澳大利亚悉尼殖民地绵羊颅骨形状差异的几何形态计量分析

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104876
Tanja Nussbaumer, Melanie Fillios
{"title":"澳大利亚悉尼殖民地绵羊颅骨形状差异的几何形态计量分析","authors":"Tanja Nussbaumer,&nbsp;Melanie Fillios","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Geometric morphometrics (GMMs) is a valuable tool that can be used to identify variability within species, thereby distinguishing between breeds and closely related animals (e.g. sheep and goats). Identifying fine morphological differences is key to better understanding early herd management practices. Interestingly, GMMs has yet to be used in a colonial Australian context, particularly in the foundational period of colonial Sydney from 1790 to 1850. Given the overall importance of sheep to the development of colonial Australia, this analytical gap provides an opportunity to identify potential morphological variability, and so better understand colonial herd management strategies. Here we use GMMs to analyse an archaeological assemblage of sheep crania (<em>n</em> = 27) from the colonial Clarence Street site, in Sydney, Australia. These crania are compared to modern sheep specimens to test GMMs’ effectiveness at distinguishing between, as well as potentially allocating individuals to, specific breeds. We found certain morphological variations between the study assemblages, and so discuss our results in the context of a variety of explanatory frameworks such as differences in husbandry practices in colonial Sydney.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 104876"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometric morphometric analysis of cranium shape differences in sheep from colonial Sydney, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Tanja Nussbaumer,&nbsp;Melanie Fillios\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Geometric morphometrics (GMMs) is a valuable tool that can be used to identify variability within species, thereby distinguishing between breeds and closely related animals (e.g. sheep and goats). Identifying fine morphological differences is key to better understanding early herd management practices. Interestingly, GMMs has yet to be used in a colonial Australian context, particularly in the foundational period of colonial Sydney from 1790 to 1850. Given the overall importance of sheep to the development of colonial Australia, this analytical gap provides an opportunity to identify potential morphological variability, and so better understand colonial herd management strategies. Here we use GMMs to analyse an archaeological assemblage of sheep crania (<em>n</em> = 27) from the colonial Clarence Street site, in Sydney, Australia. These crania are compared to modern sheep specimens to test GMMs’ effectiveness at distinguishing between, as well as potentially allocating individuals to, specific breeds. We found certain morphological variations between the study assemblages, and so discuss our results in the context of a variety of explanatory frameworks such as differences in husbandry practices in colonial Sydney.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24005042\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24005042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几何形态计量学(GMMs)是一种宝贵的工具,可用于识别物种内部的变异性,从而区分品种和近缘动物(如绵羊和山羊)。识别细微的形态差异是更好地了解早期畜群管理实践的关键。有趣的是,GMMs 尚未用于澳大利亚殖民时期,特别是 1790 年至 1850 年悉尼殖民时期。鉴于绵羊对澳大利亚殖民地发展的整体重要性,这一分析空白为识别潜在的形态变异提供了机会,从而更好地了解殖民时期的畜群管理策略。在这里,我们使用 GMMs 分析了来自澳大利亚悉尼克拉伦斯街殖民遗址的一组绵羊头盖骨(n = 27)。我们将这些绵羊头骨与现代绵羊标本进行了比较,以检验 GMM 在区分特定品种绵羊以及将个体归入特定品种方面的有效性。我们发现研究组合之间存在某些形态上的差异,因此在各种解释框架(如悉尼殖民时期饲养方式的差异)的背景下讨论了我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geometric morphometric analysis of cranium shape differences in sheep from colonial Sydney, Australia
Geometric morphometrics (GMMs) is a valuable tool that can be used to identify variability within species, thereby distinguishing between breeds and closely related animals (e.g. sheep and goats). Identifying fine morphological differences is key to better understanding early herd management practices. Interestingly, GMMs has yet to be used in a colonial Australian context, particularly in the foundational period of colonial Sydney from 1790 to 1850. Given the overall importance of sheep to the development of colonial Australia, this analytical gap provides an opportunity to identify potential morphological variability, and so better understand colonial herd management strategies. Here we use GMMs to analyse an archaeological assemblage of sheep crania (n = 27) from the colonial Clarence Street site, in Sydney, Australia. These crania are compared to modern sheep specimens to test GMMs’ effectiveness at distinguishing between, as well as potentially allocating individuals to, specific breeds. We found certain morphological variations between the study assemblages, and so discuss our results in the context of a variety of explanatory frameworks such as differences in husbandry practices in colonial Sydney.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
期刊最新文献
Strontium isotopes in human mobility research: BASr proxies in an anthropologically modified landscape An Early Neolithic ‘cracking technology’: Assessing the thermal shock behaviour of organic-tempered low-fired ceramics Preservation of δ13C signatures in oak charred wood: Application to the “forest” of Notre-Dame de Paris The age of hand stencils in Maltravieso cave (Extremadura, Spain) established by U-Th dating, and its implications for the early development of art A functional study of ground stone knives and sickles in the Lower Yangtze River Region during the Late Neolithic and Bronze Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1