Elizabeth Casline, Susan Douglas, Maartje van Sonsbeek, Kelsie Okamura, Amanda Jensen-Doss
{"title":"将基于测量的护理作为检测和预防青少年心理治疗伤害的工具。","authors":"Elizabeth Casline, Susan Douglas, Maartje van Sonsbeek, Kelsie Okamura, Amanda Jensen-Doss","doi":"10.1007/s10802-024-01262-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement-based care (MBC), the use of routine assessment to guide clinical decision-making, has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of mental health services for youth by improving the detection and prevention of harm. Concerns exist, however, that widespread efforts to implement MBC may have a negative impact on youth mental health care. We explore both perspectives by describing how MBC can be leveraged as a tool to detect and prevent harmful treatment in youth and how misapplication of MBC also has the potential to cause harm. This discussion focuses on how MBC can help therapists identify harm caused by ineffective practices (i.e., deterioration or no symptoms changes), poor client engagement (e.g., early drop-out, poor alliance), and adverse events (e.g., injury caused by treatment). We also discuss multi-level applications of aggregated MBC data to prevent harm through workforce development and organizational and health systems quality and cost of care improvement initiatives. Misapplication of MBC by failing to adhere to MBC best practices, overreliance on data above clinical judgement, providing insufficient organizational support, and using MBC data to justify cost containment are all discussed as possible sources of harm. We conclude with a discussion of future directions for research needed to advance the application of MBC to the prevention of harm in youth psychotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement-Based Care as a Tool to Detect and Prevent Harm in Youth Psychotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Casline, Susan Douglas, Maartje van Sonsbeek, Kelsie Okamura, Amanda Jensen-Doss\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10802-024-01262-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measurement-based care (MBC), the use of routine assessment to guide clinical decision-making, has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of mental health services for youth by improving the detection and prevention of harm. Concerns exist, however, that widespread efforts to implement MBC may have a negative impact on youth mental health care. We explore both perspectives by describing how MBC can be leveraged as a tool to detect and prevent harmful treatment in youth and how misapplication of MBC also has the potential to cause harm. This discussion focuses on how MBC can help therapists identify harm caused by ineffective practices (i.e., deterioration or no symptoms changes), poor client engagement (e.g., early drop-out, poor alliance), and adverse events (e.g., injury caused by treatment). We also discuss multi-level applications of aggregated MBC data to prevent harm through workforce development and organizational and health systems quality and cost of care improvement initiatives. Misapplication of MBC by failing to adhere to MBC best practices, overreliance on data above clinical judgement, providing insufficient organizational support, and using MBC data to justify cost containment are all discussed as possible sources of harm. We conclude with a discussion of future directions for research needed to advance the application of MBC to the prevention of harm in youth psychotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01262-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01262-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以测量为基础的护理(MBC),即使用常规评估来指导临床决策,通过改善对伤害的检测和预防,有可能显著提高青少年心理健康服务的质量。然而,也有人担心,广泛推行 MBC 可能会对青少年心理健康护理产生负面影响。我们探讨了这两种观点,描述了如何利用 MBC 作为一种工具来检测和预防对青少年的有害治疗,以及错误应用 MBC 如何也有可能造成伤害。讨论的重点是 MBC 如何帮助治疗师识别无效治疗(即症状恶化或无症状变化)、客户参与度低(如早期辍学、联盟关系差)和不良事件(如治疗造成的伤害)所造成的伤害。我们还讨论了多层次应用 MBC 综合数据的问题,以通过劳动力发展、组织和医疗系统质量及护理成本改进措施来预防伤害。不遵守 MBC 最佳实践、过度依赖数据而非临床判断、提供的组织支持不足,以及利用 MBC 数据为成本控制辩护,这些都是 MBC 的误用,也是可能的伤害来源。最后,我们还讨论了未来的研究方向,以推动在青少年心理治疗中应用 MBC 预防伤害。
Measurement-Based Care as a Tool to Detect and Prevent Harm in Youth Psychotherapy.
Measurement-based care (MBC), the use of routine assessment to guide clinical decision-making, has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of mental health services for youth by improving the detection and prevention of harm. Concerns exist, however, that widespread efforts to implement MBC may have a negative impact on youth mental health care. We explore both perspectives by describing how MBC can be leveraged as a tool to detect and prevent harmful treatment in youth and how misapplication of MBC also has the potential to cause harm. This discussion focuses on how MBC can help therapists identify harm caused by ineffective practices (i.e., deterioration or no symptoms changes), poor client engagement (e.g., early drop-out, poor alliance), and adverse events (e.g., injury caused by treatment). We also discuss multi-level applications of aggregated MBC data to prevent harm through workforce development and organizational and health systems quality and cost of care improvement initiatives. Misapplication of MBC by failing to adhere to MBC best practices, overreliance on data above clinical judgement, providing insufficient organizational support, and using MBC data to justify cost containment are all discussed as possible sources of harm. We conclude with a discussion of future directions for research needed to advance the application of MBC to the prevention of harm in youth psychotherapy.