Eytan Kaplan, Avichai Weissbach, Gili Kadmon, Elhanan Nahum, Jerry Stein
{"title":"在儿科重症监护室使用外周动静脉通路进行血浆置换。","authors":"Eytan Kaplan, Avichai Weissbach, Gili Kadmon, Elhanan Nahum, Jerry Stein","doi":"10.1111/trf.18075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a vital therapeutic modality in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) for various indications. Traditionally, pediatric TPE is performed via a large bore, double lumen catheter, whose insertion necessitates deep sedation, and poses risk of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Building on our previous success utilizing percutaneous radial artery catheters (ALs) for apheresis procedures, we present our experience with ALs for TPE procedures in the PICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study, conducted in the PICU of a tertiary, university affiliated pediatric hospital, including all children aged 19 years and younger, who underwent TPE using an AL for vascular access, between 2018 and 2023. TPE procedures were evaluated for utility (the procedure was performed as planned) and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 procedures were performed on 20 children, using ALs for inlet access and peripheral intra-venous catheters for blood return. Procedure success rate was 94%, with AL malfunction causing transient delays in 6%. All were successfully completed following AL replacement. ALs were mostly 20 and 22 gauge, predominantly located in the radial artery. AL gauge did not significantly affect flow rate or procedure duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support AL use for vascular access, as a viable alternative to the traditional large bore, double lumen catheters most often used for TPE in children. Benefits of AL use may include a decrease in sedation requirements and a lower risk of vascular complications. Further investigation is warranted, for consideration as routine practice in PICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma exchange using peripheral arterial and venous access in the pediatric intensive care unit.\",\"authors\":\"Eytan Kaplan, Avichai Weissbach, Gili Kadmon, Elhanan Nahum, Jerry Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a vital therapeutic modality in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) for various indications. Traditionally, pediatric TPE is performed via a large bore, double lumen catheter, whose insertion necessitates deep sedation, and poses risk of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Building on our previous success utilizing percutaneous radial artery catheters (ALs) for apheresis procedures, we present our experience with ALs for TPE procedures in the PICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study, conducted in the PICU of a tertiary, university affiliated pediatric hospital, including all children aged 19 years and younger, who underwent TPE using an AL for vascular access, between 2018 and 2023. TPE procedures were evaluated for utility (the procedure was performed as planned) and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 procedures were performed on 20 children, using ALs for inlet access and peripheral intra-venous catheters for blood return. Procedure success rate was 94%, with AL malfunction causing transient delays in 6%. All were successfully completed following AL replacement. ALs were mostly 20 and 22 gauge, predominantly located in the radial artery. AL gauge did not significantly affect flow rate or procedure duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support AL use for vascular access, as a viable alternative to the traditional large bore, double lumen catheters most often used for TPE in children. Benefits of AL use may include a decrease in sedation requirements and a lower risk of vascular complications. Further investigation is warranted, for consideration as routine practice in PICUs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:治疗性血浆置换(TPE)是儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的一种重要治疗方式,有多种适应症。传统上,儿科治疗性血浆置换(TPE)是通过大口径双腔导管进行的,插入时需要深度镇静,并存在出血和血栓并发症的风险。在之前成功使用经皮桡动脉导管(AL)进行无血栓手术的基础上,我们介绍了在重症监护病房使用AL进行TPE手术的经验:这是一项回顾性队列研究,在一所大学附属三级儿科医院的 PICU 中进行,包括 2018 年至 2023 年期间使用 AL 血管通路进行 TPE 手术的所有 19 岁及以下儿童。对TPE手术的实用性(手术按计划进行)和安全性进行了评估:共为20名儿童进行了72例手术,使用AL进行入口接入,使用外周静脉内导管进行血液回流。手术成功率为94%,6%的手术因AL故障造成短暂延迟。更换 AL 后,所有手术均顺利完成。AL 大多为 20 号和 22 号,主要位于桡动脉。AL规格对流速和手术时间没有明显影响:我们的研究结果支持使用AL作为血管通路,以替代儿童TPE最常用的传统大口径双腔导管。使用 AL 的好处可能包括减少镇静要求和降低血管并发症的风险。有必要进行进一步研究,并考虑将其作为 PICU 的常规做法。
Plasma exchange using peripheral arterial and venous access in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Objective: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a vital therapeutic modality in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) for various indications. Traditionally, pediatric TPE is performed via a large bore, double lumen catheter, whose insertion necessitates deep sedation, and poses risk of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Building on our previous success utilizing percutaneous radial artery catheters (ALs) for apheresis procedures, we present our experience with ALs for TPE procedures in the PICU.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study, conducted in the PICU of a tertiary, university affiliated pediatric hospital, including all children aged 19 years and younger, who underwent TPE using an AL for vascular access, between 2018 and 2023. TPE procedures were evaluated for utility (the procedure was performed as planned) and safety.
Results: A total of 72 procedures were performed on 20 children, using ALs for inlet access and peripheral intra-venous catheters for blood return. Procedure success rate was 94%, with AL malfunction causing transient delays in 6%. All were successfully completed following AL replacement. ALs were mostly 20 and 22 gauge, predominantly located in the radial artery. AL gauge did not significantly affect flow rate or procedure duration.
Conclusions: Our findings support AL use for vascular access, as a viable alternative to the traditional large bore, double lumen catheters most often used for TPE in children. Benefits of AL use may include a decrease in sedation requirements and a lower risk of vascular complications. Further investigation is warranted, for consideration as routine practice in PICUs.
期刊介绍:
TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.