评估针对大学生的混合创伤信息接受与承诺疗法干预的核心过程

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100852
Jacob Schachter, Alex A. Ajayi, Jesus E. Delgado
{"title":"评估针对大学生的混合创伤信息接受与承诺疗法干预的核心过程","authors":"Jacob Schachter,&nbsp;Alex A. Ajayi,&nbsp;Jesus E. Delgado","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is based on the psychological flexibility model, underpinned by six core processes: contact with the present moment, acceptance, cognitive defusion, self as context, values, and committed action. The current study examined the roles of these processes in the first randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of a mental health promotion intervention for college students based on Trauma-Focused ACT (TFACT; Ajayi et al., 2024; Harris, 2021). The hybrid intervention combined web-based modules with peer coaching in a research laboratory setting. This current study aimed to extend those findings by empirically evaluating the theoretical components of the ACT model of psychological flexibility. Participants were 78 college students ranging between 18 and 32 years of age. It was found that the level of changes in awareness, self as context, values, and committed action were significantly different between the intervention and control groups, while psychological inflexibility, acceptance, and cognitive fusion were not. Simple regressions suggested that changes in psychological inflexibility significantly predicted changes in life satisfaction at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up. Whereas, changes in psychological inflexibility predicted changes in psychological distress only at follow-up. Furthermore, penalized regressions suggested awareness and cognitive fusion significantly predicted changes in psychological distress, but did not predict changes in psychological inflexibility or life satisfaction. The current study adds to the knowledge base regarding the process of change in ACT interventions to inform the design and implementation of more targeted and effective mental health interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100852"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the core processes of a hybrid trauma-informed acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for college students\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Schachter,&nbsp;Alex A. Ajayi,&nbsp;Jesus E. Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is based on the psychological flexibility model, underpinned by six core processes: contact with the present moment, acceptance, cognitive defusion, self as context, values, and committed action. The current study examined the roles of these processes in the first randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of a mental health promotion intervention for college students based on Trauma-Focused ACT (TFACT; Ajayi et al., 2024; Harris, 2021). The hybrid intervention combined web-based modules with peer coaching in a research laboratory setting. This current study aimed to extend those findings by empirically evaluating the theoretical components of the ACT model of psychological flexibility. Participants were 78 college students ranging between 18 and 32 years of age. It was found that the level of changes in awareness, self as context, values, and committed action were significantly different between the intervention and control groups, while psychological inflexibility, acceptance, and cognitive fusion were not. Simple regressions suggested that changes in psychological inflexibility significantly predicted changes in life satisfaction at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up. Whereas, changes in psychological inflexibility predicted changes in psychological distress only at follow-up. Furthermore, penalized regressions suggested awareness and cognitive fusion significantly predicted changes in psychological distress, but did not predict changes in psychological inflexibility or life satisfaction. The current study adds to the knowledge base regarding the process of change in ACT interventions to inform the design and implementation of more targeted and effective mental health interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100852\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724001327\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724001327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)以心理弹性模型为基础,由六个核心过程支撑:与当下接触、接纳、认知化解、自我为背景、价值观和承诺行动。本研究在首个随机对照试验中考察了这些过程的作用,该试验以创伤为重点的 ACT(TFACT;Ajayi 等人,2024 年;Harris,2021 年)为基础,考察了大学生心理健康促进干预的效果。该混合干预将基于网络的模块与研究实验室环境中的同伴辅导相结合。本研究旨在通过对心理灵活性 ACT 模型的理论组成部分进行实证评估来扩展这些研究结果。参与者为 78 名大学生,年龄在 18 岁至 32 岁之间。研究发现,干预组和对照组在意识、作为情境的自我、价值观和承诺行动方面的变化水平有显著差异,而心理不灵活、接受和认知融合则没有差异。简单的回归结果表明,在干预后和 3 个月的随访中,心理不灵活程度的变化能明显预测生活满意度的变化。而心理不灵活度的变化只能预测随访时心理困扰的变化。此外,惩罚回归表明,意识和认知融合可显著预测心理困扰的变化,但不能预测心理不灵活度或生活满意度的变化。本研究补充了有关 ACT 干预变化过程的知识库,为设计和实施更有针对性、更有效的心理健康干预措施提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the core processes of a hybrid trauma-informed acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for college students
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is based on the psychological flexibility model, underpinned by six core processes: contact with the present moment, acceptance, cognitive defusion, self as context, values, and committed action. The current study examined the roles of these processes in the first randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of a mental health promotion intervention for college students based on Trauma-Focused ACT (TFACT; Ajayi et al., 2024; Harris, 2021). The hybrid intervention combined web-based modules with peer coaching in a research laboratory setting. This current study aimed to extend those findings by empirically evaluating the theoretical components of the ACT model of psychological flexibility. Participants were 78 college students ranging between 18 and 32 years of age. It was found that the level of changes in awareness, self as context, values, and committed action were significantly different between the intervention and control groups, while psychological inflexibility, acceptance, and cognitive fusion were not. Simple regressions suggested that changes in psychological inflexibility significantly predicted changes in life satisfaction at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up. Whereas, changes in psychological inflexibility predicted changes in psychological distress only at follow-up. Furthermore, penalized regressions suggested awareness and cognitive fusion significantly predicted changes in psychological distress, but did not predict changes in psychological inflexibility or life satisfaction. The current study adds to the knowledge base regarding the process of change in ACT interventions to inform the design and implementation of more targeted and effective mental health interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
期刊最新文献
A mixed methods study investigating alexithymia, experiential avoidance, and psychological distress: Insights into men with high externally oriented thinking Transforming strain into strength: Alleviating stress and burnout in special education teachers with ACT matrix intervention Introduction to the special issue on process-based therapy Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for pediatric chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic review Examining item content across nine psychological (in)flexibility scales: What do they measure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1