Hanna L. Kleiboeker, Alyson Prom, Krista Paplaczyk, Jacob Wang, Nicole Borkowski, Brad Miner, Jennifer Wright, Mrinalini Venkata Subramani, Ambalavanan Arunachalam, Alan D. Betensley, Rade Tomic, Catherine N. Myers
{"title":"用于巨细胞病毒一级预防的来替莫韦对肺移植受者骨髓抑制和免疫抑制的影响","authors":"Hanna L. Kleiboeker, Alyson Prom, Krista Paplaczyk, Jacob Wang, Nicole Borkowski, Brad Miner, Jennifer Wright, Mrinalini Venkata Subramani, Ambalavanan Arunachalam, Alan D. Betensley, Rade Tomic, Catherine N. Myers","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with detrimental outcomes after lung transplantation (LTX); primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is guideline-recommended. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, spurring interest in letermovir (LTV).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adults undergoing LTX between January 1, 2021, and July 30, 2022 at our institution who were converted from VGC to LTV for PPX were evaluated. Outcomes included antimetabolite dosing during PPX, the incidence and frequency of myelosuppressive events, and the time to the first myelosuppressive event.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-nine LTX recipients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients received non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and had moderate risk CMV serostatus (D+/R+, 48.3%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV 177 days (IQR 102 days) post-transplant. After conversion to LTV, patients tolerated higher daily doses of mycophenolate (721 mg vs. 1000 mg, <i>p</i> = 0.008) or azathioprine (33.3 mg vs. 62.5 mg, <i>p</i> = 0.478). The incidence of myelosuppressive events was reduced (100.0% vs. 62.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) including leukopenia (96.6% vs. 58.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), severe leukopenia (82.8% vs 31.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and neutropenia requiring GCSF (96.6% vs. 48.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) while on VGC compared to LTV. While on LTV, patients had a reduced rate of myelosuppressive events compared to VGC (1 event per 6.2 patient days vs. 1 event per 14.7 patient days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). While on LTV, one patient had breakthrough viremia (3.4%) that was treated with (val)ganciclovir.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this single-center study, patients tolerated higher doses of antimetabolite immunosuppression, and the incidence and frequency of myelosuppressive events were reduced while on LTV compared to VGC. This evidence expands upon the current literature demonstrating improved tolerability of LTV in LTX recipients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Primary Prophylaxis on Myelosuppression and Immunosuppression in Lung Transplant Recipients\",\"authors\":\"Hanna L. Kleiboeker, Alyson Prom, Krista Paplaczyk, Jacob Wang, Nicole Borkowski, Brad Miner, Jennifer Wright, Mrinalini Venkata Subramani, Ambalavanan Arunachalam, Alan D. Betensley, Rade Tomic, Catherine N. Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with detrimental outcomes after lung transplantation (LTX); primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is guideline-recommended. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, spurring interest in letermovir (LTV).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adults undergoing LTX between January 1, 2021, and July 30, 2022 at our institution who were converted from VGC to LTV for PPX were evaluated. Outcomes included antimetabolite dosing during PPX, the incidence and frequency of myelosuppressive events, and the time to the first myelosuppressive event.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-nine LTX recipients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients received non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and had moderate risk CMV serostatus (D+/R+, 48.3%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV 177 days (IQR 102 days) post-transplant. After conversion to LTV, patients tolerated higher daily doses of mycophenolate (721 mg vs. 1000 mg, <i>p</i> = 0.008) or azathioprine (33.3 mg vs. 62.5 mg, <i>p</i> = 0.478). The incidence of myelosuppressive events was reduced (100.0% vs. 62.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) including leukopenia (96.6% vs. 58.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), severe leukopenia (82.8% vs 31.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and neutropenia requiring GCSF (96.6% vs. 48.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) while on VGC compared to LTV. While on LTV, patients had a reduced rate of myelosuppressive events compared to VGC (1 event per 6.2 patient days vs. 1 event per 14.7 patient days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). While on LTV, one patient had breakthrough viremia (3.4%) that was treated with (val)ganciclovir.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this single-center study, patients tolerated higher doses of antimetabolite immunosuppression, and the incidence and frequency of myelosuppressive events were reduced while on LTV compared to VGC. This evidence expands upon the current literature demonstrating improved tolerability of LTV in LTX recipients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"38 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Primary Prophylaxis on Myelosuppression and Immunosuppression in Lung Transplant Recipients
Background
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with detrimental outcomes after lung transplantation (LTX); primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is guideline-recommended. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, spurring interest in letermovir (LTV).
Methods
Adults undergoing LTX between January 1, 2021, and July 30, 2022 at our institution who were converted from VGC to LTV for PPX were evaluated. Outcomes included antimetabolite dosing during PPX, the incidence and frequency of myelosuppressive events, and the time to the first myelosuppressive event.
Results
Twenty-nine LTX recipients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients received non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and had moderate risk CMV serostatus (D+/R+, 48.3%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV 177 days (IQR 102 days) post-transplant. After conversion to LTV, patients tolerated higher daily doses of mycophenolate (721 mg vs. 1000 mg, p = 0.008) or azathioprine (33.3 mg vs. 62.5 mg, p = 0.478). The incidence of myelosuppressive events was reduced (100.0% vs. 62.1%, p < 0.001) including leukopenia (96.6% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.001), severe leukopenia (82.8% vs 31.0%, p < 0.001) and neutropenia requiring GCSF (96.6% vs. 48.3%, p < 0.001) while on VGC compared to LTV. While on LTV, patients had a reduced rate of myelosuppressive events compared to VGC (1 event per 6.2 patient days vs. 1 event per 14.7 patient days, p < 0.001). While on LTV, one patient had breakthrough viremia (3.4%) that was treated with (val)ganciclovir.
Conclusions
In this single-center study, patients tolerated higher doses of antimetabolite immunosuppression, and the incidence and frequency of myelosuppressive events were reduced while on LTV compared to VGC. This evidence expands upon the current literature demonstrating improved tolerability of LTV in LTX recipients.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.