剖宫产时母亲主动用力的效果:随机对照试验。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07835-1
Ahmed Sayed, Anwar A Sayed, Delnaz Fard, Peter Hillemanns, Constantin Von Kaisenberg, Rüdiger Klapdor
{"title":"剖宫产时母亲主动用力的效果:随机对照试验。","authors":"Ahmed Sayed, Anwar A Sayed, Delnaz Fard, Peter Hillemanns, Constantin Von Kaisenberg, Rüdiger Klapdor","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07835-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of maternal active pushing during cesarean section (CS) on postoperative pain, intraoperative discomfort, and the mother's sense of control and participation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, randomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the Conventional group (n = 45), the CS was performed traditionally without maternal pushing. In the Assisted group (n = 55), patients were instructed to push during delivery. Outcomes measures included patients' perceived pressure, pain, and sense of participation. Breastfeeding and postnatal depression were assessed using validated scales, along with maternal and neonatal outcomes, surgeon satisfaction, and operation duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the Assisted group reported significantly lower fundal pressure intensity (VAS score 3 vs. 5, P < 0.01) compared to the Conventional group. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain. However, women in the Assisted group reported a greater sense of participation (6 vs. 0, P < 0.01) and control (4 vs. 0, P < 0.05) than those in the Conventional group. No significant maternal or neonatal complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maternal active pushing during CS positively impacted intraoperative experience by reducing perceived pressure and enhancing the sense of control and participation, without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal outcomes. These findings support further research with larger, multi-center studies to validate the potential benefits of this approach.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05520580 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05520580 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of mother's active pushing at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Sayed, Anwar A Sayed, Delnaz Fard, Peter Hillemanns, Constantin Von Kaisenberg, Rüdiger Klapdor\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07835-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of maternal active pushing during cesarean section (CS) on postoperative pain, intraoperative discomfort, and the mother's sense of control and participation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, randomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the Conventional group (n = 45), the CS was performed traditionally without maternal pushing. In the Assisted group (n = 55), patients were instructed to push during delivery. Outcomes measures included patients' perceived pressure, pain, and sense of participation. Breastfeeding and postnatal depression were assessed using validated scales, along with maternal and neonatal outcomes, surgeon satisfaction, and operation duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the Assisted group reported significantly lower fundal pressure intensity (VAS score 3 vs. 5, P < 0.01) compared to the Conventional group. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain. However, women in the Assisted group reported a greater sense of participation (6 vs. 0, P < 0.01) and control (4 vs. 0, P < 0.05) than those in the Conventional group. No significant maternal or neonatal complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maternal active pushing during CS positively impacted intraoperative experience by reducing perceived pressure and enhancing the sense of control and participation, without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal outcomes. These findings support further research with larger, multi-center studies to validate the potential benefits of this approach.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05520580 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05520580 ).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07835-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07835-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估剖宫产术(CS)中产妇主动用力对术后疼痛、术中不适以及产妇控制感和参与感的影响:本研究旨在评估剖宫产术(CS)中产妇主动用力对术后疼痛、术中不适以及产妇控制感和参与感的影响:前瞻性随机对照研究:方法:将患者随机分为两组。在传统组(n = 45),CS 以传统方式进行,产妇无需用力。在辅助组(n = 55)中,指导患者在分娩过程中用力。结果测量包括患者感受到的压力、疼痛和参与感。母乳喂养和产后抑郁情况以及产妇和新生儿结局、外科医生满意度和手术持续时间均采用有效量表进行评估:结果:助产组患者的宫底压力强度明显降低(VAS 评分 3 vs. 5,P 结论:助产组患者的宫底压力强度明显降低(VAS 评分 3 vs. 5,P 结论):在 CS 过程中,产妇主动助推对术中体验有积极影响,可降低感知压力,增强控制感和参与感,对产妇和新生儿预后无不良影响。这些发现支持进一步开展更大规模的多中心研究,以验证这种方法的潜在益处:NCT05520580 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05520580 )。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of mother's active pushing at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of maternal active pushing during cesarean section (CS) on postoperative pain, intraoperative discomfort, and the mother's sense of control and participation.

Design: A prospective, randomized controlled study.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the Conventional group (n = 45), the CS was performed traditionally without maternal pushing. In the Assisted group (n = 55), patients were instructed to push during delivery. Outcomes measures included patients' perceived pressure, pain, and sense of participation. Breastfeeding and postnatal depression were assessed using validated scales, along with maternal and neonatal outcomes, surgeon satisfaction, and operation duration.

Results: Patients in the Assisted group reported significantly lower fundal pressure intensity (VAS score 3 vs. 5, P < 0.01) compared to the Conventional group. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain. However, women in the Assisted group reported a greater sense of participation (6 vs. 0, P < 0.01) and control (4 vs. 0, P < 0.05) than those in the Conventional group. No significant maternal or neonatal complications were observed.

Conclusion: Maternal active pushing during CS positively impacted intraoperative experience by reducing perceived pressure and enhancing the sense of control and participation, without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal outcomes. These findings support further research with larger, multi-center studies to validate the potential benefits of this approach.

Trial registration: NCT05520580 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05520580 ).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
The outcome of early perineal rehabilitation in obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a single-center experience. Comparison of complications and surgery outcomes in skin closure methods following cesarean sections. Impact of a new image enhancement technology on the nuchal translucency thickness. The effect of intrapartum deinfibulation on obstetric outcomes and postpartum sexual function in pregnant women with Type 3 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Unmet clinical needs in women with polycystic ovary syndrome regarding fertility and obesity: a cross-sectional study from the patient's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1