{"title":"利用机器学习以数据为驱动设计高体积模量高熵合金","authors":"Sandeep Jain , Reliance Jain , Vinod Kumar , Sumanta Samal","doi":"10.1016/j.jalmes.2024.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the current research, machine learning (ML) models were used as a tool for predicting the bulk modulus of High Entropy Alloys (HEAs). ML was employed to optimize HEA compositions for superior bulk modulus values. The study assessed five regression models: Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), XGBoost (XGB), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Lasso regression. The XGB regression model delivered the best results, with an R-squared (R<sup>2</sup>) value of 95.2 % and an RMSE of 2.6 % on the validation dataset. The XGB model's performance was further validated by experimental work, showing an R<sup>2</sup> value of 94.8 % and an RMSE of 3.6 %. The R-squared, RMSE, and MAE values during training, testing, and validation for the XGB model ranged from 93.2 % to 99.62 %, 0.97 to 3.64, and 0.12 to 1, respectively. Furthermore, we used the top three trained models to predict the bulk modulus of six new HEAs that were not part of the training, testing, or validation datasets. These predictions achieved R² values of 94.8 %, 93.4 %, and 92.4 %, RMSE values of 3.6 %, 4.1 %, and 4.4 %, along with MAE values of 3.4 %, 3.8 %, and 4.1 %, for the XGB, Lasso, and SVR models, respectively. This work advances the field by bridging the gap in HEA discovery and property evaluation, offering novel methods for designing HEAs with desirable bulk modulus values, and unlocking new possibilities for HEA applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-driven design of high bulk modulus high entropy alloys using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Sandeep Jain , Reliance Jain , Vinod Kumar , Sumanta Samal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jalmes.2024.100128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the current research, machine learning (ML) models were used as a tool for predicting the bulk modulus of High Entropy Alloys (HEAs). ML was employed to optimize HEA compositions for superior bulk modulus values. The study assessed five regression models: Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), XGBoost (XGB), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Lasso regression. The XGB regression model delivered the best results, with an R-squared (R<sup>2</sup>) value of 95.2 % and an RMSE of 2.6 % on the validation dataset. The XGB model's performance was further validated by experimental work, showing an R<sup>2</sup> value of 94.8 % and an RMSE of 3.6 %. The R-squared, RMSE, and MAE values during training, testing, and validation for the XGB model ranged from 93.2 % to 99.62 %, 0.97 to 3.64, and 0.12 to 1, respectively. Furthermore, we used the top three trained models to predict the bulk modulus of six new HEAs that were not part of the training, testing, or validation datasets. These predictions achieved R² values of 94.8 %, 93.4 %, and 92.4 %, RMSE values of 3.6 %, 4.1 %, and 4.4 %, along with MAE values of 3.4 %, 3.8 %, and 4.1 %, for the XGB, Lasso, and SVR models, respectively. This work advances the field by bridging the gap in HEA discovery and property evaluation, offering novel methods for designing HEAs with desirable bulk modulus values, and unlocking new possibilities for HEA applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949917824000762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949917824000762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在目前的研究中,机器学习(ML)模型被用作预测高熵合金(HEAs)体积模量的工具。机器学习模型被用于优化 HEA 成分,以获得优异的体积模量值。研究评估了五个回归模型:随机森林 (RF)、K-近邻 (KNN)、XGBoost (XGB)、支持向量回归 (SVR) 和 Lasso 回归。XGB 回归模型的结果最好,在验证数据集上的 R 平方 (R2) 值为 95.2%,RMSE 为 2.6%。实验工作进一步验证了 XGB 模型的性能,其 R2 值为 94.8%,RMSE 为 3.6%。XGB 模型在训练、测试和验证过程中的 R 平方、RMSE 和 MAE 值范围分别为 93.2 % 到 99.62 %、0.97 到 3.64 以及 0.12 到 1。此外,我们还使用训练后的前三个模型来预测不属于训练、测试或验证数据集的六种新 HEA 的体积模量。XGB 模型、Lasso 模型和 SVR 模型的 R² 值分别为 94.8%、93.4% 和 92.4%,RMSE 值分别为 3.6%、4.1% 和 4.4%,MAE 值分别为 3.4%、3.8% 和 4.1%。这项研究填补了 HEA 发现和性能评估方面的空白,为设计具有理想体积模量值的 HEA 提供了新方法,并为 HEA 的应用开辟了新的可能性,从而推动了该领域的发展。
Data-driven design of high bulk modulus high entropy alloys using machine learning
In the current research, machine learning (ML) models were used as a tool for predicting the bulk modulus of High Entropy Alloys (HEAs). ML was employed to optimize HEA compositions for superior bulk modulus values. The study assessed five regression models: Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), XGBoost (XGB), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Lasso regression. The XGB regression model delivered the best results, with an R-squared (R2) value of 95.2 % and an RMSE of 2.6 % on the validation dataset. The XGB model's performance was further validated by experimental work, showing an R2 value of 94.8 % and an RMSE of 3.6 %. The R-squared, RMSE, and MAE values during training, testing, and validation for the XGB model ranged from 93.2 % to 99.62 %, 0.97 to 3.64, and 0.12 to 1, respectively. Furthermore, we used the top three trained models to predict the bulk modulus of six new HEAs that were not part of the training, testing, or validation datasets. These predictions achieved R² values of 94.8 %, 93.4 %, and 92.4 %, RMSE values of 3.6 %, 4.1 %, and 4.4 %, along with MAE values of 3.4 %, 3.8 %, and 4.1 %, for the XGB, Lasso, and SVR models, respectively. This work advances the field by bridging the gap in HEA discovery and property evaluation, offering novel methods for designing HEAs with desirable bulk modulus values, and unlocking new possibilities for HEA applications.