建立合理的能效项目经济和风险评估框架

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2024.104090
Géremi Gilson Dranka , José Donizetti de Lima , Dalmarino Setti , Gilson Adamczuk Oliveira , Marcelo Gonçalves Trentin , Tânia Regina Sieminkoski Sirota , Paula Ferreira
{"title":"建立合理的能效项目经济和风险评估框架","authors":"Géremi Gilson Dranka ,&nbsp;José Donizetti de Lima ,&nbsp;Dalmarino Setti ,&nbsp;Gilson Adamczuk Oliveira ,&nbsp;Marcelo Gonçalves Trentin ,&nbsp;Tânia Regina Sieminkoski Sirota ,&nbsp;Paula Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2024.104090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shifting towards a low-carbon and sustainable economy requires both a shift to Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and a significant increase in Energy Efficiency (EE) targets. This paper introduces a novel, user-friendly, and step-by-step framework for the techno-economic and risk-based assessment of EE Projects (FEEP). The four-stage methodology represents a step beyond traditional methods by systematically identifying intervention areas, conducting technical evaluations, and providing a comprehensive tool for economic and risk assessment. The proposed tool may empower decision-makers to select the most suitable approaches for the economic viability analysis of future projects. The framework incorporates environmental assessment, quantifying anticipated CO<sub>2</sub> reductions from EE measures. A real-world case study demonstrates how the new framework allows structuring the decision-making process under a reliable and straightforward approach, providing additional confidence to the investors through visual risk assessment indicators. The paper concludes with how managers and EE analysts of private and public institutions can take advantage of the proposed methodology to evaluate and benchmark a broader range of EE initiatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 104090"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a rational framework for economic and risk assessment of energy efficiency projects\",\"authors\":\"Géremi Gilson Dranka ,&nbsp;José Donizetti de Lima ,&nbsp;Dalmarino Setti ,&nbsp;Gilson Adamczuk Oliveira ,&nbsp;Marcelo Gonçalves Trentin ,&nbsp;Tânia Regina Sieminkoski Sirota ,&nbsp;Paula Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seta.2024.104090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shifting towards a low-carbon and sustainable economy requires both a shift to Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and a significant increase in Energy Efficiency (EE) targets. This paper introduces a novel, user-friendly, and step-by-step framework for the techno-economic and risk-based assessment of EE Projects (FEEP). The four-stage methodology represents a step beyond traditional methods by systematically identifying intervention areas, conducting technical evaluations, and providing a comprehensive tool for economic and risk assessment. The proposed tool may empower decision-makers to select the most suitable approaches for the economic viability analysis of future projects. The framework incorporates environmental assessment, quantifying anticipated CO<sub>2</sub> reductions from EE measures. A real-world case study demonstrates how the new framework allows structuring the decision-making process under a reliable and straightforward approach, providing additional confidence to the investors through visual risk assessment indicators. The paper concludes with how managers and EE analysts of private and public institutions can take advantage of the proposed methodology to evaluate and benchmark a broader range of EE initiatives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138824004867\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138824004867","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

向低碳和可持续经济转型既需要转向可再生能源 (RES),也需要大幅提高能源效率 (EE) 目标。本文介绍了一个新颖的、用户友好的、循序渐进的节能项目(FEEP)技术经济和风险评估框架。通过系统地确定干预领域、进行技术评估以及提供经济和风险评估的综合工具,该四阶段方法超越了传统方法。建议的工具可帮助决策者为未来项目的经济可行性分析选择最合适的方法。该框架结合了环境评估,量化了节能减排措施的预期二氧化碳减排量。一个实际案例研究展示了新框架如何以可靠、直接的方法构建决策过程,并通过可视化风险评估指标为投资者提供更多信心。本文最后介绍了私营和公共机构的管理者和能源效率分析师如何利用所提出的方法来评估更广泛的能源效率措施并制定基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a rational framework for economic and risk assessment of energy efficiency projects
Shifting towards a low-carbon and sustainable economy requires both a shift to Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and a significant increase in Energy Efficiency (EE) targets. This paper introduces a novel, user-friendly, and step-by-step framework for the techno-economic and risk-based assessment of EE Projects (FEEP). The four-stage methodology represents a step beyond traditional methods by systematically identifying intervention areas, conducting technical evaluations, and providing a comprehensive tool for economic and risk assessment. The proposed tool may empower decision-makers to select the most suitable approaches for the economic viability analysis of future projects. The framework incorporates environmental assessment, quantifying anticipated CO2 reductions from EE measures. A real-world case study demonstrates how the new framework allows structuring the decision-making process under a reliable and straightforward approach, providing additional confidence to the investors through visual risk assessment indicators. The paper concludes with how managers and EE analysts of private and public institutions can take advantage of the proposed methodology to evaluate and benchmark a broader range of EE initiatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
期刊最新文献
Towards a rational framework for economic and risk assessment of energy efficiency projects Analysis of vehicle-to-grid economy based on sustainable development grounded in game theory Residential energy consumption and price forecasting in smart homes based on the internet of energy Convective heat transfer coefficient for realistic turbulence parameters using LES vs. RANS turbulence models in case of free-standing photovoltaic panel Challenges and opportunities in Machine learning for bioenergy crop yield Prediction: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1