Sina Shafiezadeh, Gian Marco Duma, Marco Pozza, Alberto Testolin
{"title":"脑电图癫痫发作预测跨病种方法的系统性回顾。","authors":"Sina Shafiezadeh, Gian Marco Duma, Marco Pozza, Alberto Testolin","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad9682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Seizure prediction could greatly improve the quality of life of people suffering from epilepsy. Modern prediction systems leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques to automatically analyze neurophysiological data, most commonly the electroencephalogram (EEG), in order to anticipate upcoming epileptic events. However, the performance of these systems is normally assessed using randomized splitting methods, which can suffer from data leakage and thus result in an optimistic evaluation. In this review, we systematically surveyed the available scientific literature looking for research approaches that adopted more stringent assessment methods based on patient-independent testing. We queried three scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science), focusing on AI techniques based on non-invasive EEG recorded from human subjects. We first summarize a standardized signal processing pipeline that could be deployed for the development and testing of cross-patient seizure prediction systems. We then analyze the research work that meets our selection criteria: 21 articles adopted patient-independent validation methods, constituting only 4% of the published work in the entire field of epileptic seizure prediction. Among eligible articles, the most common approach to deal with cross-patient scenarios was based on source domain adaptation techniques, which allow to fine-tune the predictive model on a limited set of data recorded from a set of independent target patients. Overall, our review indicates that epileptic seizure prediction remains an extremely challenging problem and significant research efforts are still needed to develop automated systems that can be deployed in realistic clinical settings. Our review protocol is based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for conducting systematic reviews, considering NHLBI and ROBIS tools to mitigate the risk of bias, and it was pre-registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD4202452317).</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of cross-patient approaches for EEG epileptic seizure prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Sina Shafiezadeh, Gian Marco Duma, Marco Pozza, Alberto Testolin\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1741-2552/ad9682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Seizure prediction could greatly improve the quality of life of people suffering from epilepsy. Modern prediction systems leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques to automatically analyze neurophysiological data, most commonly the electroencephalogram (EEG), in order to anticipate upcoming epileptic events. However, the performance of these systems is normally assessed using randomized splitting methods, which can suffer from data leakage and thus result in an optimistic evaluation. In this review, we systematically surveyed the available scientific literature looking for research approaches that adopted more stringent assessment methods based on patient-independent testing. We queried three scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science), focusing on AI techniques based on non-invasive EEG recorded from human subjects. We first summarize a standardized signal processing pipeline that could be deployed for the development and testing of cross-patient seizure prediction systems. We then analyze the research work that meets our selection criteria: 21 articles adopted patient-independent validation methods, constituting only 4% of the published work in the entire field of epileptic seizure prediction. Among eligible articles, the most common approach to deal with cross-patient scenarios was based on source domain adaptation techniques, which allow to fine-tune the predictive model on a limited set of data recorded from a set of independent target patients. Overall, our review indicates that epileptic seizure prediction remains an extremely challenging problem and significant research efforts are still needed to develop automated systems that can be deployed in realistic clinical settings. Our review protocol is based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for conducting systematic reviews, considering NHLBI and ROBIS tools to mitigate the risk of bias, and it was pre-registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD4202452317).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad9682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad9682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
癫痫发作预测可以大大提高癫痫患者的生活质量。现代预测系统利用人工智能(AI)技术自动分析神经生理学数据,最常见的是脑电图(EEG),以预测即将发生的癫痫事件。然而,这些系统的性能通常采用随机分割法进行评估,这种方法可能会出现数据泄露,从而导致评估结果过于乐观。在这篇综述中,我们系统地调查了现有的科学文献,寻找基于独立于患者的测试采用更严格评估方法的研究方法。我们查询了三个科学数据库(PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science),重点研究了基于人体无创脑电图记录的人工智能技术。我们首先总结了可用于开发和测试跨患者癫痫发作预测系统的标准化信号处理管道。然后,我们分析了符合我们选择标准的研究工作:21篇文章采用了独立于患者的验证方法,仅占整个癫痫发作预测领域已发表文章的4%。在符合条件的文章中,处理跨患者情况最常见的方法是基于源域适应技术,这种技术可以在一组独立目标患者记录的有限数据集上对预测模型进行微调。总之,我们的综述表明,癫痫发作预测仍然是一个极具挑战性的问题,要想开发出可在现实临床环境中部署的自动化系统,仍需进行大量的研究工作。我们的综述方案基于PRISMA 2020指南进行系统性综述,考虑了NHLBI和ROBIS工具以降低偏倚风险,并在PROSPERO进行了预注册(注册号:CRD4202452317)。
A systematic review of cross-patient approaches for EEG epileptic seizure prediction.
Seizure prediction could greatly improve the quality of life of people suffering from epilepsy. Modern prediction systems leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques to automatically analyze neurophysiological data, most commonly the electroencephalogram (EEG), in order to anticipate upcoming epileptic events. However, the performance of these systems is normally assessed using randomized splitting methods, which can suffer from data leakage and thus result in an optimistic evaluation. In this review, we systematically surveyed the available scientific literature looking for research approaches that adopted more stringent assessment methods based on patient-independent testing. We queried three scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science), focusing on AI techniques based on non-invasive EEG recorded from human subjects. We first summarize a standardized signal processing pipeline that could be deployed for the development and testing of cross-patient seizure prediction systems. We then analyze the research work that meets our selection criteria: 21 articles adopted patient-independent validation methods, constituting only 4% of the published work in the entire field of epileptic seizure prediction. Among eligible articles, the most common approach to deal with cross-patient scenarios was based on source domain adaptation techniques, which allow to fine-tune the predictive model on a limited set of data recorded from a set of independent target patients. Overall, our review indicates that epileptic seizure prediction remains an extremely challenging problem and significant research efforts are still needed to develop automated systems that can be deployed in realistic clinical settings. Our review protocol is based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for conducting systematic reviews, considering NHLBI and ROBIS tools to mitigate the risk of bias, and it was pre-registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD4202452317).