{"title":"伊朗非特异性颈痛患者颈部结果评分问卷波斯语版的翻译、跨文化适应性、可靠性和有效性","authors":"Mohammad Reza Tehrani PhD, PT , Seyed Ramin Dabiri MD , Afsaneh Zeinalzadeh PhD, PT , Hamed Mami-Pour MS, PT , Salman Nazary-Moghadam PhD, PT","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The primary purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the neck outcome score (NOOS) questionnaire into Persian language and investigate its reliability and validity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The NOOS questionnaire was translated into Persian language and culturally adapted according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain were requested to complete the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire, 36-item short form survey (SF-36), and neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. The 95 patients of them were requested to fulfill the Persian version of NOOS again, with 3 to 5 days interval. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. The construct validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, SF-36 subscales, and NDI, and pain was measured using visual analog scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain participated in validity studies and 95 patients agreed to participate in reliability studies. Floor/ceiling effects were not observed. Cronbach's α values of the subscale ranged between 0.60 and 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficient measures of the NOOS subscales ranging between 0.81 and 0.95. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscales and SF-36 subscales ranged between 0.11 and 0.72. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores and NDI questionnaire ranged between 0.33 and 0.61. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores, and pain (visual analog scale) ranged between 0.31 and 0.66.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study showed that the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire was a reliable and valid instrument to assess patients’ perception of their neck-related problems in Iranian patients with nonspecific neck pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Neck Outcome Score Questionnaire in Iranian Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Reza Tehrani PhD, PT , Seyed Ramin Dabiri MD , Afsaneh Zeinalzadeh PhD, PT , Hamed Mami-Pour MS, PT , Salman Nazary-Moghadam PhD, PT\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The primary purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the neck outcome score (NOOS) questionnaire into Persian language and investigate its reliability and validity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The NOOS questionnaire was translated into Persian language and culturally adapted according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain were requested to complete the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire, 36-item short form survey (SF-36), and neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. The 95 patients of them were requested to fulfill the Persian version of NOOS again, with 3 to 5 days interval. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. The construct validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, SF-36 subscales, and NDI, and pain was measured using visual analog scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain participated in validity studies and 95 patients agreed to participate in reliability studies. Floor/ceiling effects were not observed. Cronbach's α values of the subscale ranged between 0.60 and 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficient measures of the NOOS subscales ranging between 0.81 and 0.95. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscales and SF-36 subscales ranged between 0.11 and 0.72. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores and NDI questionnaire ranged between 0.33 and 0.61. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores, and pain (visual analog scale) ranged between 0.31 and 0.66.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study showed that the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire was a reliable and valid instrument to assess patients’ perception of their neck-related problems in Iranian patients with nonspecific neck pain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 127-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Neck Outcome Score Questionnaire in Iranian Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain
Objective
The primary purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the neck outcome score (NOOS) questionnaire into Persian language and investigate its reliability and validity.
Methods
The NOOS questionnaire was translated into Persian language and culturally adapted according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain were requested to complete the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire, 36-item short form survey (SF-36), and neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. The 95 patients of them were requested to fulfill the Persian version of NOOS again, with 3 to 5 days interval. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. The construct validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, SF-36 subscales, and NDI, and pain was measured using visual analog scale.
Results
One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain participated in validity studies and 95 patients agreed to participate in reliability studies. Floor/ceiling effects were not observed. Cronbach's α values of the subscale ranged between 0.60 and 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficient measures of the NOOS subscales ranging between 0.81 and 0.95. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscales and SF-36 subscales ranged between 0.11 and 0.72. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores and NDI questionnaire ranged between 0.33 and 0.61. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores, and pain (visual analog scale) ranged between 0.31 and 0.66.
Conclusion
This study showed that the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire was a reliable and valid instrument to assess patients’ perception of their neck-related problems in Iranian patients with nonspecific neck pain.