用音节进行二分听:强迫注意力的影响

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Laterality Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2024.2430964
Incé A Husain, Kayla A Millar, Daniel Voyer
{"title":"用音节进行二分听:强迫注意力的影响","authors":"Incé A Husain, Kayla A Millar, Daniel Voyer","doi":"10.1080/1357650X.2024.2430964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares results from three dichotic listening experiments involving different methods of attention control. In each experiment, participants completed a dichotic listening task requiring two responses to syllables and we noted the order of report for the responses. In Experiment 1, participants reported from a specific ear first in trial blocks. In Experiment 2, an arrow cue indicated the ear of first report. In Experiment 3, a tone was presented to the ear of first report. Free recall in which participants reported the two syllables in any order was also included as a baseline. Results indicated a tendency to report from the right ear first in free recall, producing more reports from that ear, reflecting a right ear advantage (REA). In all cueing conditions, an overall REA emerged but it shifted to a left ear advantage (LEA: more reports from the left ear) when the left ear was cued. Additionally, larger laterality scores ([Right - Left]/[Right + Left]) for the conditions where the right ear was cued, relative to where the left ear was cued, suggests that attention control is limited in overriding the structural auditory asymmetries. We discuss the implications of these results for models of dichotic listening.</p>","PeriodicalId":47387,"journal":{"name":"Laterality","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dichotic listening with syllables: Effects of forced attention.\",\"authors\":\"Incé A Husain, Kayla A Millar, Daniel Voyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1357650X.2024.2430964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compares results from three dichotic listening experiments involving different methods of attention control. In each experiment, participants completed a dichotic listening task requiring two responses to syllables and we noted the order of report for the responses. In Experiment 1, participants reported from a specific ear first in trial blocks. In Experiment 2, an arrow cue indicated the ear of first report. In Experiment 3, a tone was presented to the ear of first report. Free recall in which participants reported the two syllables in any order was also included as a baseline. Results indicated a tendency to report from the right ear first in free recall, producing more reports from that ear, reflecting a right ear advantage (REA). In all cueing conditions, an overall REA emerged but it shifted to a left ear advantage (LEA: more reports from the left ear) when the left ear was cued. Additionally, larger laterality scores ([Right - Left]/[Right + Left]) for the conditions where the right ear was cued, relative to where the left ear was cued, suggests that attention control is limited in overriding the structural auditory asymmetries. We discuss the implications of these results for models of dichotic listening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laterality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laterality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2024.2430964\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laterality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2024.2430964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了涉及不同注意力控制方法的三项二分法听力实验的结果。在每个实验中,参与者都要完成一项要求对音节做出两种反应的二分听任务,我们注意到了反应的报告顺序。在实验 1 中,受试者在试听区块中首先从特定的耳朵做出反应。在实验 2 中,一个箭头提示指出了最先报告的耳朵。在实验 3 中,首先报告的耳朵会听到一个音调。作为基线,还包括自由回忆,即参与者以任何顺序报告两个音节。结果表明,在自由回忆中,受试者倾向于先用右耳报告,从而产生更多的右耳报告,这反映了右耳优势(REA)。在所有提示条件下,总体上都出现了右耳优势(REA),但当左耳受到提示时,则转变为左耳优势(LEA:左耳报告更多)。此外,相对于左耳提示,右耳提示条件下的侧向得分([右 - 左]/[右 + 左])更大,这表明注意力控制在克服听觉结构不对称方面是有限的。我们将讨论这些结果对二分听模型的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dichotic listening with syllables: Effects of forced attention.

This study compares results from three dichotic listening experiments involving different methods of attention control. In each experiment, participants completed a dichotic listening task requiring two responses to syllables and we noted the order of report for the responses. In Experiment 1, participants reported from a specific ear first in trial blocks. In Experiment 2, an arrow cue indicated the ear of first report. In Experiment 3, a tone was presented to the ear of first report. Free recall in which participants reported the two syllables in any order was also included as a baseline. Results indicated a tendency to report from the right ear first in free recall, producing more reports from that ear, reflecting a right ear advantage (REA). In all cueing conditions, an overall REA emerged but it shifted to a left ear advantage (LEA: more reports from the left ear) when the left ear was cued. Additionally, larger laterality scores ([Right - Left]/[Right + Left]) for the conditions where the right ear was cued, relative to where the left ear was cued, suggests that attention control is limited in overriding the structural auditory asymmetries. We discuss the implications of these results for models of dichotic listening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laterality
Laterality Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.
期刊最新文献
Dichotic listening with syllables: Effects of forced attention. Do bodybuilders pose symmetrically? Lateral bias analysis in mandatory poses of Mr. Olympia Classic Physique athletes. Artistic turns: laterality in paintings of kisses and embraces Footedness in merlins: Raptors perching in a cold climate. Fear is more right lateralized than happiness and anger: Evidence for the motivational hypothesis of emotional face perception?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1