{"title":"非空成对交叉族","authors":"Yang Huang, Yuejian Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.jcta.2024.105981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Two families <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>B</mi></math></span> are cross-intersecting if <span><math><mi>A</mi><mo>∩</mo><mi>B</mi><mo>≠</mo><mo>∅</mo></math></span> for any <span><math><mi>A</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>B</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>B</mi></math></span>. We call <em>t</em> families <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> pairwise cross-intersecting families if <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> are cross-intersecting for <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>≤</mo><mi>i</mi><mo><</mo><mi>j</mi><mo>≤</mo><mi>t</mi></math></span>. Additionally, if <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>≠</mo><mo>∅</mo></math></span> for each <span><math><mi>j</mi><mo>∈</mo><mo>[</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>]</mo></math></span>, then we say that <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> are non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting. Let <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>⊆</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mo>[</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>⊆</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mo>[</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub><mo>⊆</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mo>[</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> be non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families with <span><math><mi>t</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>2</mn></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≥</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≥</mo><mo>⋯</mo><mo>≥</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><mi>n</mi><mo>≥</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> be positive numbers. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound of <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mo>∑</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msubsup><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo></math></span> and characterize the families <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> attaining the upper bound. Our results unifies results of Frankl and Tokushige (1992) <span><span>[5]</span></span>, Shi, Frankl and Qian (2022) <span><span>[15]</span></span>, Huang, Peng and Wang <span><span>[10]</span></span>, and Zhang and Feng <span><span>[16]</span></span>. Furthermore, our result can be applied in the treatment for some <span><math><mi>n</mi><mo><</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> while all previous known results do not have such an application. In the proof, a result of Kruskal and Katona is applied to allow us to consider only families <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> whose elements are the first <span><math><mo>|</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo></math></span> elements in lexicographic order. We bound <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mo>∑</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msubsup><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo></math></span> by a single variable function <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>R</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>, where <em>R</em> is the last element of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> in lexicographic order, and verify that <span><math><mo>−</mo><msub><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>R</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> has unimodality which is stronger than the extremal result. We think that the unimodality of functions in this paper is interesting in its own, in addition to the extremal result.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 105981"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families\",\"authors\":\"Yang Huang, Yuejian Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcta.2024.105981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Two families <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>B</mi></math></span> are cross-intersecting if <span><math><mi>A</mi><mo>∩</mo><mi>B</mi><mo>≠</mo><mo>∅</mo></math></span> for any <span><math><mi>A</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>B</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>B</mi></math></span>. We call <em>t</em> families <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> pairwise cross-intersecting families if <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> are cross-intersecting for <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>≤</mo><mi>i</mi><mo><</mo><mi>j</mi><mo>≤</mo><mi>t</mi></math></span>. Additionally, if <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>≠</mo><mo>∅</mo></math></span> for each <span><math><mi>j</mi><mo>∈</mo><mo>[</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>]</mo></math></span>, then we say that <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> are non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting. Let <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>⊆</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mo>[</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>⊆</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mo>[</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub><mo>⊆</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mo>[</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> be non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families with <span><math><mi>t</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>2</mn></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≥</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≥</mo><mo>⋯</mo><mo>≥</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, <span><math><mi>n</mi><mo>≥</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> be positive numbers. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound of <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mo>∑</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msubsup><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo></math></span> and characterize the families <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><mo>…</mo><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> attaining the upper bound. Our results unifies results of Frankl and Tokushige (1992) <span><span>[5]</span></span>, Shi, Frankl and Qian (2022) <span><span>[15]</span></span>, Huang, Peng and Wang <span><span>[10]</span></span>, and Zhang and Feng <span><span>[16]</span></span>. Furthermore, our result can be applied in the treatment for some <span><math><mi>n</mi><mo><</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> while all previous known results do not have such an application. In the proof, a result of Kruskal and Katona is applied to allow us to consider only families <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> whose elements are the first <span><math><mo>|</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo></math></span> elements in lexicographic order. We bound <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mo>∑</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msubsup><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>|</mo></math></span> by a single variable function <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>R</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>, where <em>R</em> is the last element of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> in lexicographic order, and verify that <span><math><mo>−</mo><msub><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><mi>R</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> has unimodality which is stronger than the extremal result. We think that the unimodality of functions in this paper is interesting in its own, in addition to the extremal result.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A\",\"volume\":\"211 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105981\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097316524001201\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097316524001201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
如果对于任意的 A∈A 和 B∈B 来说,A∩B≠∅Sm_2205↩,则两个族 A 和 B 是相交的。如果 Ai 和 Aj 在 1≤i<j≤t 时交叉,我们称 t 个族为 A1,A2,...,At 成对交叉族。此外,如果对于每个 j∈[t] Aj≠∅,那么我们说 A1,A2,...At 是非空的成对相交族。设 A1⊆([n]k1),A2⊆([n]k2),...,At⊆([n]kt)为非空成对相交族,t≥2,k1≥k2≥⋯≥kt,n≥k1+k2,d1,d2,...,dt 为正数。本文给出了∑j=1tdj|Aj|的尖锐上界,并描述了达到上界的族 A1,A2,...At 的特征。我们的结果统一了 Frankl 和 Tokushige (1992) [5]、Shi、Frankl 和 Qian (2022) [15]、Huang、Peng 和 Wang [10] 以及 Zhang 和 Feng [16] 的结果。此外,我们的结果可以应用于对某些 n<k1+k2 的处理,而之前已知的所有结果都没有这样的应用。在证明过程中,我们应用了 Kruskal 和 Katona 的一个结果,使我们只考虑其元素是按词典顺序排列的第一个 |Ai| 元素的 Ai 族。我们用一个单变量函数 fi(R) 限定∑i=1tdi|Ai|,其中 R 是按词法顺序排列的 Ai 的最后一个元素,并验证了 -fi(R)具有比极值结果更强的单调性。我们认为,除了极值结果之外,本文中函数的单模态性本身也很有趣。
Two families and are cross-intersecting if for any and . We call t families pairwise cross-intersecting families if and are cross-intersecting for . Additionally, if for each , then we say that are non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting. Let be non-empty pairwise cross-intersecting families with , , and be positive numbers. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound of and characterize the families attaining the upper bound. Our results unifies results of Frankl and Tokushige (1992) [5], Shi, Frankl and Qian (2022) [15], Huang, Peng and Wang [10], and Zhang and Feng [16]. Furthermore, our result can be applied in the treatment for some while all previous known results do not have such an application. In the proof, a result of Kruskal and Katona is applied to allow us to consider only families whose elements are the first elements in lexicographic order. We bound by a single variable function , where R is the last element of in lexicographic order, and verify that has unimodality which is stronger than the extremal result. We think that the unimodality of functions in this paper is interesting in its own, in addition to the extremal result.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Combinatorial Theory publishes original mathematical research concerned with theoretical and physical aspects of the study of finite and discrete structures in all branches of science. Series A is concerned primarily with structures, designs, and applications of combinatorics and is a valuable tool for mathematicians and computer scientists.