Roland N Dickerson, Allison R McLeod, Alison E Stonecipher, Julie E Farrar, Saskya Byerly, Dina M Filiberto, Peter E Fischer
{"title":"门诊糖尿病管理对营养支持期间重症患者血糖控制的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Roland N Dickerson, Allison R McLeod, Alison E Stonecipher, Julie E Farrar, Saskya Byerly, Dina M Filiberto, Peter E Fischer","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine whether successful outpatient management of diabetes, as assessed by hemoglobin A1c (Hgb A1c), influences inpatient glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients, aged >17 years, admitted to the trauma intensive care unit, who received continuous nutrition therapy, and exhibited a blood glucose concentration (BG) > 149 mg/dl or 8.3 mmol/L were retrospectively evaluated. Controlled diabetes mellitus (DM-C) was defined as a history of DM and a Hgb A1c < 7%. Uncontrolled DM (DM-U) was defined as an Hgb A1c ≥ 7%. Those without a history of DM and an Hgb A1c < 6.5% were classified as without DM (no DM). Patients were managed via intravenous regular human insulin (RHI) infusion or subcutaneous neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin with intravenous sliding scale RHI (SSI) or SSI alone. Target BG range was 70-149 mg/dl (3.9-8.3 mmol/L). Glycemic control was evaluated for the first 7 days of nutrition therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients with DM-C, 24 with DM-U, and 32 with no DM were evaluated. Despite no difference in carbohydrate intake, those with DM-U received 70 ± 54 units daily vs 15 ± 16 and 14 ± 18 units daily for the DM-C and no DM groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Target BG range was achieved for 11 ± 5 h/day vs 14 ± 7 and 16 ± 6 h/day, respectively (P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early identification of DM-U would assist in recognizing patients with difficulty achieving glycemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"134-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient diabetes management influences glycemic control for critically ill patients during nutrition support: A retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Roland N Dickerson, Allison R McLeod, Alison E Stonecipher, Julie E Farrar, Saskya Byerly, Dina M Filiberto, Peter E Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ncp.11244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine whether successful outpatient management of diabetes, as assessed by hemoglobin A1c (Hgb A1c), influences inpatient glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients, aged >17 years, admitted to the trauma intensive care unit, who received continuous nutrition therapy, and exhibited a blood glucose concentration (BG) > 149 mg/dl or 8.3 mmol/L were retrospectively evaluated. Controlled diabetes mellitus (DM-C) was defined as a history of DM and a Hgb A1c < 7%. Uncontrolled DM (DM-U) was defined as an Hgb A1c ≥ 7%. Those without a history of DM and an Hgb A1c < 6.5% were classified as without DM (no DM). Patients were managed via intravenous regular human insulin (RHI) infusion or subcutaneous neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin with intravenous sliding scale RHI (SSI) or SSI alone. Target BG range was 70-149 mg/dl (3.9-8.3 mmol/L). Glycemic control was evaluated for the first 7 days of nutrition therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients with DM-C, 24 with DM-U, and 32 with no DM were evaluated. Despite no difference in carbohydrate intake, those with DM-U received 70 ± 54 units daily vs 15 ± 16 and 14 ± 18 units daily for the DM-C and no DM groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Target BG range was achieved for 11 ± 5 h/day vs 14 ± 7 and 16 ± 6 h/day, respectively (P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early identification of DM-U would assist in recognizing patients with difficulty achieving glycemic control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"134-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outpatient diabetes management influences glycemic control for critically ill patients during nutrition support: A retrospective observational study.
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether successful outpatient management of diabetes, as assessed by hemoglobin A1c (Hgb A1c), influences inpatient glycemic control.
Methods: Adult patients, aged >17 years, admitted to the trauma intensive care unit, who received continuous nutrition therapy, and exhibited a blood glucose concentration (BG) > 149 mg/dl or 8.3 mmol/L were retrospectively evaluated. Controlled diabetes mellitus (DM-C) was defined as a history of DM and a Hgb A1c < 7%. Uncontrolled DM (DM-U) was defined as an Hgb A1c ≥ 7%. Those without a history of DM and an Hgb A1c < 6.5% were classified as without DM (no DM). Patients were managed via intravenous regular human insulin (RHI) infusion or subcutaneous neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin with intravenous sliding scale RHI (SSI) or SSI alone. Target BG range was 70-149 mg/dl (3.9-8.3 mmol/L). Glycemic control was evaluated for the first 7 days of nutrition therapy.
Results: Twenty-two patients with DM-C, 24 with DM-U, and 32 with no DM were evaluated. Despite no difference in carbohydrate intake, those with DM-U received 70 ± 54 units daily vs 15 ± 16 and 14 ± 18 units daily for the DM-C and no DM groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Target BG range was achieved for 11 ± 5 h/day vs 14 ± 7 and 16 ± 6 h/day, respectively (P = 0.01).
Conclusion: Early identification of DM-U would assist in recognizing patients with difficulty achieving glycemic control.
期刊介绍:
NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).