IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05174-w
Mihai-Gabriel Alexandru, Patrick Niewald, Stefan Krüger, Rainer Borgstedt, Tony Whitehouse, Mervyn Singer, Sebastian Rehberg, Sean S. Scholz
{"title":"Mortality in septic patients treated with short-acting betablockers: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Mihai-Gabriel Alexandru, Patrick Niewald, Stefan Krüger, Rainer Borgstedt, Tony Whitehouse, Mervyn Singer, Sebastian Rehberg, Sean S. Scholz","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05174-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment with short-acting betablockers in septic patients remains controversial. Two recent large multicenter trials have provided additional evidence on this therapeutic approach. We thus performed a meta-analysis, including the most recent data, to evaluate the potential impacts of treatment with short-acting betablockers on mortality in adult septic patients. The data search included PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis of all eligible peer-reviewed studies was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Only randomized, controlled studies with valid classifications of sepsis and intravenous treatment with short-acting betablockers (landiolol or esmolol) were included. Short-term mortality served as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included effects on short-term mortality regarding patient age and cardiac rhythm. A total of seven studies summarizing 854 patients fulfilled the predefined criteria and were included. Short-term mortality as well as pooled mortality (longest period of data on mortality) was not significantly impacted by treatment with short-acting betablockers when compared to the reference treatment (Risk difference, − 0.10 [95% CI, − 0.22 to 0.02]; p = 0.11; p for Cochran’s Q test = 0.001; I2 = 73%). No difference was seen when comparing patients aged < 65 versus ≥ 65 years (p = 0.11) or sinus tachycardia with atrial fibrillation (p = 0.27). Despite statistical heterogeneity, no significant publication bias was observed. Administration of short-acting betablockers did not reduce short-term mortality in septic patients with persistent tachycardia. Future studies should also provide extensive hemodynamic data to enable characterization of cardiac function before and during treatment.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"257 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05174-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症患者使用短效受体阻滞剂治疗仍存在争议。最近的两项大型多中心试验为这种治疗方法提供了更多证据。因此,我们进行了一项包括最新数据在内的荟萃分析,以评估使用短效倍他受体阻滞剂治疗对成人脓毒症患者死亡率的潜在影响。数据搜索包括 PubMed、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane 图书馆。根据 PRISMA 声明,对所有符合条件的同行评审研究进行了荟萃分析。仅纳入了对脓毒症进行有效分类并使用短效受体阻滞剂(兰迪洛尔或艾司洛尔)进行静脉治疗的随机对照研究。短期死亡率为主要终点。次要终点包括患者年龄和心律对短期死亡率的影响。共有七项研究的 854 名患者符合预定标准并被纳入研究。与参考治疗相比,短效受体阻滞剂治疗对短期死亡率和集合死亡率(死亡率数据的最长时间段)没有显著影响(风险差异,- 0.10 [95% CI,- 0.22 至 0.02];P = 0.11;Cochran's Q 检验的 P = 0.001;I2 = 73%)。在比较年龄小于 65 岁与≥ 65 岁的患者(p = 0.11)或窦性心动过速与心房颤动的患者(p = 0.27)时,未发现差异。尽管存在统计学异质性,但未发现明显的发表偏倚。使用短效受体阻滞剂并不能降低持续性心动过速脓毒症患者的短期死亡率。未来的研究还应提供广泛的血液动力学数据,以确定治疗前和治疗期间心脏功能的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mortality in septic patients treated with short-acting betablockers: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Treatment with short-acting betablockers in septic patients remains controversial. Two recent large multicenter trials have provided additional evidence on this therapeutic approach. We thus performed a meta-analysis, including the most recent data, to evaluate the potential impacts of treatment with short-acting betablockers on mortality in adult septic patients. The data search included PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis of all eligible peer-reviewed studies was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Only randomized, controlled studies with valid classifications of sepsis and intravenous treatment with short-acting betablockers (landiolol or esmolol) were included. Short-term mortality served as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included effects on short-term mortality regarding patient age and cardiac rhythm. A total of seven studies summarizing 854 patients fulfilled the predefined criteria and were included. Short-term mortality as well as pooled mortality (longest period of data on mortality) was not significantly impacted by treatment with short-acting betablockers when compared to the reference treatment (Risk difference, − 0.10 [95% CI, − 0.22 to 0.02]; p = 0.11; p for Cochran’s Q test = 0.001; I2 = 73%). No difference was seen when comparing patients aged < 65 versus ≥ 65 years (p = 0.11) or sinus tachycardia with atrial fibrillation (p = 0.27). Despite statistical heterogeneity, no significant publication bias was observed. Administration of short-acting betablockers did not reduce short-term mortality in septic patients with persistent tachycardia. Future studies should also provide extensive hemodynamic data to enable characterization of cardiac function before and during treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Mortality in septic patients treated with short-acting betablockers: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Weaning of non COPD patients at high-risk of extubation failure assessed by lung ultrasound: the WIN IN WEAN multicentre randomised controlled trial The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone-system in sepsis and its clinical modulation with exogenous angiotensin II Time-dependent intervention in the database study examining the efficacy of whole blood transfusion in traumatic patients Cost-effectiveness of high flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1