在纽约市人口调查中,根据 HFSS-10 测量值验证饥饿生命体征 TM 和美国农业部食物不足工具。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1353/hpu.2024.a942868
Tanzia Shaheen, Yuqing Liu, Aldo Crossa
{"title":"在纽约市人口调查中,根据 HFSS-10 测量值验证饥饿生命体征 TM 和美国农业部食物不足工具。","authors":"Tanzia Shaheen, Yuqing Liu, Aldo Crossa","doi":"10.1353/hpu.2024.a942868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hunger Vital SignTM (HVS) and Food Insufficiency Tool (FIT) are two screeners of food insecurity that have not been extensively researched against the well-known 10-item Household Food Security Survey (HFSS-10) Module in large population settings such as New York City (NYC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the HVS compared with the HFSS-10-based food-insecurity measure and of the FIT compared with the very low food security category of the HFSS-10 using data from the June 2022 New York City Health Panel food access survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the HVS had a sensitivity of 98.1% and a specificity of 72.1%. The FIT had a sensitivity of 53.8% and a specificity of 94.5%. Specificity varied for the HVS while sensitivity varied for the FIT when stratified by sociodemographic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HVS captured people experiencing or at risk of experiencing food insecurity. The FIT underestimated the prevalence of people experiencing very low food security. These screeners may be measuring different constructs of food insecurity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","volume":"35 4S","pages":"48-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the Hunger Vital SignTM and USDA Food Insufficiency Tools Against the HFSS-10 Measure in a New York City Population Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Tanzia Shaheen, Yuqing Liu, Aldo Crossa\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hpu.2024.a942868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hunger Vital SignTM (HVS) and Food Insufficiency Tool (FIT) are two screeners of food insecurity that have not been extensively researched against the well-known 10-item Household Food Security Survey (HFSS-10) Module in large population settings such as New York City (NYC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the HVS compared with the HFSS-10-based food-insecurity measure and of the FIT compared with the very low food security category of the HFSS-10 using data from the June 2022 New York City Health Panel food access survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the HVS had a sensitivity of 98.1% and a specificity of 72.1%. The FIT had a sensitivity of 53.8% and a specificity of 94.5%. Specificity varied for the HVS while sensitivity varied for the FIT when stratified by sociodemographic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HVS captured people experiencing or at risk of experiencing food insecurity. The FIT underestimated the prevalence of people experiencing very low food security. These screeners may be measuring different constructs of food insecurity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"volume\":\"35 4S\",\"pages\":\"48-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2024.a942868\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2024.a942868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:饥饿生命体征(HVS)和食物不足工具(FIT)是食物不安全的两种筛查方法,但在纽约市(NYC)等人口众多的环境中,这两种方法尚未与众所周知的 10 项家庭食物安全调查(HFSS-10)模块进行广泛研究:我们利用 2022 年 6 月纽约市健康小组食品获取调查的数据,计算了 HVS 与基于 HFSS-10 的食品不安全衡量标准相比的灵敏度和特异性,以及 FIT 与 HFSS-10 的极低食品安全类别相比的灵敏度和特异性:总体而言,HVS 的灵敏度为 98.1%,特异性为 72.1%。FIT 的灵敏度为 53.8%,特异度为 94.5%。当按社会人口亚群进行分层时,HVS 的特异性和 FIT 的灵敏度各不相同:结论:HVS 能够捕捉到正在经历或有可能经历粮食不安全的人群。FIT低估了极度缺乏粮食安全的人群的普遍程度。这些筛查方法可能测量了不同的食物不安全结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validating the Hunger Vital SignTM and USDA Food Insufficiency Tools Against the HFSS-10 Measure in a New York City Population Survey.

Introduction: Hunger Vital SignTM (HVS) and Food Insufficiency Tool (FIT) are two screeners of food insecurity that have not been extensively researched against the well-known 10-item Household Food Security Survey (HFSS-10) Module in large population settings such as New York City (NYC).

Methods: We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the HVS compared with the HFSS-10-based food-insecurity measure and of the FIT compared with the very low food security category of the HFSS-10 using data from the June 2022 New York City Health Panel food access survey.

Results: Overall, the HVS had a sensitivity of 98.1% and a specificity of 72.1%. The FIT had a sensitivity of 53.8% and a specificity of 94.5%. Specificity varied for the HVS while sensitivity varied for the FIT when stratified by sociodemographic subgroups.

Conclusion: The HVS captured people experiencing or at risk of experiencing food insecurity. The FIT underestimated the prevalence of people experiencing very low food security. These screeners may be measuring different constructs of food insecurity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: The journal has as its goal the dissemination of information on the health of, and health care for, low income and other medically underserved communities to health care practitioners, policy makers, and community leaders who are in a position to effect meaningful change. Issues dealt with include access to, quality of, and cost of health care.
期刊最新文献
Obesity-Preventive Behaviors and Improvements in Depression among Diverse Utah Women Receiving Coaching from Community Health Workers. A Review of Disparities in Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with Limited English Proficiency: The Importance of Nursing Resources. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Access: Insights from First-Person Accounts in a Safety-Net Health Care System. Minority Health: Past, Present, and Future. "We're Trained to Survive.": Veterans' Experiences Seeking Food Assistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1