我们是否具备根据物种保护状况对其进行分类的必要洞察力?世界最南端蜥蜴属的案例研究

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126766
Fernando Moya , Jorge Mella-Romero , Javier A. Simonetti
{"title":"我们是否具备根据物种保护状况对其进行分类的必要洞察力?世界最南端蜥蜴属的案例研究","authors":"Fernando Moya ,&nbsp;Jorge Mella-Romero ,&nbsp;Javier A. Simonetti","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Endemic species generally have higher risk of extinction; therefore, it is necessary to focus conservation actions on these groups. Tools such as the Red List, through its criteria (A, B, C, D and E) allow to establish extinction risk and a conservation status for the species. <em>Liolaemus</em> is a highly diversified genus of lizards from southern South America. In Chile, 64% of the species within this genus are endemic, and more than 25% are threatened. However, for most of <em>Liolaemus</em> we have little biological information. In this study, to assess whether the current insights are sufficient to establish the conservation statuses of these species and to determine the criteria on which the current conservation statuses are based, a bibliographic review of all available information was conducted for the Chilean endemic <em>Liolaemus</em> species. Our results show that the most-used criteria were those of distribution (B and D). However, abundance studies were poorly represented. Species with wider distributions present the highest number of studies and more restricted species are little studied. Finally, many evaluations are based on the expert’s opinion. We conclude that further current and temporal studies of abundance and distribution, key aspects of ecology to assess species, are essential to generate an adequate conservation status of the genus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 126766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we have the necessary insights to classify species according to their conservation status? A case study in the world’s southernmost lizard genus\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Moya ,&nbsp;Jorge Mella-Romero ,&nbsp;Javier A. Simonetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Endemic species generally have higher risk of extinction; therefore, it is necessary to focus conservation actions on these groups. Tools such as the Red List, through its criteria (A, B, C, D and E) allow to establish extinction risk and a conservation status for the species. <em>Liolaemus</em> is a highly diversified genus of lizards from southern South America. In Chile, 64% of the species within this genus are endemic, and more than 25% are threatened. However, for most of <em>Liolaemus</em> we have little biological information. In this study, to assess whether the current insights are sufficient to establish the conservation statuses of these species and to determine the criteria on which the current conservation statuses are based, a bibliographic review of all available information was conducted for the Chilean endemic <em>Liolaemus</em> species. Our results show that the most-used criteria were those of distribution (B and D). However, abundance studies were poorly represented. Species with wider distributions present the highest number of studies and more restricted species are little studied. Finally, many evaluations are based on the expert’s opinion. We conclude that further current and temporal studies of abundance and distribution, key aspects of ecology to assess species, are essential to generate an adequate conservation status of the genus.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138124002152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138124002152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特有物种通常面临更高的灭绝风险;因此,有必要将保护行动的重点放在这些物种群上。红色名录等工具通过其标准(A、B、C、D 和 E)可以确定物种的灭绝风险和保护状况。蜥蜴属(Liolaemus)是南美洲南部一个高度多样化的蜥蜴属。在智利,该属 64% 的物种为特有种,超过 25% 的物种受到威胁。然而,我们对大多数 Liolaemus 的生物信息知之甚少。在这项研究中,为了评估目前的认识是否足以确定这些物种的保护地位,并确定目前保护地位所依据的标准,我们对智利特有的 Liolaemus 物种的所有可用信息进行了文献综述。结果表明,使用最多的标准是分布标准(B 和 D)。然而,丰度方面的研究却很少。对分布范围较广的物种的研究数量最多,而对分布范围较小的物种的研究则很少。最后,许多评估都是基于专家的意见。我们得出的结论是,对物种评估的关键生态学方面,即丰度和分布进行进一步的当前和时间研究,对于确定该属的适当保护状况至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do we have the necessary insights to classify species according to their conservation status? A case study in the world’s southernmost lizard genus
Endemic species generally have higher risk of extinction; therefore, it is necessary to focus conservation actions on these groups. Tools such as the Red List, through its criteria (A, B, C, D and E) allow to establish extinction risk and a conservation status for the species. Liolaemus is a highly diversified genus of lizards from southern South America. In Chile, 64% of the species within this genus are endemic, and more than 25% are threatened. However, for most of Liolaemus we have little biological information. In this study, to assess whether the current insights are sufficient to establish the conservation statuses of these species and to determine the criteria on which the current conservation statuses are based, a bibliographic review of all available information was conducted for the Chilean endemic Liolaemus species. Our results show that the most-used criteria were those of distribution (B and D). However, abundance studies were poorly represented. Species with wider distributions present the highest number of studies and more restricted species are little studied. Finally, many evaluations are based on the expert’s opinion. We conclude that further current and temporal studies of abundance and distribution, key aspects of ecology to assess species, are essential to generate an adequate conservation status of the genus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to “Surviving the Tide: Assessing Guiana dolphin persistence amidst growing threats in a protected estuary in South-eastern Brazil” [J. Nature Conserv. 82 (2024) 126713] From virtue to sin: Is the installation of bat boxes an effective conservation measure or a potential pitfall for vulnerable bat species? Paying for green tide management or participating in cleanup activities? Testing and controlling for payment vehicle bias in the valuation of ecological damage caused by green tides Predicting climate driven habitat shifts for the Egyptian vulture in Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1