利用系统平面灵敏度计算单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描定量值时,模型制作误差的影响。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1088/2057-1976/ad91bc
Yuta Nojima, Yoshihiro Yamazaki
{"title":"利用系统平面灵敏度计算单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描定量值时,模型制作误差的影响。","authors":"Yuta Nojima, Yoshihiro Yamazaki","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ad91bc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to clarify the effect of the accuracy of phantom-making on quantification accuracy in the measurement of system planar sensitivity using a disc source. We measured the system planar sensitivity using the method recommended by the equipment manufacturer. A container of<sup>99m</sup>Tc solution was placed at a height of 10 cm from the surface of the collimator using styrofoam. The system planar sensitivity was the average of the values obtained from the two detectors, the measurements were taken thrice. The system planar sensitivity values obtained when the disc source size (5.0, 14.5 and 20 cm), solution volume (50, 100 and 150 ml) and radioactivity (nine points between 36 MBq and 505 MBq) changed were used to evaluate the quantification accuracy. The relative error for the 5.0 cm source significantly exceeded for the other source sizes (p < 0.05); however, no statistically significant difference was observed between the 14.5 cm and 20.0 cm sources. The smaller the solution volume, the smaller the relative error and the higher the quantification accuracy. The quantification accuracy increased as radioactivity decreased. The relative error was lowest at 36 MBq and highest at 505 MBq, with a difference of approximately 10%. Quantification accuracy improved as the size of the surface source exceeded 14.5 cm and the amount of solution decreased. Radioactivity at the time of measurement significantly affected quantification accuracy and 73-103 MBq of radioactivity was sufficient for repeatable and quantification accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of phantom-making error in the calculation of quantitative values of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography using system planar sensitivity.\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Nojima, Yoshihiro Yamazaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2057-1976/ad91bc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to clarify the effect of the accuracy of phantom-making on quantification accuracy in the measurement of system planar sensitivity using a disc source. We measured the system planar sensitivity using the method recommended by the equipment manufacturer. A container of<sup>99m</sup>Tc solution was placed at a height of 10 cm from the surface of the collimator using styrofoam. The system planar sensitivity was the average of the values obtained from the two detectors, the measurements were taken thrice. The system planar sensitivity values obtained when the disc source size (5.0, 14.5 and 20 cm), solution volume (50, 100 and 150 ml) and radioactivity (nine points between 36 MBq and 505 MBq) changed were used to evaluate the quantification accuracy. The relative error for the 5.0 cm source significantly exceeded for the other source sizes (p < 0.05); however, no statistically significant difference was observed between the 14.5 cm and 20.0 cm sources. The smaller the solution volume, the smaller the relative error and the higher the quantification accuracy. The quantification accuracy increased as radioactivity decreased. The relative error was lowest at 36 MBq and highest at 505 MBq, with a difference of approximately 10%. Quantification accuracy improved as the size of the surface source exceeded 14.5 cm and the amount of solution decreased. Radioactivity at the time of measurement significantly affected quantification accuracy and 73-103 MBq of radioactivity was sufficient for repeatable and quantification accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad91bc\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad91bc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在阐明在使用圆盘光源测量系统平面灵敏度时,制作模型的准确性对量化准确性的影响。我们使用设备制造商推荐的方法测量了系统平面灵敏度。使用泡沫塑料将一个装有 99mTc 溶液的容器放置在距离准直器表面 10 厘米的高度。系统平面灵敏度是两个探测器所得数值的平均值,测量三次。当圆盘源尺寸(5.0、14.5 和 20 厘米)、溶液体积(50、100 和 150 毫升)和放射性(36 MBq 至 505 MBq 之间的九个点)发生变化时获得的系统平面灵敏度值用于评估量化精度。5.0 厘米放射源的相对误差明显超过其他尺寸的放射源(p < 0.05);但 14.5 厘米和 20.0 厘米放射源之间没有明显的统计学差异。溶液体积越小,相对误差越小,定量准确度越高。随着放射性的降低,定量准确度也随之提高。相对误差在 36 MBq 时最小,在 505 MBq 时最大,相差约 10%。随着表面源的尺寸超过 14.5 厘米和溶液量减少,定量准确度也会提高。测量时的放射性对定量准确性有很大影响,73-103 MBq 的放射性足以保证可重复性和定量准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of phantom-making error in the calculation of quantitative values of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography using system planar sensitivity.

This study aimed to clarify the effect of the accuracy of phantom-making on quantification accuracy in the measurement of system planar sensitivity using a disc source. We measured the system planar sensitivity using the method recommended by the equipment manufacturer. A container of99mTc solution was placed at a height of 10 cm from the surface of the collimator using styrofoam. The system planar sensitivity was the average of the values obtained from the two detectors, the measurements were taken thrice. The system planar sensitivity values obtained when the disc source size (5.0, 14.5 and 20 cm), solution volume (50, 100 and 150 ml) and radioactivity (nine points between 36 MBq and 505 MBq) changed were used to evaluate the quantification accuracy. The relative error for the 5.0 cm source significantly exceeded for the other source sizes (p < 0.05); however, no statistically significant difference was observed between the 14.5 cm and 20.0 cm sources. The smaller the solution volume, the smaller the relative error and the higher the quantification accuracy. The quantification accuracy increased as radioactivity decreased. The relative error was lowest at 36 MBq and highest at 505 MBq, with a difference of approximately 10%. Quantification accuracy improved as the size of the surface source exceeded 14.5 cm and the amount of solution decreased. Radioactivity at the time of measurement significantly affected quantification accuracy and 73-103 MBq of radioactivity was sufficient for repeatable and quantification accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
期刊最新文献
Experimental and GEANT4 Simulated FEPE of NaI(Tl) Detector for Linear Sources. Full fine-tuning strategy for endoscopic foundation models with expanded learnable offset parameters. Investigation on the Heating Effects of Intra-Tumoral Injectable Magnetic hydrogels (IT-MG) for Cancer Hyperthermia. Magnetic vector field mapping of the stimulated abductor digiti minimi muscle with optically pumped magnetometers. Optimizing Transformer-Based Network via Advanced Decoder Design for Medical Image Segmentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1