重新认识设计谈话中的价值概念

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sheji.2024.08.003
Liz Cooper
{"title":"重新认识设计谈话中的价值概念","authors":"Liz Cooper","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Designers are encouraged to incorporate values in their practice as a way of making outcomes more ethical. Values are conceptualized as inner mental preferences that inform decisions. Methodologies such as value sensitive design advise on how to collate stakeholders’ values, treating values as identifiable through asking people about them. This article offers a different way of looking at values, using discursive psychology to analyze what designers do in their responses when they are asked about values in interviews. The analysis shows that when participants are asked about the influence of values in their work, many seek to justify them by explaining where they came from. Difficulty is found when they attempt to describe how values influence their decisions. The findings suggest that asking people to identify their values may be problematic since responses may involve situated identity management rather than revealing underlying mental states.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 265-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing the Notion of Values in Design Talk\",\"authors\":\"Liz Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sheji.2024.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Designers are encouraged to incorporate values in their practice as a way of making outcomes more ethical. Values are conceptualized as inner mental preferences that inform decisions. Methodologies such as value sensitive design advise on how to collate stakeholders’ values, treating values as identifiable through asking people about them. This article offers a different way of looking at values, using discursive psychology to analyze what designers do in their responses when they are asked about values in interviews. The analysis shows that when participants are asked about the influence of values in their work, many seek to justify them by explaining where they came from. Difficulty is found when they attempt to describe how values influence their decisions. The findings suggest that asking people to identify their values may be problematic since responses may involve situated identity management rather than revealing underlying mental states.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 265-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000753\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们鼓励设计师在实践中融入价值观,使设计成果更符合道德规范。价值观在概念上是一种内在的心理偏好,为决策提供依据。价值敏感设计等方法论就如何整理利益相关者的价值观提出了建议,将价值观视为可以通过询问人们来识别的。本文提供了一种看待价值观的不同方法,利用辨证心理学来分析设计师在访谈中被问及价值观时的回答。分析表明,当参与者被问及价值观对其工作的影响时,许多人都会试图通过解释价值观的来源来证明其合理性。当他们试图描述价值观如何影响他们的决策时,就会发现困难重重。研究结果表明,要求人们确定自己的价值观可能会有问题,因为回答可能涉及情景身份管理,而不是揭示潜在的心理状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reconceptualizing the Notion of Values in Design Talk
Designers are encouraged to incorporate values in their practice as a way of making outcomes more ethical. Values are conceptualized as inner mental preferences that inform decisions. Methodologies such as value sensitive design advise on how to collate stakeholders’ values, treating values as identifiable through asking people about them. This article offers a different way of looking at values, using discursive psychology to analyze what designers do in their responses when they are asked about values in interviews. The analysis shows that when participants are asked about the influence of values in their work, many seek to justify them by explaining where they came from. Difficulty is found when they attempt to describe how values influence their decisions. The findings suggest that asking people to identify their values may be problematic since responses may involve situated identity management rather than revealing underlying mental states.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Reconceptualizing the Notion of Values in Design Talk Value Dimensions in Creative Collaborations for Social Innovation The Tools of the Trade: Cultures, Devices, and Valuation Practices in Urban Design Creating and Testing a Guideline for Governing Blockchain Ecosystems: A Study Informed by Design Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1