{"title":"通过仪器模型试验研究边缘红土回填的复合土工合成材料加固土墙的水力学行为","authors":"K.A. Dhanya, P.V. Divya","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To examine the hydro-mechanical behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls (GRSW) backfilled with locally available marginal lateritic soils, physical model tests were conducted during construction, surcharge loading, and rainfall infiltration. Various reinforcements were tested, including a conventional geogrid (GG) and two types of composite geosynthetic reinforcements (CGR) with equivalent stiffness but different configurations. The results showed that suction was maintained throughout surcharging, but during rainfall infiltration, the GG model lost suction after 12,240 min, while both CGRs retained it. Strain evaluations indicated that all reinforcements remained within serviceability limits during surcharging, but the GG model exceeded these limits during rainfall, while the CGRs stayed within acceptable limits with minimal strain increases. Additionally, the GG model showed a 61% increase in facing deformation during rainfall, exceeding serviceability limits, whereas the CGRs remained within permissible limits. The study emphasizes the importance of cautious use of marginal soils in backfill applications. These soils can still be suitable for GRSW when reinforced with composite geosynthetics, especially CGR made of polyester geogrids with non-woven geotextile bonded longitudinally to the polyester strips. This configuration demonstrated superior performance by reducing facing deformation through better drainage and improved soil-reinforcement interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 1","pages":"Pages 474-495"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydro-mechanical behaviour of composite-geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with marginal lateritic backfills through instrumented model tests\",\"authors\":\"K.A. Dhanya, P.V. Divya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To examine the hydro-mechanical behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls (GRSW) backfilled with locally available marginal lateritic soils, physical model tests were conducted during construction, surcharge loading, and rainfall infiltration. Various reinforcements were tested, including a conventional geogrid (GG) and two types of composite geosynthetic reinforcements (CGR) with equivalent stiffness but different configurations. The results showed that suction was maintained throughout surcharging, but during rainfall infiltration, the GG model lost suction after 12,240 min, while both CGRs retained it. Strain evaluations indicated that all reinforcements remained within serviceability limits during surcharging, but the GG model exceeded these limits during rainfall, while the CGRs stayed within acceptable limits with minimal strain increases. Additionally, the GG model showed a 61% increase in facing deformation during rainfall, exceeding serviceability limits, whereas the CGRs remained within permissible limits. The study emphasizes the importance of cautious use of marginal soils in backfill applications. These soils can still be suitable for GRSW when reinforced with composite geosynthetics, especially CGR made of polyester geogrids with non-woven geotextile bonded longitudinally to the polyester strips. This configuration demonstrated superior performance by reducing facing deformation through better drainage and improved soil-reinforcement interaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 474-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424001328\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424001328","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hydro-mechanical behaviour of composite-geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with marginal lateritic backfills through instrumented model tests
To examine the hydro-mechanical behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls (GRSW) backfilled with locally available marginal lateritic soils, physical model tests were conducted during construction, surcharge loading, and rainfall infiltration. Various reinforcements were tested, including a conventional geogrid (GG) and two types of composite geosynthetic reinforcements (CGR) with equivalent stiffness but different configurations. The results showed that suction was maintained throughout surcharging, but during rainfall infiltration, the GG model lost suction after 12,240 min, while both CGRs retained it. Strain evaluations indicated that all reinforcements remained within serviceability limits during surcharging, but the GG model exceeded these limits during rainfall, while the CGRs stayed within acceptable limits with minimal strain increases. Additionally, the GG model showed a 61% increase in facing deformation during rainfall, exceeding serviceability limits, whereas the CGRs remained within permissible limits. The study emphasizes the importance of cautious use of marginal soils in backfill applications. These soils can still be suitable for GRSW when reinforced with composite geosynthetics, especially CGR made of polyester geogrids with non-woven geotextile bonded longitudinally to the polyester strips. This configuration demonstrated superior performance by reducing facing deformation through better drainage and improved soil-reinforcement interaction.
期刊介绍:
The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.