Multi-omic molecular characterization and diagnostic biomarkers for occult hepatitis B infection and HBsAg-positive hepatitis B infection.

Background: The pathological and physiological characteristics between HBsAg-positive HBV infection and occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) are currently unclear. This study aimed to explore the immune microenvironment in the peripheral circulation of OBI patients through integration of proteomic and metabolomic sequencing, and to identify molecular biomarkers for clinical diagnosis of HBsAg-positive HBV and OBI.

Methods: This research involved collection of plasma from 20 patients with OBI (negative for HBsAg but positive for HBV DNA, with HBV DNA levels < 200 IU/mL), 20 patients with HBsAg-positive HBV infection, and 10 healthy individuals. Mass spectrometry-based detection was used to analyze the proteome, while nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was employed to study the metabolomic phenotypes. Differential molecule analysis, pathway enrichment and functional annotation, as well as weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA), were conducted to uncover the characteristics of HBV-related liver disease. Prognostic biomarkers were identified using machine learning algorithms, and their validity was confirmed in a larger cohort using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results: HBsAg-positive HBV individuals showed higher ALT levels (p=0.010) when compared to OBI patients. The influence of HBV infection on metabolic functions and inflammation was evident through the analysis of distinct metabolic pathways in HBsAg-positive HBV and OBI groups. Tissue tracing demonstrated a connection between Kupffer cells and HBsAg-positive HBV infection, as well as between hepatocytes and OBI. Immune profiling revealed the correlation between CD4 Tem cells, memory B cells and OBI, enabling a rapid response to infection reactivation through cytokine secretion and antibody production. A machine learning-constructed and significantly expressed molecule-based diagnostic model effectively differentiated HBsAg-positive and OBI groups (AUC values > 0.8). ELISA assay confirmed the elevation of FGB and FGG in OBI samples, suggesting their potential as biomarkers for distinguishing OBI from HBsAg-positive infection.

Conclusions: The immune microenvironment and metabolic status of HBsAg-positive HBV patients and OBI patients vary significantly. The machine learning-based diagnostic model described herein displayed impressive classification accuracy, presenting a non-invasive means of differentiating between OBI and HBsAg-positive HBV infections.