肝细胞癌患者服用抗生素和慢性药物对免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/ajco.14139
Kennedy Yao Yi Ng, Albert Eng Keong Teo, Sze Huey Tan, Jack Jie En Tan, Desiree Shu Hui Tay, Ailica Wan Xin Lee, Andrea Jing Shi Ang, Lawrence Wen Jun Wong, Su Pin Choo, Han Chong Toh, Suat Ying Lee, Joycelyn Jie Xin Lee, David Wai-Meng Tai
{"title":"肝细胞癌患者服用抗生素和慢性药物对免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响","authors":"Kennedy Yao Yi Ng, Albert Eng Keong Teo, Sze Huey Tan, Jack Jie En Tan, Desiree Shu Hui Tay, Ailica Wan Xin Lee, Andrea Jing Shi Ang, Lawrence Wen Jun Wong, Su Pin Choo, Han Chong Toh, Suat Ying Lee, Joycelyn Jie Xin Lee, David Wai-Meng Tai","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The interaction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and concomitant medications such as antibiotics, metformin, statins, beta-blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and low-dose aspirin has been studied in other malignancies. Our study aims to investigate the relationship between these medications and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who received at least one dose of ICIs between May 2015 and November 2019 was performed. The primary objectives were to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and without medication usage. Log rank test was used to assess for differences in survival. Hazard ratios were reported using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The data cutoff date was December 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 168 patients were included. Median age was 69 years, 85.7% male, 60.7% ECOG 0, 78.0% Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis, 57.7% hepatitis B etiology, 8.9% hepatitis C, and 33.3% nonviral. One hundred three patients (61.3%) received ICI monotherapy, while 38.7% received ICI in combination. Sixty-two patients (36.9%) had concomitant antibiotic usage, 26.8% metformin, 30.4% statin, 31.0% beta-blockers, 60.1% PPI, 6.5% NSAIDs, and 11.9% aspirin. Patients with aHCC receiving antibiotics did not have a shorter OS (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.40, 95% CI 0.94-2.09, p = 0.096) or shorter PFS (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.34, p = 0.73), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics. However, patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology receiving ICI treatment and concurrent antibiotics had shorter OS (5.5 vs. 14.2 months, aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.17-3.17, p = 0.010) and PFS (1.1 vs. 2.6 months, aHR 2.69, 95% CI 1.28-5.65, p = 0.009), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of antibiotics may diminish ICI efficacy in patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology, while the use of metformin, statins, beta-blockers, NSAIDs, and aspirin is not associated with significant clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Antibiotics and Chronic Medications on Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Kennedy Yao Yi Ng, Albert Eng Keong Teo, Sze Huey Tan, Jack Jie En Tan, Desiree Shu Hui Tay, Ailica Wan Xin Lee, Andrea Jing Shi Ang, Lawrence Wen Jun Wong, Su Pin Choo, Han Chong Toh, Suat Ying Lee, Joycelyn Jie Xin Lee, David Wai-Meng Tai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajco.14139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The interaction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and concomitant medications such as antibiotics, metformin, statins, beta-blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and low-dose aspirin has been studied in other malignancies. Our study aims to investigate the relationship between these medications and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who received at least one dose of ICIs between May 2015 and November 2019 was performed. The primary objectives were to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and without medication usage. Log rank test was used to assess for differences in survival. Hazard ratios were reported using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The data cutoff date was December 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 168 patients were included. Median age was 69 years, 85.7% male, 60.7% ECOG 0, 78.0% Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis, 57.7% hepatitis B etiology, 8.9% hepatitis C, and 33.3% nonviral. One hundred three patients (61.3%) received ICI monotherapy, while 38.7% received ICI in combination. Sixty-two patients (36.9%) had concomitant antibiotic usage, 26.8% metformin, 30.4% statin, 31.0% beta-blockers, 60.1% PPI, 6.5% NSAIDs, and 11.9% aspirin. Patients with aHCC receiving antibiotics did not have a shorter OS (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.40, 95% CI 0.94-2.09, p = 0.096) or shorter PFS (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.34, p = 0.73), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics. However, patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology receiving ICI treatment and concurrent antibiotics had shorter OS (5.5 vs. 14.2 months, aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.17-3.17, p = 0.010) and PFS (1.1 vs. 2.6 months, aHR 2.69, 95% CI 1.28-5.65, p = 0.009), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of antibiotics may diminish ICI efficacy in patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology, while the use of metformin, statins, beta-blockers, NSAIDs, and aspirin is not associated with significant clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14139\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)与抗生素、二甲双胍、他汀类药物、β-受体阻滞剂、质子泵抑制剂(PPI)、非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和小剂量阿司匹林等伴随药物的相互作用已在其他恶性肿瘤中进行过研究。我们的研究旨在探讨这些药物与晚期肝细胞癌(aHCC)患者 ICI 疗效之间的关系:我们对 2015 年 5 月至 2019 年 11 月期间至少接受过一次 ICIs 治疗的患者进行了回顾性研究。主要目的是比较用药和未用药患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用对数秩检验评估生存期的差异。使用 Cox 比例危险回归分析报告危险比。数据截止日期为2020年12月31日:共纳入 168 名患者。中位年龄为 69 岁,85.7% 为男性,60.7% 为 ECOG 0,78.0% 为 Child-Pugh A 型肝硬化,57.7% 为乙型肝炎病因,8.9% 为丙型肝炎,33.3% 为非病毒性肝炎。103 名患者(61.3%)接受了 ICI 单药治疗,38.7% 接受了 ICI 联合治疗。62名患者(36.9%)同时服用抗生素,26.8%服用二甲双胍,30.4%服用他汀类药物,31.0%服用β受体阻滞剂,60.1%服用PPI,6.5%服用非甾体抗炎药,11.9%服用阿司匹林。与未接受抗生素治疗的患者相比,接受抗生素治疗的aHCC患者的OS(调整后HR [aHR] 1.40,95% CI 0.94-2.09,p = 0.096)和PFS(aHR 0.94,95% CI 0.66-1.34,p = 0.73)并没有缩短。然而,与未接受抗生素治疗的患者相比,接受 ICI 治疗并同时使用抗生素的病毒性肝炎 aHCC 患者的 OS(5.5 个月 vs. 14.2 个月,aHR 1.93,95% CI 1.17-3.17,p = 0.010)和 PFS(1.1 个月 vs. 2.6 个月,aHR 2.69,95% CI 1.28-5.65,p = 0.009)更短:结论:抗生素的使用可能会降低病毒性肝炎aHCC患者的ICI疗效,而二甲双胍、他汀类药物、β-受体阻滞剂、非甾体抗炎药和阿司匹林的使用与显著的临床结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Antibiotics and Chronic Medications on Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background and aims: The interaction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and concomitant medications such as antibiotics, metformin, statins, beta-blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and low-dose aspirin has been studied in other malignancies. Our study aims to investigate the relationship between these medications and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who received at least one dose of ICIs between May 2015 and November 2019 was performed. The primary objectives were to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and without medication usage. Log rank test was used to assess for differences in survival. Hazard ratios were reported using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The data cutoff date was December 31, 2020.

Results: A total of 168 patients were included. Median age was 69 years, 85.7% male, 60.7% ECOG 0, 78.0% Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis, 57.7% hepatitis B etiology, 8.9% hepatitis C, and 33.3% nonviral. One hundred three patients (61.3%) received ICI monotherapy, while 38.7% received ICI in combination. Sixty-two patients (36.9%) had concomitant antibiotic usage, 26.8% metformin, 30.4% statin, 31.0% beta-blockers, 60.1% PPI, 6.5% NSAIDs, and 11.9% aspirin. Patients with aHCC receiving antibiotics did not have a shorter OS (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.40, 95% CI 0.94-2.09, p = 0.096) or shorter PFS (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.34, p = 0.73), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics. However, patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology receiving ICI treatment and concurrent antibiotics had shorter OS (5.5 vs. 14.2 months, aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.17-3.17, p = 0.010) and PFS (1.1 vs. 2.6 months, aHR 2.69, 95% CI 1.28-5.65, p = 0.009), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics.

Conclusions: The use of antibiotics may diminish ICI efficacy in patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology, while the use of metformin, statins, beta-blockers, NSAIDs, and aspirin is not associated with significant clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Antibiotics and Chronic Medications on Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. The Case for Shared Decision-making in Oncology and Why the Philippine Healthcare System is Primed for It. Berberine and Lung Cancer: From Pure Form to Its Nanoformulations. Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009-2018. Real-World Outcomes of Patients Treated With Gemcitabine Using Standardized Dose and Rate and Docetaxel for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma in an Australian Sarcoma Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1