关于高等教育真实评估的系统文献综述:培养 21 世纪技能的最佳实践与政策考虑

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425
Dimitrios Vlachopoulos , Agoritsa Makri
{"title":"关于高等教育真实评估的系统文献综述:培养 21 世纪技能的最佳实践与政策考虑","authors":"Dimitrios Vlachopoulos ,&nbsp;Agoritsa Makri","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Authentic assessment methods involve the application of real-world tasks to evaluate students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes in a way that replicates actual situations in which those would be utilized. This paper systematically reviews relevant literature from various disciplines in higher education, focusing on the development of 21st-century skills that can enhance students’ employability. The main objectives are to explore both reported effective implementation strategies of authentic assessment and the implications across different stakeholder groups-students, teaching staff, and policy makers. A sample of 94 articles was identified following the predefined inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that authentic assessment enhances key employability skills; at the same time, challenges have been identified for its effective implementation, including resistance from some stakeholders and the need for adequate training and resources. This study opens avenues for future research, presenting potential directions, as well as practical implications and policy recommendations emerging from a comprehensive thematic analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations\",\"authors\":\"Dimitrios Vlachopoulos ,&nbsp;Agoritsa Makri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Authentic assessment methods involve the application of real-world tasks to evaluate students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes in a way that replicates actual situations in which those would be utilized. This paper systematically reviews relevant literature from various disciplines in higher education, focusing on the development of 21st-century skills that can enhance students’ employability. The main objectives are to explore both reported effective implementation strategies of authentic assessment and the implications across different stakeholder groups-students, teaching staff, and policy makers. A sample of 94 articles was identified following the predefined inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that authentic assessment enhances key employability skills; at the same time, challenges have been identified for its effective implementation, including resistance from some stakeholders and the need for adequate training and resources. This study opens avenues for future research, presenting potential directions, as well as practical implications and policy recommendations emerging from a comprehensive thematic analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24001044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24001044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

真实的评估方法涉及应用真实世界的任务来评估学生的知识、技能和态度,其方式与实际应用这些知识、技能和态度的情况相同。本文系统地回顾了高等教育各学科的相关文献,重点关注能够提高学生就业能力的 21 世纪技能的培养。主要目的是探讨真实评价的有效实施策略,以及对不同利益相关群体--学生、教学人员和政策制定者--的影响。按照预先确定的纳入标准,确定了 94 篇文章样本。研究结果表明,真实评价能提高关键的就业技能;同时,也发现了有效实施真实评价所面临的挑战,包括一些利益相关者的抵制以及需要足够的培训和资源。本研究为今后的研究开辟了道路,提出了潜在的方向,以及通过全面的专题分析得出的实际影响和政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations
Authentic assessment methods involve the application of real-world tasks to evaluate students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes in a way that replicates actual situations in which those would be utilized. This paper systematically reviews relevant literature from various disciplines in higher education, focusing on the development of 21st-century skills that can enhance students’ employability. The main objectives are to explore both reported effective implementation strategies of authentic assessment and the implications across different stakeholder groups-students, teaching staff, and policy makers. A sample of 94 articles was identified following the predefined inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that authentic assessment enhances key employability skills; at the same time, challenges have been identified for its effective implementation, including resistance from some stakeholders and the need for adequate training and resources. This study opens avenues for future research, presenting potential directions, as well as practical implications and policy recommendations emerging from a comprehensive thematic analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations Preservice teachers’ pedagogical and psychological knowledge: Structure and learning opportunities The effects of peer feedback provision and reception on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ writing development Assessment as learning: Evidence based on meta-analysis and quantitative ethnography research Teaching quality and student achievement inequalities in low- and middle-income countries: A hierarchical linear model analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1