经皮进入腋动脉进行血管内介入治疗的可行性和安全性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.10.018
Caleb D. Alterman, Anton D. Perera, Prateek K. Gupta, Daniel M. Alterman
{"title":"经皮进入腋动脉进行血管内介入治疗的可行性和安全性。","authors":"Caleb D. Alterman,&nbsp;Anton D. Perera,&nbsp;Prateek K. Gupta,&nbsp;Daniel M. Alterman","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease requires safe and reliable arterial access. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of percutaneous axillary artery access for endovascular therapy. A variety of anatomic and logistic obstacles can be overcome with upper extremity access. In this retrospective case review, we describe our experience with percutaneous trans-axillary access for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medical records of all patients undergoing axillary artery percutaneous access from December 2021 to August 2024 were reviewed. Demographic data, procedural details, and complications such as pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, nerve injury, and closure device success were analyzed. Technical success and perioperative complications—including bruising, edema, hematoma, nerve injury, infection, thrombosis, and pseudoaneurysm—were assessed. Clinical outcomes were analyzed via follow-up clinic records.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study period, 79 axillary artery accesses were performed on 64 patients. The patients were 55% male and had typical vascular comorbidities: hypertension (87%), hyperlipidemia (68%), coronary artery disease (27%), stroke (19%), and diabetes (16%); 58% were active tobacco users, and 80% were former tobacco users. Axillary access facilitated peripheral endovascular procedures, including iliac intervention (55), femoral (44), mesenteric (16), tibial (11), and embolization or visceral aneurysm treatments. A 6F sheath and ultrasound-guided Angio-Seal closure device were uniformly employed, with no major complications, perioperative deaths, or reoperations required. Minor complications of bruising and edema were present in 11 patients (14%). Other minor complications such as hematoma, nerve injury, thrombosis, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, or limb ischemia were absent.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Percutaneous axillary artery access demonstrates promise for complex endovascular interventions with a favorable safety profile. Advantages include avoidance of unfavorable femoral anatomy, improved working length compared with radial access, and enhanced control of visceral therapy. Bilateral iliac and lower extremity therapy is feasible in a single treatment as well. Percutaneous axillary artery access is a safe, reliable adjunct for enhancing endovascular arterial intervention capabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 194-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and Safety of Endovascular Interventions via Percutaneous Access to the Axillary Artery\",\"authors\":\"Caleb D. Alterman,&nbsp;Anton D. Perera,&nbsp;Prateek K. Gupta,&nbsp;Daniel M. Alterman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.10.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease requires safe and reliable arterial access. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of percutaneous axillary artery access for endovascular therapy. A variety of anatomic and logistic obstacles can be overcome with upper extremity access. In this retrospective case review, we describe our experience with percutaneous trans-axillary access for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medical records of all patients undergoing axillary artery percutaneous access from December 2021 to August 2024 were reviewed. Demographic data, procedural details, and complications such as pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, nerve injury, and closure device success were analyzed. Technical success and perioperative complications—including bruising, edema, hematoma, nerve injury, infection, thrombosis, and pseudoaneurysm—were assessed. Clinical outcomes were analyzed via follow-up clinic records.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study period, 79 axillary artery accesses were performed on 64 patients. The patients were 55% male and had typical vascular comorbidities: hypertension (87%), hyperlipidemia (68%), coronary artery disease (27%), stroke (19%), and diabetes (16%); 58% were active tobacco users, and 80% were former tobacco users. Axillary access facilitated peripheral endovascular procedures, including iliac intervention (55), femoral (44), mesenteric (16), tibial (11), and embolization or visceral aneurysm treatments. A 6F sheath and ultrasound-guided Angio-Seal closure device were uniformly employed, with no major complications, perioperative deaths, or reoperations required. Minor complications of bruising and edema were present in 11 patients (14%). Other minor complications such as hematoma, nerve injury, thrombosis, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, or limb ischemia were absent.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Percutaneous axillary artery access demonstrates promise for complex endovascular interventions with a favorable safety profile. Advantages include avoidance of unfavorable femoral anatomy, improved working length compared with radial access, and enhanced control of visceral therapy. Bilateral iliac and lower extremity therapy is feasible in a single treatment as well. Percutaneous axillary artery access is a safe, reliable adjunct for enhancing endovascular arterial intervention capabilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 194-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624006848\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624006848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:外周动脉疾病的血管内治疗需要安全可靠的动脉通路。本研究评估了经皮腋动脉入路进行血管内治疗的可行性和安全性。上肢入路可以克服各种解剖和后勤障碍。在这篇回顾性病例回顾中,我们介绍了经皮经腋动脉入路进行下肢外周动脉疾病介入治疗的经验:方法:回顾 2021 年 12 月至 2024 年 8 月期间所有接受腋动脉经皮入路手术患者的病历。分析了人口统计学数据、手术细节以及假性动脉瘤、血肿、神经损伤和闭合装置成功率等并发症。评估了技术成功率和围手术期并发症,包括瘀伤、水肿、血肿、神经损伤、感染、血栓形成和假性动脉瘤。临床结果通过随访门诊记录进行分析:研究期间,共为 64 名患者实施了 79 例腋窝动脉入路手术。患者中55%为男性,具有典型的血管并发症:高血压(87%)、高脂血症(68%)、冠心病(27%)、中风(19%)和糖尿病(16%);58%是活跃的烟草使用者,80%曾是烟草使用者。腋窝入路为外周血管内手术提供了便利,包括髂动脉介入(55例)、股动脉介入(44例)、肠系膜动脉介入(16例)、胫骨动脉介入(11例)以及栓塞或内脏动脉瘤治疗。所有手术都使用了6F鞘和超声引导下的Angio-Seal闭合装置,没有出现重大并发症、围手术期死亡或需要再次手术。11名患者(14%)出现了瘀伤和水肿等轻微并发症。其他轻微并发症如血肿、神经损伤、血栓形成、夹层、假性动脉瘤或肢体缺血等均未出现:结论:经皮腋动脉入路有望用于复杂的血管内介入治疗,安全性良好。其优点包括避免了不利的股动脉解剖结构,与桡动脉入路相比工作长度更长,并加强了对内脏治疗的控制。双侧髂动脉和下肢的治疗也可在一次治疗中完成。经皮腋动脉入路是增强血管内动脉介入能力的一种安全可靠的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility and Safety of Endovascular Interventions via Percutaneous Access to the Axillary Artery

Background

Endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease requires safe and reliable arterial access. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of percutaneous axillary artery access for endovascular therapy. A variety of anatomic and logistic obstacles can be overcome with upper extremity access. In this retrospective case review, we describe our experience with percutaneous trans-axillary access for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease intervention.

Methods

Medical records of all patients undergoing axillary artery percutaneous access from December 2021 to August 2024 were reviewed. Demographic data, procedural details, and complications such as pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, nerve injury, and closure device success were analyzed. Technical success and perioperative complications—including bruising, edema, hematoma, nerve injury, infection, thrombosis, and pseudoaneurysm—were assessed. Clinical outcomes were analyzed via follow-up clinic records.

Results

During the study period, 79 axillary artery accesses were performed on 64 patients. The patients were 55% male and had typical vascular comorbidities: hypertension (87%), hyperlipidemia (68%), coronary artery disease (27%), stroke (19%), and diabetes (16%); 58% were active tobacco users, and 80% were former tobacco users. Axillary access facilitated peripheral endovascular procedures, including iliac intervention (55), femoral (44), mesenteric (16), tibial (11), and embolization or visceral aneurysm treatments. A 6F sheath and ultrasound-guided Angio-Seal closure device were uniformly employed, with no major complications, perioperative deaths, or reoperations required. Minor complications of bruising and edema were present in 11 patients (14%). Other minor complications such as hematoma, nerve injury, thrombosis, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, or limb ischemia were absent.

Conclusions

Percutaneous axillary artery access demonstrates promise for complex endovascular interventions with a favorable safety profile. Advantages include avoidance of unfavorable femoral anatomy, improved working length compared with radial access, and enhanced control of visceral therapy. Bilateral iliac and lower extremity therapy is feasible in a single treatment as well. Percutaneous axillary artery access is a safe, reliable adjunct for enhancing endovascular arterial intervention capabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Cognitive Impairment is Common and Unrecognized in Vascular Surgery Patients Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Hostile Artery Access: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study Open Revascularization for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia is Associated with Increased Morbidity and Mortality when Compared to Endovascular Intervention Pancreaticoduodenal Artery Aneurysm in a Patient with Celiac Artery Atresia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1