Emily S Ho, Erica Dove, Lorna Aitkens, Andrea Duncan, Anne M R Agur
{"title":"学生对基于视频的专业课程计算机辅助教学的批判性自我反思和看法。","authors":"Emily S Ho, Erica Dove, Lorna Aitkens, Andrea Duncan, Anne M R Agur","doi":"10.1177/23821205241296984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The cost, high resource demands, and psychological significance of in-person cadaveric labs are barriers to their use. Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) of gross anatomy is widely available as an alternative option. However, student engagement, reflections, and expectations of learning anatomy with CAI instead of in-person labs may influence their learning experience and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate students' critical self-reflection and perceptions of learning using online self-guided anatomy modules with video-based pro-section CAI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted with first-year occupational therapy students who received anatomy education using CAI involving online self-guided anatomy modules with video-based pro-section instruction. Critical self-reflection was measured using Kember's Critical Self-Reflection Questionnaire scores and open-ended comments. Paired analysis of self-reported Kember nonreflective and reflective actions was conducted followed by quantitative (correlation, Student <i>t</i>-tests) and qualitative (directed content analysis) exploration of factors associated with critical self-reflection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 126 students enrolled in the study, 97 consented and completed the study. The students' Kember Understanding (U) subscale mean score was significantly higher than the Habitual Action (HA), Reflection, and Critical Self-Reflection subscales. The largest effect size was found between the U and HA subscales (<i>d<sub>s </sub></i> = 1.3, 95% CI [1.0, 1.5]). Academic outcomes (anatomy quiz sum score, term grade) did not correlate with the Kember scores. Overall, students felt that video-based anatomy pro-section CAI was best used in a supplementary manner and opportunities for hands-on learning of anatomy were needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Video-based anatomy pro-section CAI helped students understand anatomy but did not readily engage students in critical self-reflection. Strategic course and curriculum design with integrated and hands-on learning opportunities are needed to optimize student anatomy learning experience and academic outcomes while using this type of CAI.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"11 ","pages":"23821205241296984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Critical Self-Reflection and Perceptions of Video-Based Pro-Section Computer-Assisted Instruction.\",\"authors\":\"Emily S Ho, Erica Dove, Lorna Aitkens, Andrea Duncan, Anne M R Agur\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205241296984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The cost, high resource demands, and psychological significance of in-person cadaveric labs are barriers to their use. Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) of gross anatomy is widely available as an alternative option. However, student engagement, reflections, and expectations of learning anatomy with CAI instead of in-person labs may influence their learning experience and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate students' critical self-reflection and perceptions of learning using online self-guided anatomy modules with video-based pro-section CAI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted with first-year occupational therapy students who received anatomy education using CAI involving online self-guided anatomy modules with video-based pro-section instruction. Critical self-reflection was measured using Kember's Critical Self-Reflection Questionnaire scores and open-ended comments. Paired analysis of self-reported Kember nonreflective and reflective actions was conducted followed by quantitative (correlation, Student <i>t</i>-tests) and qualitative (directed content analysis) exploration of factors associated with critical self-reflection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 126 students enrolled in the study, 97 consented and completed the study. The students' Kember Understanding (U) subscale mean score was significantly higher than the Habitual Action (HA), Reflection, and Critical Self-Reflection subscales. The largest effect size was found between the U and HA subscales (<i>d<sub>s </sub></i> = 1.3, 95% CI [1.0, 1.5]). Academic outcomes (anatomy quiz sum score, term grade) did not correlate with the Kember scores. Overall, students felt that video-based anatomy pro-section CAI was best used in a supplementary manner and opportunities for hands-on learning of anatomy were needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Video-based anatomy pro-section CAI helped students understand anatomy but did not readily engage students in critical self-reflection. Strategic course and curriculum design with integrated and hands-on learning opportunities are needed to optimize student anatomy learning experience and academic outcomes while using this type of CAI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23821205241296984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241296984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241296984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:面对面尸体实验室的成本、高资源需求和心理意义是其使用的障碍。大体解剖学计算机辅助教学(CAI)作为一种替代选择已被广泛使用。目的:评估学生的批判性自我反思以及对使用在线自导解剖模块和基于视频的剖面 CAI 学习的看法:方法: 对使用在线自导解剖模块和基于视频的剖面演示 CAI 接受解剖教育的一年级职业治疗学生进行了一项前瞻性观察横断面研究。批判性自我反思使用 Kember 的批判性自我反思问卷得分和开放式评论进行测量。对自我报告的 Kember 非反思行为和反思行为进行配对分析,然后对与批判性自我反思相关的因素进行定量(相关性、学生 t 检验)和定性(定向内容分析)探索:在参加研究的 126 名学生中,97 人同意并完成了研究。学生的 Kember Understanding (U) 分量表平均得分明显高于 Habitual Action (HA)、Reflection 和 Critical Self-Reflection 分量表。U和HA分量表之间的效应大小最大(ds = 1.3,95% CI [1.0,1.5])。学习成绩(解剖学测验总分、学期成绩)与 Kember 分数没有关联。总的来说,学生们认为基于视频的解剖学剖腹产 CAI 最好以辅助方式使用,还需要动手学习解剖学的机会:结论:基于视频的解剖学剖腹产 CAI 有助于学生理解解剖学,但不容易让学生进行批判性的自我反思。在使用这种类型的 CAI 时,需要战略性的课程和课程设计,并提供综合和实践学习机会,以优化学生的解剖学习体验和学术成果。
Student Critical Self-Reflection and Perceptions of Video-Based Pro-Section Computer-Assisted Instruction.
Introduction: The cost, high resource demands, and psychological significance of in-person cadaveric labs are barriers to their use. Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) of gross anatomy is widely available as an alternative option. However, student engagement, reflections, and expectations of learning anatomy with CAI instead of in-person labs may influence their learning experience and outcomes.
Purpose: To evaluate students' critical self-reflection and perceptions of learning using online self-guided anatomy modules with video-based pro-section CAI.
Methods: A prospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted with first-year occupational therapy students who received anatomy education using CAI involving online self-guided anatomy modules with video-based pro-section instruction. Critical self-reflection was measured using Kember's Critical Self-Reflection Questionnaire scores and open-ended comments. Paired analysis of self-reported Kember nonreflective and reflective actions was conducted followed by quantitative (correlation, Student t-tests) and qualitative (directed content analysis) exploration of factors associated with critical self-reflection.
Results: Of the 126 students enrolled in the study, 97 consented and completed the study. The students' Kember Understanding (U) subscale mean score was significantly higher than the Habitual Action (HA), Reflection, and Critical Self-Reflection subscales. The largest effect size was found between the U and HA subscales (ds = 1.3, 95% CI [1.0, 1.5]). Academic outcomes (anatomy quiz sum score, term grade) did not correlate with the Kember scores. Overall, students felt that video-based anatomy pro-section CAI was best used in a supplementary manner and opportunities for hands-on learning of anatomy were needed.
Conclusion: Video-based anatomy pro-section CAI helped students understand anatomy but did not readily engage students in critical self-reflection. Strategic course and curriculum design with integrated and hands-on learning opportunities are needed to optimize student anatomy learning experience and academic outcomes while using this type of CAI.