重新评估定期更换短期中心静脉导管的必要性:全面回顾性叙述

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100420
Regev Cohen
{"title":"重新评估定期更换短期中心静脉导管的必要性:全面回顾性叙述","authors":"Regev Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in modern healthcare but are associated with significant risks, particularly catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Current guidelines do not recommend routine replacement of CVCs based on time alone. However, recent evidence challenges this recommendation. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies exploring the risk-factors of short-term, non-hemodialysis CVCs, that were published in the last two decades while including seminal older works for context. The guidelines regarding scheduled CVC-replacement are not based on sufficiently convincing data. Current literature establishes the significance of CVC-duration as a major risk-factor for CRBSI occurrence, especially after 9–14 days of catheter-dwelling. The daily CRBSI risk is probably not constant, and the cumulative risk may reach high rates after 9–14 days, especially for femoral and jugular insertions compared to the subclavian site, suggesting potential benefits of scheduled CVC replacement, especially for non-subclavian catheters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessing the need for scheduled replacement of short term central venous catheters: A narrative comprehensive review\",\"authors\":\"Regev Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in modern healthcare but are associated with significant risks, particularly catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Current guidelines do not recommend routine replacement of CVCs based on time alone. However, recent evidence challenges this recommendation. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies exploring the risk-factors of short-term, non-hemodialysis CVCs, that were published in the last two decades while including seminal older works for context. The guidelines regarding scheduled CVC-replacement are not based on sufficiently convincing data. Current literature establishes the significance of CVC-duration as a major risk-factor for CRBSI occurrence, especially after 9–14 days of catheter-dwelling. The daily CRBSI risk is probably not constant, and the cumulative risk may reach high rates after 9–14 days, especially for femoral and jugular insertions compared to the subclavian site, suggesting potential benefits of scheduled CVC replacement, especially for non-subclavian catheters.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中心静脉导管 (CVC) 是现代医疗保健中不可或缺的设备,但也存在很大的风险,尤其是与导管相关的血流感染 (CRBSI)。目前的指南不建议仅根据时间来常规更换 CVC。然而,最近的证据对这一建议提出了质疑。我们进行了一次全面的文献综述,重点关注过去二十年中发表的探讨短期非血液透析用 CVC 风险因素的研究,同时纳入了一些具有开创性的旧文献以作为参考。关于定期更换 CVC 的指导原则并没有以足够令人信服的数据为基础。目前的文献证实,CVC 的持续时间是 CRBSI 发生的主要风险因素,尤其是在导管留置 9-14 天之后。每天发生 CRBSI 的风险可能并不恒定,9-14 天后累积风险可能会达到很高的水平,尤其是与锁骨下部位相比,股骨和颈静脉插入部位的风险更高,这表明定期更换 CVC(尤其是非锁骨下导管)具有潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reassessing the need for scheduled replacement of short term central venous catheters: A narrative comprehensive review
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in modern healthcare but are associated with significant risks, particularly catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Current guidelines do not recommend routine replacement of CVCs based on time alone. However, recent evidence challenges this recommendation. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies exploring the risk-factors of short-term, non-hemodialysis CVCs, that were published in the last two decades while including seminal older works for context. The guidelines regarding scheduled CVC-replacement are not based on sufficiently convincing data. Current literature establishes the significance of CVC-duration as a major risk-factor for CRBSI occurrence, especially after 9–14 days of catheter-dwelling. The daily CRBSI risk is probably not constant, and the cumulative risk may reach high rates after 9–14 days, especially for femoral and jugular insertions compared to the subclavian site, suggesting potential benefits of scheduled CVC replacement, especially for non-subclavian catheters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in paediatric patients: a multivariate analysis Feasibility of hand disinfection in paediatric advanced life support (PALS): A simulation study Reassessing the need for scheduled replacement of short term central venous catheters: A narrative comprehensive review Rapid implementation of a clinical decision-support workflow during the national blood culture bottle shortage Low prevalence of borderline oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) in a tertiary care hospital in South Carolina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1