{"title":"探索 EFL 学习者对 ChatGPT 文本修订的整合与感知:三阶段写作任务研究","authors":"Lifang Bai;Yijia Wei","doi":"10.1109/TLT.2024.3491864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ChatGPT can promptly reformulate a text and improve its quality in content and form while preserving the original meaning. Yet, little is known about how learners respond to such reformulations. Here, we employed a three-stage writing task (composing-comparison-rewriting) to investigate how learners notice, integrate, and perceive ChatGPT's reformulations as feedback in English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom context. We collected learners’ written notes made during the comparison of their original texts and the reformulations, categorizing them based on the language-related type of noticing (vocabulary, discourse, and form) and quality of noticing (depth of processing: low, intermediate, and high). We also analyzed the instances of reformulations integrated into learners’ rewriting and their answers to a questionnaire. The results showed that: 1) the reformulations directed learners’ attention to the gaps in their original writing, especially in word choice, and prompted them to integrate ChatGPT-generated changes in their rewriting; 2) the number of instances integrated into the rewriting was directly related to the quantity, type, and quality of noticing in the comparison stage; and 3) learners generally appreciated the pedagogical value of ChatGPT in EFL writing, particularly during the revision stage, although they believe occasionally ChatGPT might misinterpret their intentions. The study suggests that ChatGPT's reformulations should be complemented with peer and teacher feedback to create a comprehensive and personalized learning environment.","PeriodicalId":49191,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","volume":"17 ","pages":"2215-2226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring EFL Learners’ Integration and Perceptions of ChatGPT's Text Revisions: A Three-Stage Writing Task Study\",\"authors\":\"Lifang Bai;Yijia Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TLT.2024.3491864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ChatGPT can promptly reformulate a text and improve its quality in content and form while preserving the original meaning. Yet, little is known about how learners respond to such reformulations. Here, we employed a three-stage writing task (composing-comparison-rewriting) to investigate how learners notice, integrate, and perceive ChatGPT's reformulations as feedback in English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom context. We collected learners’ written notes made during the comparison of their original texts and the reformulations, categorizing them based on the language-related type of noticing (vocabulary, discourse, and form) and quality of noticing (depth of processing: low, intermediate, and high). We also analyzed the instances of reformulations integrated into learners’ rewriting and their answers to a questionnaire. The results showed that: 1) the reformulations directed learners’ attention to the gaps in their original writing, especially in word choice, and prompted them to integrate ChatGPT-generated changes in their rewriting; 2) the number of instances integrated into the rewriting was directly related to the quantity, type, and quality of noticing in the comparison stage; and 3) learners generally appreciated the pedagogical value of ChatGPT in EFL writing, particularly during the revision stage, although they believe occasionally ChatGPT might misinterpret their intentions. The study suggests that ChatGPT's reformulations should be complemented with peer and teacher feedback to create a comprehensive and personalized learning environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"2215-2226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10745732/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10745732/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring EFL Learners’ Integration and Perceptions of ChatGPT's Text Revisions: A Three-Stage Writing Task Study
ChatGPT can promptly reformulate a text and improve its quality in content and form while preserving the original meaning. Yet, little is known about how learners respond to such reformulations. Here, we employed a three-stage writing task (composing-comparison-rewriting) to investigate how learners notice, integrate, and perceive ChatGPT's reformulations as feedback in English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom context. We collected learners’ written notes made during the comparison of their original texts and the reformulations, categorizing them based on the language-related type of noticing (vocabulary, discourse, and form) and quality of noticing (depth of processing: low, intermediate, and high). We also analyzed the instances of reformulations integrated into learners’ rewriting and their answers to a questionnaire. The results showed that: 1) the reformulations directed learners’ attention to the gaps in their original writing, especially in word choice, and prompted them to integrate ChatGPT-generated changes in their rewriting; 2) the number of instances integrated into the rewriting was directly related to the quantity, type, and quality of noticing in the comparison stage; and 3) learners generally appreciated the pedagogical value of ChatGPT in EFL writing, particularly during the revision stage, although they believe occasionally ChatGPT might misinterpret their intentions. The study suggests that ChatGPT's reformulations should be complemented with peer and teacher feedback to create a comprehensive and personalized learning environment.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies covers all advances in learning technologies and their applications, including but not limited to the following topics: innovative online learning systems; intelligent tutors; educational games; simulation systems for education and training; collaborative learning tools; learning with mobile devices; wearable devices and interfaces for learning; personalized and adaptive learning systems; tools for formative and summative assessment; tools for learning analytics and educational data mining; ontologies for learning systems; standards and web services that support learning; authoring tools for learning materials; computer support for peer tutoring; learning via computer-mediated inquiry, field, and lab work; social learning techniques; social networks and infrastructures for learning and knowledge sharing; and creation and management of learning objects.