{"title":"用 3 分钟测量智力:巴德雷推理测验的并发、趋同和区分效度","authors":"Adrian Furnham","doi":"10.1002/acp.4244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper used the author's full data archive to examine the correlates of the Baddeley Reasoning Test (BRT) in six studies with a student population. The correlations between the BRT and Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT), a 12-min, well-established American test of general intelligence, ranged from 0.46 < <i>r</i> < 0.65 in six data sets. Correlations (uncorrected) with a measure of General Knowledge in three studies showed 0.17 < <i>r</i> < 0.36. BRT scores correlated with the Raven's Progressive Matrices <i>r</i> = 0.59. Correlations with a creativity test in four studies was, as predicted, not statistically significant. The usefulness of the BRT is discussed, along with its limitations, particularly criterion-related validity and range restrictions with attenuation of correlations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Intelligence in 3 Min: Concurrent, Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Baddeley Reasoning Test\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Furnham\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acp.4244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This paper used the author's full data archive to examine the correlates of the Baddeley Reasoning Test (BRT) in six studies with a student population. The correlations between the BRT and Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT), a 12-min, well-established American test of general intelligence, ranged from 0.46 < <i>r</i> < 0.65 in six data sets. Correlations (uncorrected) with a measure of General Knowledge in three studies showed 0.17 < <i>r</i> < 0.36. BRT scores correlated with the Raven's Progressive Matrices <i>r</i> = 0.59. Correlations with a creativity test in four studies was, as predicted, not statistically significant. The usefulness of the BRT is discussed, along with its limitations, particularly criterion-related validity and range restrictions with attenuation of correlations.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.4244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.4244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文利用作者的完整数据档案,研究了巴德利推理测验(BRT)在六项学生研究中的相关性。在六组数据中,巴德利推理测验与Wonderlic人事测验(Wonderlic Personnel Test,WPT)之间的相关系数为0.46 < r < 0.65,Wonderlic人事测验是一项12分钟的美国著名智力测验。在三项研究中,与常识测量的相关性(未校正)为 0.17 < r < 0.36。BRT 分数与 Raven's Progressive Matrices 的相关性 r = 0.59。四项研究中与创造力测试的相关性,正如预测的那样,在统计上并不显著。本文讨论了 BRT 的实用性及其局限性,特别是与标准相关的有效性和相关性衰减的范围限制。
Measuring Intelligence in 3 Min: Concurrent, Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Baddeley Reasoning Test
This paper used the author's full data archive to examine the correlates of the Baddeley Reasoning Test (BRT) in six studies with a student population. The correlations between the BRT and Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT), a 12-min, well-established American test of general intelligence, ranged from 0.46 < r < 0.65 in six data sets. Correlations (uncorrected) with a measure of General Knowledge in three studies showed 0.17 < r < 0.36. BRT scores correlated with the Raven's Progressive Matrices r = 0.59. Correlations with a creativity test in four studies was, as predicted, not statistically significant. The usefulness of the BRT is discussed, along with its limitations, particularly criterion-related validity and range restrictions with attenuation of correlations.
期刊介绍:
Applied Cognitive Psychology seeks to publish the best papers dealing with psychological analyses of memory, learning, thinking, problem solving, language, and consciousness as they occur in the real world. Applied Cognitive Psychology will publish papers on a wide variety of issues and from diverse theoretical perspectives. The journal focuses on studies of human performance and basic cognitive skills in everyday environments including, but not restricted to, studies of eyewitness memory, autobiographical memory, spatial cognition, skill training, expertise and skilled behaviour. Articles will normally combine realistic investigations of real world events with appropriate theoretical analyses and proper appraisal of practical implications.