributed to the overall reliability of the assessment.

Conclusion

It was feasible to integrate MECC/HCS into an undergraduate medical curriculum, with a positive impact on students' confidence.

Innovation

In addition to teaching, this study describes the development and testing of OSCE stations to assess students' MECC skills in simulated clinical scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
期刊最新文献
Measuring professionals' attitudes toward persistent somatic symptoms: Development, validation, and reliability of the professionals' Attitude to Persistent Somatic Symptoms Questionnaire (PAPSS) Tech + touch: A pilot study to facilitate access to health information technology for Spanish-speaking parents Single-encounter elicitation framework for diagnostic excellence patient-reported measures: SEE-Dx-PRM The effectiveness of integrating making every contact count into an undergraduate medical curriculum How often are patients recording their healthcare consultations in Australia and why? An online survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1