通过沃伦弹簧内聚力试验探索药粉内聚力

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Advanced Powder Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.apt.2024.104745
Zankrut D. Vyas , Amit Sen , Abhishek Shetty , Gerardo Callegari , Fernando J. Muzzio , Sonia M. Razavi
{"title":"通过沃伦弹簧内聚力试验探索药粉内聚力","authors":"Zankrut D. Vyas ,&nbsp;Amit Sen ,&nbsp;Abhishek Shetty ,&nbsp;Gerardo Callegari ,&nbsp;Fernando J. Muzzio ,&nbsp;Sonia M. Razavi","doi":"10.1016/j.apt.2024.104745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding bulk powder flow properties is crucial in pharmaceutical manufacturing to prevent material handling issues and ensure consistent product quality. Cohesion, a key factor influencing powder flow, is typically evaluated indirectly through methods such as the angle of repose and shear cell testing. This investigation explores the Warren Spring cohesion test, less common in the pharmaceutical industry, that directly measures powder cohesion. The test determines powder shear strength by rotating a paddle with vanes in a pre-compacted powder bed and<!--> <!-->applying torque without normal stress on the shear plane. The resulting Warren Spring cohesion strength, <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>S</mi><mrow><mi>WSC</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>, was normalized by the conditioned bulk density, showing a strong linear correlation with the penetration force of the paddle. The slope of this relationship allows for a<!--> <!-->direct comparison of cohesion across materials. Notably, the <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>S</mi><mrow><mi>WSC</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> was unaffected by pre-compaction stresses, demonstrating the consistency of this method. By controlling the penetration force, a simpler and faster method for testing cohesion across different powders was established. The correlation between the Warren Spring tester and the Brookfield powder flow tester was confirmed, highlighting the advantages of quicker assessments with the Warren Spring cohesion test, despite the shear cell’s greater sensitivity in certain situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7232,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Powder Technology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring pharmaceutical powder cohesion through the Warren Spring cohesion test\",\"authors\":\"Zankrut D. Vyas ,&nbsp;Amit Sen ,&nbsp;Abhishek Shetty ,&nbsp;Gerardo Callegari ,&nbsp;Fernando J. Muzzio ,&nbsp;Sonia M. Razavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apt.2024.104745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding bulk powder flow properties is crucial in pharmaceutical manufacturing to prevent material handling issues and ensure consistent product quality. Cohesion, a key factor influencing powder flow, is typically evaluated indirectly through methods such as the angle of repose and shear cell testing. This investigation explores the Warren Spring cohesion test, less common in the pharmaceutical industry, that directly measures powder cohesion. The test determines powder shear strength by rotating a paddle with vanes in a pre-compacted powder bed and<!--> <!-->applying torque without normal stress on the shear plane. The resulting Warren Spring cohesion strength, <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>S</mi><mrow><mi>WSC</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>, was normalized by the conditioned bulk density, showing a strong linear correlation with the penetration force of the paddle. The slope of this relationship allows for a<!--> <!-->direct comparison of cohesion across materials. Notably, the <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>S</mi><mrow><mi>WSC</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> was unaffected by pre-compaction stresses, demonstrating the consistency of this method. By controlling the penetration force, a simpler and faster method for testing cohesion across different powders was established. The correlation between the Warren Spring tester and the Brookfield powder flow tester was confirmed, highlighting the advantages of quicker assessments with the Warren Spring cohesion test, despite the shear cell’s greater sensitivity in certain situations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Powder Technology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Powder Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921883124004229\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Powder Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921883124004229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解散装粉末的流动特性对于制药业防止材料处理问题和确保产品质量稳定至关重要。内聚力是影响粉末流动的一个关键因素,通常通过休止角和剪切池测试等方法进行间接评估。本研究探讨了在制药行业不太常见的 Warren Spring 内聚力测试,该测试可直接测量粉末的内聚力。该试验通过在预压实的粉末床中旋转带叶片的桨叶,并在剪切面上施加不带法向应力的扭矩来确定粉末的剪切强度。得出的沃伦弹簧内聚强度(SWSC)按条件松密度归一化,显示出与桨的穿透力有很强的线性关系。通过这种关系的斜率可以直接比较不同材料的内聚力。值得注意的是,SWSC 不受压实前应力的影响,证明了这种方法的一致性。通过控制穿透力,建立了一种更简单、更快速的方法来测试不同粉末的内聚力。沃伦弹簧测试仪和布鲁克菲尔德粉末流动测试仪之间的相关性得到了证实,突出了沃伦弹簧内聚力测试更快评估的优势,尽管在某些情况下剪切池的灵敏度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring pharmaceutical powder cohesion through the Warren Spring cohesion test
Understanding bulk powder flow properties is crucial in pharmaceutical manufacturing to prevent material handling issues and ensure consistent product quality. Cohesion, a key factor influencing powder flow, is typically evaluated indirectly through methods such as the angle of repose and shear cell testing. This investigation explores the Warren Spring cohesion test, less common in the pharmaceutical industry, that directly measures powder cohesion. The test determines powder shear strength by rotating a paddle with vanes in a pre-compacted powder bed and applying torque without normal stress on the shear plane. The resulting Warren Spring cohesion strength, SWSC, was normalized by the conditioned bulk density, showing a strong linear correlation with the penetration force of the paddle. The slope of this relationship allows for a direct comparison of cohesion across materials. Notably, the SWSC was unaffected by pre-compaction stresses, demonstrating the consistency of this method. By controlling the penetration force, a simpler and faster method for testing cohesion across different powders was established. The correlation between the Warren Spring tester and the Brookfield powder flow tester was confirmed, highlighting the advantages of quicker assessments with the Warren Spring cohesion test, despite the shear cell’s greater sensitivity in certain situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Powder Technology
Advanced Powder Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
424
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Advanced Powder Technology is to meet the demand for an international journal that integrates all aspects of science and technology research on powder and particulate materials. The journal fulfills this purpose by publishing original research papers, rapid communications, reviews, and translated articles by prominent researchers worldwide. The editorial work of Advanced Powder Technology, which was founded as the International Journal of the Society of Powder Technology, Japan, is now shared by distinguished board members, who operate in a unique framework designed to respond to the increasing global demand for articles on not only powder and particles, but also on various materials produced from them. Advanced Powder Technology covers various areas, but a discussion of powder and particles is required in articles. Topics include: Production of powder and particulate materials in gases and liquids(nanoparticles, fine ceramics, pharmaceuticals, novel functional materials, etc.); Aerosol and colloidal processing; Powder and particle characterization; Dynamics and phenomena; Calculation and simulation (CFD, DEM, Monte Carlo method, population balance, etc.); Measurement and control of powder processes; Particle modification; Comminution; Powder handling and operations (storage, transport, granulation, separation, fluidization, etc.)
期刊最新文献
Impact of acid surface pretreatment on the aggregation and flotation behavior of micro-fine ilmenite and its functional mechanism Comparative study of powder characteristics and mechanical properties of Al2024 nanocomposites reinforced with carbon-based additives Study on the hybrid explosion mechanism of multicomponent combustible gas-coal dust in a coal spontaneous combustion environment Comparison of impact and compression stress in single particle breakage phenomena of multi-component systems Effects of mineral species transformation driven by surface dielectric barrier discharge plasma modification on the flotation performances: Perspective of critical oxidation degree
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1