随着年龄的增长,"互联网 "对我们意味着什么?跨代技术领域概念化的多任务调查

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100531
Ilenia Falcinelli , Chiara Fini , Claudia Mazzuca , Guido Alessandri , Fabio Alivernini , Roberto Baiocco , Andrea Chirico , Lorenzo Filosa , Tommaso Palombi , Jessica Pistella , Simone Tavolucci , Fabio Lucidi , Anna M. Borghi
{"title":"随着年龄的增长,\"互联网 \"对我们意味着什么?跨代技术领域概念化的多任务调查","authors":"Ilenia Falcinelli ,&nbsp;Chiara Fini ,&nbsp;Claudia Mazzuca ,&nbsp;Guido Alessandri ,&nbsp;Fabio Alivernini ,&nbsp;Roberto Baiocco ,&nbsp;Andrea Chirico ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Filosa ,&nbsp;Tommaso Palombi ,&nbsp;Jessica Pistella ,&nbsp;Simone Tavolucci ,&nbsp;Fabio Lucidi ,&nbsp;Anna M. Borghi","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technological progress is increasing rapidly, and keeping up is particularly challenging for older adults. Thus, adapting technological innovations to human needs has become urgent. The first step toward this aim is to understand <em>how people conceptualize technology.</em> Here, we asked 54 younger and 54 older adults to perform a Go/No-Go, a rating, and a feature generation task to investigate the processing and representation of Technological concepts (e.g., “<em>Internet</em>”) compared to Abstract (e.g., “<em>logic</em>”) and Concrete concepts (e.g., “<em>bottle</em>”). Younger adults showed an elaboration advantage for Technological upon Abstract and Concrete concepts. Technological concepts exhibited a <em>hybrid</em> character, but in older adults, they had a more abstract characterization. Finally, the semantic knowledge associated with Technology was differently organized in content across generations and less structurally robust in older adults. Overall, our results highlight how concepts flexibly change across life and can help societal policies to increase awareness in technology-use across generations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100531"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does “Internet” mean to us as we age? A multi-task investigation on the conceptualization of the technological domain across generations\",\"authors\":\"Ilenia Falcinelli ,&nbsp;Chiara Fini ,&nbsp;Claudia Mazzuca ,&nbsp;Guido Alessandri ,&nbsp;Fabio Alivernini ,&nbsp;Roberto Baiocco ,&nbsp;Andrea Chirico ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Filosa ,&nbsp;Tommaso Palombi ,&nbsp;Jessica Pistella ,&nbsp;Simone Tavolucci ,&nbsp;Fabio Lucidi ,&nbsp;Anna M. Borghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Technological progress is increasing rapidly, and keeping up is particularly challenging for older adults. Thus, adapting technological innovations to human needs has become urgent. The first step toward this aim is to understand <em>how people conceptualize technology.</em> Here, we asked 54 younger and 54 older adults to perform a Go/No-Go, a rating, and a feature generation task to investigate the processing and representation of Technological concepts (e.g., “<em>Internet</em>”) compared to Abstract (e.g., “<em>logic</em>”) and Concrete concepts (e.g., “<em>bottle</em>”). Younger adults showed an elaboration advantage for Technological upon Abstract and Concrete concepts. Technological concepts exhibited a <em>hybrid</em> character, but in older adults, they had a more abstract characterization. Finally, the semantic knowledge associated with Technology was differently organized in content across generations and less structurally robust in older adults. Overall, our results highlight how concepts flexibly change across life and can help societal policies to increase awareness in technology-use across generations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824001647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824001647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科技进步日新月异,对于老年人来说,跟上科技进步的步伐尤其具有挑战性。因此,让技术创新适应人类需求已变得刻不容缓。实现这一目标的第一步是了解人们如何看待技术。在这里,我们让 54 位年轻人和 54 位老年人分别完成了一个 "去/不去"、一个评级和一个特征生成任务,以研究技术概念(如 "互联网")与抽象概念(如 "逻辑")和具体概念(如 "瓶子")相比的处理和表征。与抽象概念和具体概念相比,年龄较小的成年人在阐述技术概念方面表现出优势。技术概念表现出混合的特征,但在老年人中,技术概念更具有抽象的特征。最后,与 "技术 "相关的语义知识在内容组织上各代人有所不同,老年人的语义知识在结构上不够稳健。总之,我们的研究结果凸显了概念在生活中的灵活变化,有助于社会政策提高各代人的技术使用意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What does “Internet” mean to us as we age? A multi-task investigation on the conceptualization of the technological domain across generations
Technological progress is increasing rapidly, and keeping up is particularly challenging for older adults. Thus, adapting technological innovations to human needs has become urgent. The first step toward this aim is to understand how people conceptualize technology. Here, we asked 54 younger and 54 older adults to perform a Go/No-Go, a rating, and a feature generation task to investigate the processing and representation of Technological concepts (e.g., “Internet”) compared to Abstract (e.g., “logic”) and Concrete concepts (e.g., “bottle”). Younger adults showed an elaboration advantage for Technological upon Abstract and Concrete concepts. Technological concepts exhibited a hybrid character, but in older adults, they had a more abstract characterization. Finally, the semantic knowledge associated with Technology was differently organized in content across generations and less structurally robust in older adults. Overall, our results highlight how concepts flexibly change across life and can help societal policies to increase awareness in technology-use across generations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of social media reports on nurses’ job satisfaction: A cross-section suvery I Don't matter anyway. Will more Instagram change that? Anti-mattering and Instagram Feed vs. stories addiction symptoms: The moderating roles of loneliness and life satisfaction Surprising gender biases in GPT IT really matters: Associations of computer hassles and technical support with medically certified sickness absence due to mental health complaints Effect of business intelligence on organizational competitiveness- exploring the mediation of technology anxiety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1