Tao Sun, Xinhua Zhang, Yujie Cai, Chun Yang, Zhurui Gao
{"title":"青藏高原总初级生产力对山洪暴发干旱的响应","authors":"Tao Sun, Xinhua Zhang, Yujie Cai, Chun Yang, Zhurui Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flash droughts are expected to become the 'new normal' in the future, significantly affecting the carbon dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. The rapid onset, swift intensification, and short duration of flash droughts make their impact on terrestrial carbon dynamics challenging to capture. To date, the response pattern of regional terrestrial carbon dynamics to flash droughts on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau (QTP) remains unclear. Utilizing ERA5-Land soil moisture data, we identified numerous sub-seasonal flash drought events on the QTP by analyzing the decline rate of soil moisture and drought duration. Based on the dynamics of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) gross primary productivity (GPP) changes observed during flash droughts, we proposed the Response Intensity Index (RII) to quantify the intensity of GPP responses to these events. Additionally, through partial correlation analysis, we examined the effects of climatic factors on GPP during flash droughts. We found that areas with high frequencies of flash droughts are distributed in the northern, eastern, and southeastern margins of the QTP (more than 1.6 times/year), while areas with low frequencies are located in the western region (less than 0.4 times/year). GPP significantly responded to 50.36% of the flash drought events on the QTP. The intensity of GPP response varied significantly among vegetation types, with meadow GPP exhibiting the highest responsiveness (RII of 1.867) and forest GPP the lowest (RII of 1.585). Climatic factors exerted significant effects on GPP during flash droughts, with variations observed across different vegetation types. Differences in GPP response to flash droughts may be attributed to vegetation type, climatic conditions, and the frequency and duration of flash droughts. These findings provide valuable insights for managing carbon sequestration in ecosystems, offering essential guidance for future environmental management, climate change adaptation, and ecological conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"500 ","pages":"Article 110953"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of gross primary productivity to flash droughts on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau\",\"authors\":\"Tao Sun, Xinhua Zhang, Yujie Cai, Chun Yang, Zhurui Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Flash droughts are expected to become the 'new normal' in the future, significantly affecting the carbon dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. The rapid onset, swift intensification, and short duration of flash droughts make their impact on terrestrial carbon dynamics challenging to capture. To date, the response pattern of regional terrestrial carbon dynamics to flash droughts on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau (QTP) remains unclear. Utilizing ERA5-Land soil moisture data, we identified numerous sub-seasonal flash drought events on the QTP by analyzing the decline rate of soil moisture and drought duration. Based on the dynamics of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) gross primary productivity (GPP) changes observed during flash droughts, we proposed the Response Intensity Index (RII) to quantify the intensity of GPP responses to these events. Additionally, through partial correlation analysis, we examined the effects of climatic factors on GPP during flash droughts. We found that areas with high frequencies of flash droughts are distributed in the northern, eastern, and southeastern margins of the QTP (more than 1.6 times/year), while areas with low frequencies are located in the western region (less than 0.4 times/year). GPP significantly responded to 50.36% of the flash drought events on the QTP. The intensity of GPP response varied significantly among vegetation types, with meadow GPP exhibiting the highest responsiveness (RII of 1.867) and forest GPP the lowest (RII of 1.585). Climatic factors exerted significant effects on GPP during flash droughts, with variations observed across different vegetation types. Differences in GPP response to flash droughts may be attributed to vegetation type, climatic conditions, and the frequency and duration of flash droughts. These findings provide valuable insights for managing carbon sequestration in ecosystems, offering essential guidance for future environmental management, climate change adaptation, and ecological conservation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"volume\":\"500 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024003417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024003417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Response of gross primary productivity to flash droughts on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
Flash droughts are expected to become the 'new normal' in the future, significantly affecting the carbon dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. The rapid onset, swift intensification, and short duration of flash droughts make their impact on terrestrial carbon dynamics challenging to capture. To date, the response pattern of regional terrestrial carbon dynamics to flash droughts on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau (QTP) remains unclear. Utilizing ERA5-Land soil moisture data, we identified numerous sub-seasonal flash drought events on the QTP by analyzing the decline rate of soil moisture and drought duration. Based on the dynamics of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) gross primary productivity (GPP) changes observed during flash droughts, we proposed the Response Intensity Index (RII) to quantify the intensity of GPP responses to these events. Additionally, through partial correlation analysis, we examined the effects of climatic factors on GPP during flash droughts. We found that areas with high frequencies of flash droughts are distributed in the northern, eastern, and southeastern margins of the QTP (more than 1.6 times/year), while areas with low frequencies are located in the western region (less than 0.4 times/year). GPP significantly responded to 50.36% of the flash drought events on the QTP. The intensity of GPP response varied significantly among vegetation types, with meadow GPP exhibiting the highest responsiveness (RII of 1.867) and forest GPP the lowest (RII of 1.585). Climatic factors exerted significant effects on GPP during flash droughts, with variations observed across different vegetation types. Differences in GPP response to flash droughts may be attributed to vegetation type, climatic conditions, and the frequency and duration of flash droughts. These findings provide valuable insights for managing carbon sequestration in ecosystems, offering essential guidance for future environmental management, climate change adaptation, and ecological conservation.
期刊介绍:
The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).